Originally Posted by
blacklistedbully
Ok, I was trying to play nice, but since you insist on being a complete, bumbling moronic jackass, I'll play along.
It's losers like you that can't win a debate on merits that start the "personal attack" BS. You think it hides your lack of intelligence, when in reality, it highlights it. You just aren't competent enough to do it civilly, so out pour the "f*cking idiot's", "you're dumb", "you're stupid", juvenile antics.
I never said TR or Perk were chokers. I did infer Bell is a choker. TR is a matter of Dan trying to force a square peg into a round hole, combined with a guy (TR) who has great character and leadership qualities, but he also continued to struggle on the field by being too slow on his progressions and not throwing to targets before their break. I think TR got frustrated with being a non-running QB playing in a system that requires the QB to be a real running threat. I think he sometimes tried too hard to prove he could succeed in that system, by "hanging in tough" willing to take the hit, but giving up crucial sacks, or scrambling for little-to-no-gain. Perk is another high-character, leader-type, but for as much as I loved the guy, he was not at all effective running the ball between the tackles, yet that is how Mullen mostly used him. I would have loved to see a lot more of Perk in the slot, or possibly optioning Perk on the edges with Dak as QB. This is what I meant by Dan not putting the right guys in position to succeed. TR throwing for a bunch of yards is not what I meant by succeed if those 70 yards he got on a drive are negated because he took a sack on 3rd down that pushed us back out of FG range.
"Just shut up about the kicking stuff. You look dumb." What a well-thought-out, intelligent reply to the facts I gave you. I may "look dumb" to you, but you, sir are certifiably dumb.
Arky. You ridiculous moron. Home field advantage is worth about 3 points. Some Arky scores:
52-0
52-7
20 point loss to a badly struggling UF.
They scored a lot on TAMU. Who didn't?
Of their 9 losses, only 3 were close. 2 of those were us & Rutgers, both teams who have struggled this year despite being bowl-bound.
LSU is good, but inconsistent. There is simply no way you can compare their effort versus us to their effort over OM. Ironically, the LSU game we played was one of the more impressive efforts until the wheels came off the wagon late. But don't accuse me of saying something I didn't say. It just further proves what a complete imbecile you are. Ole Miss was overrated this year. Do you really want to argue that point??
You're either drunk, incompetent or both if you somehow get from my statement that I'm "contradicting myself", That statement is just so over-the-top stupid that there isn't even an opportunity to point out it's flaw. It's that disconnected and useless.
I've been a rabid fan since the early 80s, and have only criticized our team when I feel it's honest & justified. I do it on message boards like this much the same as I would at a party, just casual conversation & debate. Debate I keep respectful until some moron like you takes it in another direction. You see, intelligent, decent people can disagree respectfully. Assholes like you don't seem capable. In my experience that's more often than not a sign that the asshole-in-question (you) is self-aware enough to know he's a bit of a dumbass, therefore needs to mask his inefficiencies in loud, boastful talk and/or insults. What makes this even funnier is I got accused by other fans of being "too optimistic" earlier in the season. You want to accuse me of "running down our program" and "never being satisfied", yet I was absolutely thrilled with our program & Mullen until I saw what we did last year, AND followed it up with this year.
Last year, I was defending Dan & staff during our win streak over soft teams by saying & believing Dan was just being conservative so he wouldn't show his hand too early to the good teams. That turned out to not be true. I started getting frustrated then. But coming into this season, I was again optimistic, more than most because I didn't think there was any way Mullen would continue to roll with TR at QB, Perk as the sole Rb, and running Perk between the tackles over & over & over again. I convinced myself that there was simply no way Dan could review what happened in the last half of last year, AND DO THE SAME THING AGAIN! But he did, and more. He added the Bell debacle to that shitastic formula.
THAT, more than anything is why I am frustrated with Dan. Because he will take something that has failed repeatedly, rarely ever succeeding, and run it again & again, almost as if he's thinking to himself, "It'll work this time because there's no way they'll expect me to dial that shit up again! I'll catch 'em by surprise."
