Results 1 to 20 of 334

Thread: dogs vs cocks game 3

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    4,853
    vCash
    3621
    Quote Originally Posted by Homedawg View Post
    Hmmm. How??
    I’m not saying he blew it, cause nobody was hitting with RISP

    But you can’t put Hatcher in games other SWAC games, that’s giving up on a hitting position.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    13,372
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by The Federalist Engineer View Post
    I?m not saying he blew it, cause nobody was hitting with RISP

    But you can?t put Hatcher in games other SWAC games, that?s giving up on a hitting position.
    So you'd have left Hancock in at first?? W a lead in the 9th?? No way

  3. #3
    Senior Member Really Clark?'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    12,666
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Homedawg View Post
    So you'd have left Hancock in at first?? W a lead in the 9th?? No way
    I didn’t have a problem with that but with a 1 run lead I’m not pulling my 3 and 4 hole hitters in that situation. Too tight of a game

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    13,372
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by Really Clark? View Post
    I didn’t have a problem with that but with a 1 run lead I’m not pulling my 3 and 4 hole hitters in that situation. Too tight of a game
    You don't disagree yet Hancock was hitting forth. And most on here bitch about James playing third period. Yet our defensive replacement mad the throwing error.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Really Clark?'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    12,666
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Homedawg View Post
    You don't disagree yet Hancock was hitting forth. And most on here bitch about James playing third period. Yet our defensive replacement mad the throwing error.
    I didn?t have a problem necessarily pulling Hancock for Hatcher or James for Leggett, one or the other but not both. Or leaving it as it is, which is what I mist likely would have done. Just not both 3 and 4 hole hitters

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    4,853
    vCash
    3621
    Quote Originally Posted by Homedawg View Post
    So you'd have left Hancock in at first?? W a lead in the 9th?? No way
    Yes leave Hancock. And we should not have messed with brilliant Infield of Friday and Saturday

    In a home run park like Founders, a 1-run lead can fly over a wall regardless of replacements or shifts, so you don?t trade a competent bat for a zero threat hitter with only marginally better defense.

    Polk explained on radio how K James bat is invigorated by not playing defense.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.