-
Originally Posted by
HoopsDawg
Half the 7th graders in MS smoke weed. If Leach is one and done, Cohen will have to step in.
50% of 7th graders? where you hear that?
-
Originally Posted by
bulldawg28
Agreed
There's no logic to hiring Sark over Leach. None whatsoever.
People in decision making positions have to justify their hirings. They can't just throw crap at the wall and keep their job.
There's not a single bit of logic to hiring Sark over Leach that you could justify to a university president.
CAN'T PUT A SADDLE ON A MUSTANG
Quit Your Bi$&$&?!, He's Not Going to Run the Ball More
-
If the rules are "don't smoke weed", then I have no problem with a player being booted for smoking weed. Why is it wrong to hold people accountable?
-
Originally Posted by
somebodyshotmypaw
If the rules are "don't smoke weed", then I have no problem with a player being booted for smoking weed. Why is it wrong to hold people accountable?
Agree, but I don't think that's the rule. If that's the rule and only backups happen to smoke weed, then that's interesting natural selection bias
CAN'T PUT A SADDLE ON A MUSTANG
Quit Your Bi$&$&?!, He's Not Going to Run the Ball More
-
Originally Posted by
ShotgunDawg
There's no logic to hiring Sark over Leach. None whatsoever.
People in decision making positions have to justify their hirings. They can't just throw crap at the wall and keep their job.
There's not a single bit of logic to hiring Sark over Leach that you could justify to a university president.
A young upcoming coach that's a proven winner and program manager sounds better than an end of his career old school media darling.
-
Originally Posted by
ShotgunDawg
I don't think Sark was the answer at all
Sark is a dang good football coach. If he is really on the wagon then somebody is going to get a very good head coach very soon. That is the only thing working against him.
-
Originally Posted by
ShotgunDawg
There's no logic to hiring Sark over Leach. None whatsoever.
People in decision making positions have to justify their hirings. They can't just throw crap at the wall and keep their job.
There's not a single bit of logic to hiring Sark over Leach that you could justify to a university president.
He is a better coach that isn't a media darling one trick pony.
-
Originally Posted by
Liverpooldawg
Sark is a dang good football coach. If he is really on the wagon then somebody is going to get a very good head coach very soon. That is the only thing working against him.
That may be so but there's no logic to hiring him over Leach and you wouldn't bet $5 mil on Sark being better
CAN'T PUT A SADDLE ON A MUSTANG
Quit Your Bi$&$&?!, He's Not Going to Run the Ball More
-
Originally Posted by
Liverpooldawg
He is a better coach that isn't a media darling one trick pony.
then why doesn't his head coaching record reflect that?
CAN'T PUT A SADDLE ON A MUSTANG
Quit Your Bi$&$&?!, He's Not Going to Run the Ball More
-
Originally Posted by
ShotgunDawg
then why doesn't his head coaching record reflect that?
I wouldn't have hired Sark over Leach at the time. You have to be careful hiring Bama assistants. Cohen got fooled by Moorhead and didn't realize how much talent Moorhead was working with at Penn State.
Leach can win here if he will adapt. If he continues to blame personnel and execution like you do as a dense poster, he will fail.
-
Originally Posted by
ShotgunDawg
There's no logic to hiring Sark over Leach. None whatsoever.
People in decision making positions have to justify their hirings. They can't just throw crap at the wall and keep their job.
There's not a single bit of logic to hiring Sark over Leach that you could justify to a university president.
This is 17n message board dude.
My point was Sark's offense is looking good. Leach's not so much. If you want to talk real, I can get Cohen being apprehensive about hiring Sark given his exit at USC. However, you are being illogical regarding Sark for the sole purpose of defending your coach crush. Sark took over a UW team that had 5 losing seasons prior, which included a 0-12 season. He had one decent year at USC and won 8 games, calling plays drunk. He has a .550 winning percentage as a HC. Leach is .600 as a HC.
We all know the reality is that Leach better workout because State is stuck with Leach 3-4 years. It has been duly noted that you're 100 a Leach guy. You don't have to run to his defense anytime someone has a thought to the contrary regarding Leach. We will all find out in 3-4 years if the Leach era is a good one. 2020...so far,the air-raid is a paper airplane.
However, you have already said this summer.... it was illogical for State to be ONLY slight favorites v Arkansas and a dog v UK for the 2020 year. You were wrong and being an illogical fan.
Last edited by Maroonthirteen; 10-29-2020 at 10:39 AM.
-
Originally Posted by
bulldawg28
A young upcoming coach that's a proven winner and program manager sounds better than an end of his career old school media darling.
Young upcoming?
He's already failed at 2 blue bloods. There's a lot more to running a program than just being a bright offensive mind.
CAN'T PUT A SADDLE ON A MUSTANG
Quit Your Bi$&$&?!, He's Not Going to Run the Ball More
-
Originally Posted by
HoopsDawg
I wouldn't have hired Sark over Leach at the time. You have to be careful hiring Bama assistants. Cohen got fooled by Moorhead and didn't realize how much talent Moorhead was working with at Penn State.
Leach can win here if he will adapt. If he continues to blame personnel and execution like you do as a dense poster, he will fail.
100% agree
CAN'T PUT A SADDLE ON A MUSTANG
Quit Your Bi$&$&?!, He's Not Going to Run the Ball More
-
Originally Posted by
Maroonthirteen
This is 17n message board dude.
My point was Sark's offense is looking good. Leach's not so much.
So this is really the extent of the opinion. Pretty in depth analysis here. I'm sure college presidents would be thrilled with you as an AD
CAN'T PUT A SADDLE ON A MUSTANG
Quit Your Bi$&$&?!, He's Not Going to Run the Ball More
-
The fact that people are mad that kids are held accountable and face consequences due to breaking rules is perplexing. Microcosm of society I guess.
-
Originally Posted by
ShotgunDawg
Young upcoming?
He's already failed at 2 blue bloods. There's a lot more to running a program than just being a bright offensive mind.
Leach ultimately failed at Tech and was run off. WSU was glad he left. Sark has more upside.
-
Originally Posted by
bulldawg28
Leach ultimately failed at Tech and was run off. WSU was glad he left. Sark has more upside.
What freak are you smoking? Failed at TECH? You have no idea what you are saying.. WSU glad he left? UMMMM, they will be back to winning 1-3 game a year in short order.
-
Senior Member
Originally Posted by
Hot Rock
What freak are you smoking? Failed at TECH? You have no idea what you are saying.. WSU glad he left? UMMMM, they will be back to winning 1-3 game a year in short order.
He's got to be just trolling at this point, right? He can't be this stupid and dishonest, right?
-
Originally Posted by
bulldawg28
Leach ultimately failed at Tech and was run off. WSU was glad he left. Sark has more upside.
He may have failed at being nice to booster's kids but he did not fail at winning at TTech.
2000 7-6
2001 7-6
2002 9-5
2003 8-5
2004 8-4
2005 9-3
2006 8-5
2007 9-4
2008 11-2
2009 8-4 didn't coach bowl but they won on his system so 9-4.
I'm not sure if he will win at State or not but to say he failed at TTech is simply not true with regards to winning and losing.
-
Originally Posted by
Hot Rock
What freak are you smoking? Failed at TECH? You have no idea what you are saying.. WSU glad he left? UMMMM, they will be back to winning 1-3 game a year in short order.
If you're fired or run off, you failed. He was fired at TexasTech.... that's failing.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.