-
Originally Posted by
LC Dawg
So if Tate changes his mind (or has it changed for him) and vetoes it there would still be a need for the 2/3 votes to override the veto right?
I just hate having to rely on the word of a politician. I'm ready for it to be completely over.
No. Only majority for override.
The only hang up is if the court determines this is legal to do (which I fear they will rule it isn't, but again I'm not the most well versed in law, only took a few undergrad courses and didn't pursue law school.)
-
Originally Posted by
dantheman4248
No. Only majority for override.
The only hang up is if the court determines this is legal to do (which I fear they will rule it isn't, but again I'm not the most well versed in law, only took a few undergrad courses and didn't pursue law school.)
Thanks
-
Originally Posted by
LC Dawg
So if Tate changes his mind (or has it changed for him) and vetoes it there would still be a need for the 2/3 votes to override the veto right?
I just hate having to rely on the word of a politician. I'm ready for it to be completely over.
I don?t think you need to worry about this one. Now, when they start trying to change county names and such, that?ll become a major political battle.
-
Originally Posted by
DownwardDawg
I don?t think you need to worry about this one. Now, when they start trying to change county names and such, that?ll become a major political battle.
Something that does worry me, though, is a certain someone, who happens to enjoy tweeting and gaslighting on a massive scale, somehow stumbles across this story and decides to opine about it to all his twitter minions.....
I could see "yes" votes, as well as the Guv, getting cold feet if that happened.
-
Originally Posted by
Rex54
It's going to be Obama county
"After dealing with Ole Miss for over a year," he said, "I've learned to expect their leadership to do and say things that the leadership at other Division I schools would never consider doing and to justify their actions by reminding themselves that "We're Ole Miss.""
- Tom Mars, Esq. 4.9.18
-
Originally Posted by
Gutter Cobreh
You were saying?
I happily stand shocked and corrected.
-
Originally Posted by
Mobile Bay
I happily stand shocked and corrected.
Can't say I wasn't surprised as well. I envisioned some backwoods bloc of legislatures getting together and causing it not to pass.
Great day for MS!!!
-
Originally Posted by
DownwardDawg
I don?t think you need to worry about this one. Now, when they start trying to change county names and such, that?ll become a major political battle.
"John Wayne Airport" - cancelled!
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/cal...rt-renamed.amp
-
Originally Posted by
Rex54
It's going to be Obama county
Naw, but it does need to be changed.
-
Originally Posted by
dantheman4248
No. Only majority for override.
The only hang up is if the court determines this is legal to do (which I fear they will rule it isn't, but again I'm not the most well versed in law, only took a few undergrad courses and didn't pursue law school.)
No you would need 2/3 of the legislature to override a veto. But only Need a majority to pass the bill and get it sent to Tate for his signing into law.
But Tate is not going to veto it.
-
Originally Posted by
Rex54
Oh no. Not John Wayne airport. That place was the foundation of American culture. Thomas Jefferson spent many months contemplating democracy at that airport. Sadly, America is lost. The communists have won.
-
Originally Posted by
confucius say
No you would need 2/3 of the legislature to override a veto. But only Need a majority to pass the bill and get it sent to Tate for his signing into law.
But Tate is not going to veto it.
I must have misunderstood because I thought this being 2/3rds overrides any possible tater veto. Idk. Our political system is very wonky (the us in general not just MS)
-
Originally Posted by
dantheman4248
I must have misunderstood because I thought this being 2/3rds overrides any possible tater veto. Idk. Our political system is very wonky (the us in general not just MS)
No the 2/3 is to suspend the rules and not an actual vote on a bill.
-
Originally Posted by
dantheman4248
I must have misunderstood because I thought this being 2/3rds overrides any possible tater veto. Idk. Our political system is very wonky (the us in general not just MS)
2/3 yesterday was to suspend the rules show a vote could be had.
That vote will be today and just needs a simple majority to pass. It would go to Tate to sign into law.
If Tate were to veto the bill, then another 2/3 vote would be required to override the veto. Presumably that could be done if the same 2/3 that voted yesterday to suspend the rules voted the same way to override the veto.
-
House is starting meeting now
-
No action on the flag yet... wonder if this is related. just recessed temporarily to got rules committee.
Listening to some of these other bills just make me sick.. plain corruption being talked about and they just smile and grin.
-
Originally Posted by
ScoobaDawg
No action on the flag yet... wonder if this is related. just recessed temporarily to got rules committee.
Listening to some of these other bills just make me sick.. plain corruption being talked about and they just smile and grin.
Originally Posted by
dantheman4248
I must have misunderstood because I thought this being 2/3rds overrides any possible tater veto. Idk. Our political system is very wonky (the us in general not just MS)
Yes, rules committee is about to take up the flag bill.
-
House bill for the state flag
http://billstatus.ls.state.ms.us/202.../HB/HB1796.xml
History of Actions:
1 06/28 Suspend from Deadlines by HC 69
2 06/28 (H) Referred To Rules
Title: AN ACT TO ESTABLISH THE COMMISSION TO REDESIGN THE MISSISSIPPI STATE FLAG; TO PRESCRIBE THE MEMBERSHIP OF THE COMMISSION AND TO PROVIDE FOR ITS ORGANIZATION AND MEETINGS; TO PROVIDE THAT THE NEW DESIGN FOR THE MISSISSIPPI STATE FLAG RECOMMENDED BY THE COMMISSION SHALL NOT INCLUDE THE DESIGN OF THE CONFEDERATE BATTLE FLAG, BUT SHALL INCLUDE THE WORDS "IN GOD WE TRUST"; TO PROVIDE THAT THE COMMISSION SHALL MAKE ITS RECOMMENDATION FOR THE NEW DESIGN FOR THE MISSISSIPPI STATE FLAG BY SEPTEMBER 14, 2020; TO PROVIDE THAT THE NEW DESIGN FOR THE MISSISSIPPI STATE FLAG RECOMMENDED BY THE COMMISSION SHALL BE PLACED ON THE BALLOT IN A SPECIAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 3, 2020; TO PROVIDE THAT IF A MAJORITY OF THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS VOTE FOR THE NEW DESIGN, THEN THE LEGISLATURE SHALL ENACT INTO LAW THE NEW DESIGN AS THE OFFICIAL MISSISSIPPI STATE FLAG; TO PROVIDE THAT IF A MAJORITY OF THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS VOTE AGAINST THE NEW DESIGN, THEN THE COMMISSION SHALL RECONVENE TO RECOMMEND ANOTHER NEW DESIGN FOR THE MISSISSIPPI STATE FLAG TO BE PRESENTED TO THE LEGISLATURE DURING THE 2021 REGULAR SESSION; TO REQUIRE THAT THE SPECIAL ELECTION BE ADMINISTERED BY MEANS OF BALLOTS CONTAINING A COLOR PICTURE OR DRAWING OF THE NEW DESIGN FOR THE MISSISSIPPI STATE FLAG; TO REQUIRE THE SECRETARY OF STATE TO PROVIDE THOSE BALLOTS TO THE ELECTION COMMISSIONERS OF EACH COUNTY; TO AMEND SECTIONS 23-15-351 AND 23-15-355, MISSISSIPPI CODE OF 1972, TO CONFORM TO THE PRECEDING PROVISIONS; TO REPEAL SECTION 3-3-16, MISSISSIPPI CODE OF 1972, WHICH PROVIDES THE DESIGN FOR THE OFFICIAL FLAG OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI; AND FOR RELATED PURPOSES.
-
and we are back on the feed...
-
amendment proposed to name the bill after Kylin Hill
immediately tabled.
Last edited by ScoobaDawg; 06-28-2020 at 03:18 PM.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.