-
Rogers stat...
9 throws of 20+ in over 150 attempts is embarrassing and unacceptable.
-
So on passes of 10 yards or more he is 25/38 (66%) for 496 yards (13 per attempt) with 4TD and 0 INT. Do it more
-
We’ve definitely got to attack more
CAN'T PUT A SADDLE ON A MUSTANG
Quit Your Bi$&$&?!, He's Not Going to Run the Ball More
-
Originally Posted by
confucius say
So on passes of 10 yards or more he is 25/38 (66%) for 496 yards (13 per attempt) with 4TD and 0 INT. Do it more
Exactly. It seems to be a confidence issue. He only goes deep when the game is on the line and we have no choice. He's got to do it more, or else we have to find someone that will.
-
Originally Posted by
CadaverDawg
Exactly. It seems to be a confidence issue. He only goes deep when the game is on the line and we have no choice. He's got to do it more, or else we have to find someone that will.
Yeah somethings definitely different when he HAS to push the ball down the field. I appreciate him wanting to protect the ball but he's bogging us down. He's shown he can move this offense and move it quickly but he's got to quit being so cautious. Probably traumatized by watching Costello throw all those ints last year(I know I was).
-
Originally Posted by
Commercecomet24
Yeah somethings definitely different when he HAS to push the ball down the field. I appreciate him wanting to protect the ball but he's bogging us down. He's shown he can move this offense and move it quickly but he's got to quit being so cautious. Probably traumatized by watching Costello throw all those ints last year(I know I was).
Yeah me too, and I agree with you on all points
-
It's frustrating.
Makai Polk has PROVEN he can win 50/50 balls. Throw them up and let him go get them.
You also might draw a pass interference penalty. There are positives to throwing it deep.
-
I could care less about the deep ball, just freaking change that 28.2 behind the line of scrimmage. That is atrocious!
-
Originally Posted by
Maverick91
I could care less about the deep ball, just freaking change that 28.2 behind the line of scrimmage. That is atrocious!
Haha so true
-
We have as many yards on 7 completions of 20+ as we do 42 completions behind the LOS.
-
Originally Posted by
Commercecomet24
Yeah somethings definitely different when he HAS to push the ball down the field. I appreciate him wanting to protect the ball but he's bogging us down. He's shown he can move this offense and move it quickly but he's got to quit being so cautious. Probably traumatized by watching Costello throw all those ints last year(I know I was).
Ironically his only interception thus far was on a pass behind the LOS.
Will is like Matt Wyatt without the turnovers.
-
Originally Posted by
CadaverDawg
We have as many yards on 7 completions of 20+ as we do 42 completions behind the LOS.
It's insane. Everyone in the stands can see people open. Like wide ass open. And Will checks it down most of the time.
-
Originally Posted by
CadaverDawg
We have as many yards on 7 completions of 20+ as we do 42 completions behind the LOS.
Ouch!
-
Even if you don't complete them you've got to chunk it deep at least a couple times a game to open things up. Heck even Brady's last year in New England when he didn't have any legitimate deep threat he was hampered big time because there's no way to loosen up a defense.
-
Originally Posted by
Commercecomet24
Even if you don't complete them you've got to chunk it deep at least a couple times a game to open things up. Heck even Brady's last year in New England when he didn't have any legitimate deep threat he was hampered big time because there's no way to loosen up a defense.
That's the other thing. It's not like we don't have good receivers now. Heath and Polk can catch deep balls. Walley is a play maker. Not to mention others. Even Austin Williams is a solid receiver.
-
Originally Posted by
CadaverDawg
We have as many yards on 7 completions of 20+ as we do 42 completions behind the LOS.
I cannot imagine how much different our season would look if that wasn't the case.
-
Originally Posted by
Commercecomet24
Even if you don't complete them you've got to chunk it deep at least a couple times a game to open things up. Heck even Brady's last year in New England when he didn't have any legitimate deep threat he was hampered big time because there's no way to loosen up a defense.
Yep, I think I remember seeing somewhere where Jackie said he would call a fly route once every 20+ plays just to keep the safeties from crashing. I think he even said he'd tell Madkin he didn't care if he overthrew it by 10 yards, that we were just doing it for show...if we caught it that was a bonus. At the very least, we need to do that, bc nobody respects our offense beyond 10-15 yards....nobody.
-
Originally Posted by
Todd4State
That's the other thing. It's not like we don't have good receivers now. Heath and Polk can catch deep balls. Walley is a play maker. Not to mention others. Even Austin Williams is a solid receiver.
Yeah and we have burners like Calvin and Tulu as well who can surely get deep quick.
-
Originally Posted by
CadaverDawg
Yep, I think I remember seeing somewhere where Jackie said he would call a fly route once every 20+ plays just to keep the safeties from crashing. I think he even said he'd tell Madkin he didn't care if he overthrew it by 10 yards, that we were just doing it for show...if we caught it that was a bonus. At the very least, we need to do that, bc nobody respects our offense beyond 10-15 yards....nobody.
You absolutely have to. You have to at least make people think you can do it and looking at the stats Will has done pretty well at it. If the whole defense is playing within 10 yards of the LOS way to congested.
-
So I just realized he has a higher completion percentage, 78%, on passes 20+, than he has on passes 0-9 yds (77%)
That is wild
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.