-
Anti-Leach doesn't mean anti-pass
This is one of the more annoying, bothersome critiques from the pro-Leach crowd. Just because I'm not a fan of Leach (never have been) doesn't mean I want to run the wish bone or triple option. It just means that I think there are better (pass happy) options that would fit our university and demographics better. Yet there are several people who act as if Leach invented the passing game and his is the only sure fire way to go.
We also have to figure out what our goals are as a football program. When we hired Leach it was all about Cohen attempting to take us to another level that Mullen couldn't; to be able to beat the top level teams by throwing it more. Now the goalposts have been moved to we need to transition to a more modern day offense...pass heavy, throwing it all over the field. And now here we are rebuilding our football program after nuking it from the ground up, just to get back to where Dan had it. And for what, just to pass more? You're telling me the only way to transition into a more modern style offense was to blow up the program?
I get there were some locker room problems as well but you don't always have to cut off all your limbs because you have a hangnail.
-
-
Originally Posted by
msugolf
This is one of the more annoying, bothersome critiques from the pro-Leach crowd. Just because I'm not a fan of Leach (never have been) doesn't mean I want to run the wish bone or triple option. It just means that I think there are better (pass happy) options that would fit our university and demographics better. Yet there are several people who act as if Leach invented the passing game and his is the only sure fire way to go.
We also have to figure out what our goals are as a football program. When we hired Leach it was all about Cohen attempting to take us to another level that Mullen couldn't; to be able to beat the top level teams by throwing it more. Now the goalposts have been moved to we need to transition to a more modern day offense...pass heavy, throwing it all over the field. And now here we are rebuilding our football program after nuking it from the ground up, just to get back to where Dan had it. And for what, just to pass more? You're telling me the only way to transition into a more modern style offense was to blow up the program?
I get there were some locker room problems as well but you don't always have to cut off all your limbs because you have a hangnail.
Joe nuked our football program, not Leach.
I'm not sure Leach has actually kicked anyone off the team or is them quitting because the standards are high the same as kicking them off?
Who cut the limbs off?
CAN'T PUT A SADDLE ON A MUSTANG
Quit Your Bi$&$&?!, He's Not Going to Run the Ball More
-
Hear, Hear!!!!!
I realize Bounds and others want to discredit others and make others look stupid for questioning Leach. However you're exactly right. I, in no way, want a 1980 offense. I do want an offensive that is productive. Leachs offense is absolutely atrocious.
-
Originally Posted by
ShotgunDawg
Joe nuked our football program, not Leach.
I'm not sure Leach has actually kicked anyone off the team or is them quitting because the standards are high the same as kicking them off?
Who cut the limbs off?
You have to get approval from the top dog (Cohen) to be able to do what's being done to the program so I'd start there
-
Originally Posted by
msugolf
You have to get approval from the top dog (Cohen) to be able to do what's being done to the program so I'd start there
Approval to do what?
Who has Leach kicked off the team? Name one player that Leach kicked off?
CAN'T PUT A SADDLE ON A MUSTANG
Quit Your Bi$&$&?!, He's Not Going to Run the Ball More
-
Originally Posted by
msugolf
This is one of the more annoying, bothersome critiques from the pro-Leach crowd. Just because I'm not a fan of Leach (never have been) doesn't mean I want to run the wish bone or triple option. It just means that I think there are better (pass happy) options that would fit our university and demographics better. Yet there are several people who act as if Leach invented the passing game and his is the only sure fire way to go.
We also have to figure out what our goals are as a football program. When we hired Leach it was all about Cohen attempting to take us to another level that Mullen couldn't; to be able to beat the top level teams by throwing it more. Now the goalposts have been moved to we need to transition to a more modern day offense...pass heavy, throwing it all over the field. And now here we are rebuilding our football program after nuking it from the ground up, just to get back to where Dan had it. And for what, just to pass more? You're telling me the only way to transition into a more modern style offense was to blow up the program?
I get there were some locker room problems as well but you don't always have to cut off all your limbs because you have a hangnail.
Great post. People are creating a false dilemma -- you don't have to choose between the triple option and throwing the ball 65 times a game. People say Ole Miss was "pass happy" under Hugh Freeze but they never averaged fewer than 35 carries a game. You know why? Because everybody (except Mike Leach apparently) knows you have to be able to run the ball in this league.
-
You make some fair points, but I feel like there's this underlying sentiment by many, and I see it in your post, that it would have been easy just to plug any Tom, Dick or Harry in at coach and do what Dan Mullen did. Not only what Dan did, but I what he did in 2014 or at least 2015 & 2017.
1) We just weren't set up to sustain that level of success based on personnel. Yes, for 2018 and especially on defense, and that's a failing of Moorhead's, but there were some holes in the roster that are coming home to roost. There's a great T&L podcast episode from a week or two back that breaks down the last few recruiting classes and it's a mess.
2) Dan was/is a damn good coach. Yes, he lost some focus and drive with us towards the end, but what he did at his peak isn't easily replicated. He's a top coach and we were fortunate to scoop him up on the rise. Hiring a head coach in the SEC is hard, especially at State. We just don't have the ability to pick whoever we want. It's not poor ol missippi state, it's just the truth. You make a bad hire in Moorhead and a program like ours gets in a hole in a hurry. Mike Leach is a proven winner at the P5 level and has always done so with inferior talent relative to his opponents in his conference. That's exactly what we're facing, so it makes sense to get someone with that resume. You could try and land another up and comer like Dan, but the failure rate on that approach is higher than the success rate. The obvious guys have "better" options than State.
All that to say, maybe we didn't have to take on THIS transition, but I think some of what we're seeing would have happened with any coach just based on what was being taken over. We could be MORE successful on offense, but how much more? Enough to win one more game maybe? The hope obviously is that the medium/long term success will outweigh the short term sacrifice. We'll see.
-
Originally Posted by
ShotgunDawg
Approval to do what?
Who has Leach kicked off the team? Name one player that Leach kicked off?
Who said anything about kicking kids off the team? Not me ... oh wait that was you projecting that onto me ..twice. Just saying it a bunch of times doesn't make it true.
I do however believe the choice in scheme has caused some opt outs and has led to players not being utilized as well as they can/could be, which in turn has caused our fans to just say "oh so and so is horrible. we need to recruit better. Leach needs his guys." That's BS
-
Originally Posted by
bluelightstar
Great post. People are creating a false dilemma -- you don't have to choose between the triple option and throwing the ball 65 times a game. People say Ole Miss was "pass happy" under Hugh Freeze but they never averaged fewer than 35 carries a game. You know why? Because everybody (except Mike Leach apparently) knows you have to be able to run the ball in this league.
Bo Bounds is the worst at this. He had Freeze on the other day and tried to bait him into agreeing with him about the myth of a balanced offense, which Leach is known for mocking. Freeze responded "Well, we sure want to have the appearance of a balanced offense to keep defenses on their toes." Radio silence after that response ...loved it.
-
Originally Posted by
msugolf
Who said anything about kicking kids off the team? Not me ... oh wait that was you projecting that onto me ..twice. Just saying it a bunch of times doesn't make it true.
I do however believe the choice in scheme has caused some opt outs and has led to players not being utilized as well as they can/could be, which in turn has caused our fans to just say "oh so and so is horrible. we need to recruit better. Leach needs his guys." That's BS
So a scheme that some players don't fit is "burning the program to the ground"?
CAN'T PUT A SADDLE ON A MUSTANG
Quit Your Bi$&$&?!, He's Not Going to Run the Ball More
-
Dan was/is a damn good coach. Yes, he lost some focus and drive with us towards the end, but what he did at his peak isn't easily replicated. He's a top coach and we were fortunate to scoop him up on the rise. Hiring a head coach in the SEC is hard, especially at State. We just don't have the ability to pick whoever we want. It's not poor ol missippi state, it's just the truth.
This is so true. We are a very difficult place to win based on being in the SEC West. You are almost guaranteed 2 or 3 losses per year in this division. Very little room for error.
"I'm sure the universe is full of intelligent life. It's just been too intelligent to come here." -- Arthur C. Clarke
-
Originally Posted by
ShotgunDawg
So a scheme that some players don't fit is "burning the program to the ground"?
Would you rather me call it a "3-4 year transition period?" Is that less offensive?
-
You make some good points and observations. Just look at Tennessee. They have gone through coach after coach and they have plenty of resources to be successful. Finding a good coach that is a good fit isn't easy. I, for one, think schools fire coaches way to quick. But I digress that is a different topic.
However I don't buy any of this "Cohen had a vision to change the football program." He hired Moorhead because Day turned him down and Moorhead was a good hire on paper.
Cohen hired Leach because he was out of options. The whole .... get his players, transition the program... are excuses to buy time for Leach's buyout to go down.
State will get back to its roots next hiring cycle. We will really be in a rebuild at that point.
-
Originally Posted by
Maroonthirteen
You make some good points and observations. Just look at Tennessee. They have gone through coach after coach and they have plenty of resources to be successful. Finding a good coach that is a good fit isn't easy. I, for one, think schools fire coaches way to quick. But I digress that is a different topic.
However I don't buy any of this "Cohen had a vision to change the football program." He hired Moorhead because Day turned him down and Moorhead was a good hire on paper.
Cohen hired Leach because he was out of options. The whole .... get his players, transition the program... are excuses to buy time for Leach's buyout to go down.
State will get back to its roots next hiring cycle. We will really be in a rebuild at that point.
It's somewhat frustrating because if Leach fails, we're definitely going to go back to a spread option offense. And then it'll take us a while to get any running backs, a run blocking line, and a QB that can run power on 3rd and short.
-
There's nothing modern about Joe Lee Leach's offense.
-
Originally Posted by
HoopsDawg
There's nothing modern about Joe Lee Leach's offense.
I led the charge against Moorhead. Hoops taking the wheel for leach haha
-
Originally Posted by
msstate7
I led the charge against Moorhead. Hoops taking the wheel for leach haha
Moorhead recruited his tail off. He cared about the players. He tried. It just turned out that Moorhead was ill-equipped for the job. He was not a fit at MSU or as an SEC head coach. Had to move on. Cohen tried to re-create the Mullen hire and it back fired in a major way.
It feels different with Leach. It's either gross incompetence, indifference, or stubborness. To not evolve or adapt your system to attack the same defense that we have faced every single week since the LSU game is maddening. We have had 2 bye weeks and nothing. It's completely unfair to all of the players and fans. He is not putting them in a position to be successful and he has to know he's not. The only conclusion I can reasonably make is that he either doesn't give a damn or he is too incompetent to make adjustments.
-
Originally Posted by
HoopsDawg
Moorhead recruited his tail off. He cared about the players. He tried. It just turned out that Moorhead was ill-equipped for the job. He was not a fit at MSU or as an SEC head coach. Had to move on. Cohen tried to re-create the Mullen hire and it back fired in a major way.
It feels different with Leach. It's either gross incompetence, indifference, or stubborness. To not evolve or adapt your system to attack the same defense that we have faced every single week since the LSU game is maddening. We have had 2 bye weeks and nothing. It's completely unfair to all of the players and fans. He is not putting them in a position to be successful and he has to know he's not. The only conclusion I can reasonably make is that he either doesn't give a damn or he is too incompetent to make adjustments.
Well there were some adjustments made against Vandy that lead to 17 quick points when they were rushing 3, dropping 8. After they stopped that and started bringing 4 or 5, those adjustments didn't work anymore. Not excusing everything, but there literally were some adjustments that actually worked. Problem now is that we're playing a true freshman QB, true freshmen RBs, constant shuffle at OL and very few/no playmakers at WRs. The games to win were the Ark and UK games but poor QB play and crap OL play did us in.
But let's be honest, we're 6 games in during a crazy COVID year and you're declaring this a decided failure because that was your thought as soon as the hire was made. It's bias confirmation for you. Not that it's not good now, of course it's not, but that it's never going to be turned around. We simply don't know the medium/long term outlook and anyone saying so is biased and/or just guessing just as much as those saying it's definitely going to be turned around.
-
This anti-Leach crowd is the worst. They have this idea in their head that football has to be played their way. Leach ain't doing it your way but his and guess what, it works. He will get it done and you will eat crow.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.