-
Originally Posted by
Matt3467
Slightly concerning the previous posters think there is nothing wrong with nudity at a public venue with likely thousands of children present. I don't know why things like this surprise me anymore.
He isn't very smart.....
-
Originally Posted by
dawgoneyall
He isn't very smart.....
Seeing a nipple (or even 2, gasp!) would probably put you in shock, lol.
-
Originally Posted by
BeardoMSU
"Mommy Milkers" is the preferred nomenclature.**
From what little you can see on that picture the one on the left is going to have some malnourished babies.
-
Ah yes. Nekkid.
Originally Posted by
Leeshouldveflanked
The only thing about nudity is there will always be the one person who doesn?t need to get nekkid that will mess the whole deal up.
N E double-K by God I D
-
Originally Posted by
Matt3467
Slightly concerning the previous posters think there is nothing wrong with nudity at a public venue with likely thousands of children present. I don't know why things like this surprise me anymore.
There's quite a few different ways you're wrong here. Choose your own adventure argument:
You want to impose on people's freedom of speech?
Why are you mad about something that happens every single college football game? People go to the game painted up and not wearing shirts all the time. What makes you concerned with this instance?
Why even bring up children? Bodily functions and sex are normal human processes. Studies show that actual sex education helps LOWER teen pregnancy rate. Yet you want to continue like it's "out of sight / out of mind" and then get shocked when 14 y/o Susan and 15 y/o Tommy have an accident.
-
Originally Posted by
Extendedcab
In the heart of Mormon country?
The previous mayor was openly gay. You get away from Temple Square it is very liberal. It is a large city that is run by Democrats. Only 35% of Salt Lake population is Mormon.
-
Originally Posted by
Matt3467
I didn't say they were naked. To be clearer it's partial nudity. Even though a few states have legalized it doesn't make it okay and besides I believe Utah is one of the states that even though it's legal it still remains illegal to do so with children present as it's considered lewdness involving a child. Body paint isn't clothing.
You are correct Matt on all accounts.
Concerning that so many see no issues with this but not surprising. Shows the moral relativism of culture where there is no right or wrong just however I see it.
Just because something is legal doesn't make it right. Abortion legal isn't right. The Dredd Scott case and slavery was wrong even though it was legal for a time. There are moral absolutes, we just hope our laws will reflect that but many times they do not.
-
Originally Posted by
TheLostDawg
Haha +
HaHa or lol doesn't do that post justice .... that was freaking hilarious
OXFORD, Miss. (WTVA) - Ole Miss campus police ask students to behave at future baseball games following a recent incident.
The university said students were reportedly throwing rocks at Georgia baseball players during last weekend's series.
-
I don't think women should got topless to sporting events. Maybe I'm a prude, or old-fashioned, or just a bad parent. But I don't think women should go topless to sporting events. I don't like nudity in public, and I consider it nudity. But maybe since I don't teach my kids that nudity is okay, my son will wind up pregnant soon (men getting pregnant is a thing now I hear).
-
I think both ladies in this instance have more like what we'd call blisters and not big uns.
-
Originally Posted by
Lord McBuckethead
It?s just some boobs, and the guy bitching about it? It is not like you and your kids should be anywhere near the student section.
Flat boobs at that. It looks more like chest to me.
-
Originally Posted by
somebodyshotmypaw
I don't think women should got topless to sporting events. Maybe I'm a prude, or old-fashioned, or just a bad parent. But I don't think women should go topless to sporting events. I don't like nudity in public, and I consider it nudity. But maybe since I don't teach my kids that nudity is okay, my son will wind up pregnant soon (men getting pregnant is a thing now I hear).
Why only women? Why not men as well?
-
Originally Posted by
Tater
Why only women? Why not men as well?
If you don't understand the difference in body parts between men and women, then I can't help you. You should probably start by watching Kindergarten Cop. It does have some basic pointers to get you started.
-
Originally Posted by
Tater
Why only women? Why not men as well?
Because mens "boobs" are not object of sexual pleasure as women boobs are!
-
Originally Posted by
Lord McBuckethead
Seriously people, they are just boobs. If guys come to the game without shirts, girls can come to the game without shirts. They are just boobs. Matter of fact, in jurisdictions across the country, women can go topless. It is not a big deal.
People that have an issue with this, are the same people that refuse to discuss sex with their kids and then their wonder why their kid gets pregnant.
Just a matter of courtesy. If you want to hang out with your wang out around your kids, whatever. It's still bad form to do it in public generally. Certainly women going topless is less of a faux pas, but in the US it's still mostly considered rude for women to go topless in areas that aren't designated as topless, and even more so if it's in an area with kids. Even in places where topless beaches are common, you still generally see women wearing tops around town.
ETA: Obviously I personally rebel at society's unreasonable strictures on women and encourage them to free the tatas whenever and wherever, provided the women in question are reasonably attractive.
Last edited by Johnson85; 09-15-2022 at 04:16 PM.
-
My My
Kinda of a dumb question.....
-
Originally Posted by
Extendedcab
Because mens "boobs" are not object of sexual pleasure as women boobs are!
Choose your own argument to lose:
1. Women are people. They are not objects. To treat a person as an object is so inherently evil and wicked, you might as well go over to the Middle East where that dogma is taught. Here, Jesus loves people. He loves everyone. No one is an object in His eyes.
2. Women gawk over shirtless guys all the time. Just because something isn't sexual to you, doesn't mean it's not an object of sexual pleasure to someone else.
3. If "object of sexual pleasure" is the standard by which something should be covered up, why does you mom ever show her face? I use that face for my sexual desires all the time. Cover it up.
But really, you should stop posting on the internet. Every post you make contributes to a worse society. Go offline and yell at the sky. It's better for you and everyone else. Thanks n
-
Originally Posted by
somebodyshotmypaw
If you don't understand the difference in body parts between men and women, then I can't help you. You should probably start by watching Kindergarten Cop. It does have some basic pointers to get you started.
I mean I understand that women find a well defined chest w/ abs "sexually appealing" as well. Seems you are forgetting that there is more than satisfying the male gaze here. Society shouldn't be built strictly for men and make women as objects. We've progressed the last 200+ years to show that.
-
Originally Posted by
Pancho
I think both ladies in this instance have more like what we'd call blisters and not big uns.
Yep ... kinda like a misdemeanor instead of a felony
OXFORD, Miss. (WTVA) - Ole Miss campus police ask students to behave at future baseball games following a recent incident.
The university said students were reportedly throwing rocks at Georgia baseball players during last weekend's series.
-
Originally Posted by
R2Dawg
You are correct Matt on all accounts.
Concerning that so many see no issues with this but not surprising.
Y'all think the sexualization of children in this country is happening in a vacuum?
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.