-
I wonder if Henderson should consider defensive replacements
Rowdy has had some defensive issues and he had just made the last out in the eighth .... shouldn?t he have been replaced by Poole who is a solid defensive player?
-
Replacing catcher saves 4-5 runs alone last night.
-

Originally Posted by
Ezsoil
Rowdy has had some defensive issues and he had just made the last out in the eighth .... shouldn?t he have been replaced by Poole who is a solid defensive player?
Ball hit about 8-10 feet up the wall. It would have been a hell of a play for him to make. And if we go into extras you want Tanner Poole in the game getting ABs?
Heck no. We are fine defensively. We crapped ourselves a little bit there at the end but that's not surprising. This isn't always going to look pretty. This team has overachieved to me so we are going to not look great sometimes. But Rowdey is fine.
-

Originally Posted by
MetEdDawg
Ball hit about 8-10 feet up the wall. It would have been a hell of a play for him to make. And if we go into extras you want Tanner Poole in the game getting ABs?
Heck no. We are fine defensively. We crapped ourselves a little bit there at the end but that's not surprising. This isn't always going to look pretty. This team has overachieved to me so we are going to not look great sometimes. But Rowdey is fine.
I won't say we're fine defensively. Seems we average about three errors a game.
-
Absolutely we should defensive sub in the 9th. Poole is a really bad hitter, but a plus defender. Poole should play the 9th when we have a lead
-

Originally Posted by
starkvegasdawg
I won't say we're fine defensively. Seems we average about three errors a game.
68 errors in 62 games. That's basically 1 per game. So let's not get carried away with having one bad defensive game.
-

Originally Posted by
Ezsoil
Rowdy has had some defensive issues and he had just made the last out in the eighth .... shouldn?t he have been replaced by Poole who is a solid defensive player?
Any poster who ever suggests putting Poole in the lineup should have all posting privileges revoked
-

Originally Posted by
msstate7
Absolutely we should defensive sub in the 9th. Poole is a really bad hitter, but a plus defender. Poole should play the 9th when we have a lead
Hell no. Ever. 2 years ago va Arizona, cohen took out rooker who hit 2 hrs and replac D by the kid whom promptly struck out after we gave up the lead
-

Originally Posted by
Ezsoil
Rowdy has had some defensive issues and he had just made the last out in the eighth .... shouldn?t he have been replaced by Poole who is a solid defensive player?
Poole is not an elite defender. Just because people keep saying it doesn't make it true. Poole & vansau do not deserve any more PT.
-

Originally Posted by
Rick Danko
Any poster who ever suggests putting Poole in the lineup should have all posting privileges revoked
This. If you have to make a defensive sub in the outfield, go with Anderson.
-
Some of you let seeing a guy struggle at the plate cloud your judgement on a guy's ability to play defense. Poole can go get em defensively. In the 9th with a lead, you want your best defenders on the field when you have your closer in the game. Poole tracks down that ball to LF in the 9th easily.
-

Originally Posted by
msstate7
Some of you let seeing a guy struggle at the plate cloud your judgement on a guy's ability to play defense. Poole can go get em defensively. In the 9th with a lead, you want your best defenders on the field when you have your closer in the game. Poole tracks down that ball to LF in the 9th easily.
Good god, just stop it. All due respect to Poole, I couldn?t hold his jock strap at this point in my life, but he is not an SEC player, and pulling a young player who could be the next star in MSU history because he didn?t have a rocket up his ass to make the catch off the fence last night is borderline insanse
-

Originally Posted by
Rick Danko
Good god, just stop it. All due respect to Poole, I couldn?t hold his jock strap at this point in my life, but he is not an SEC player, and pulling a young player who could be the next star in MSU history because he didn?t have a rocket up his ass to make the catch off the fence last night is borderline insanse
Rowdey is a star in the making. I love the kid, but he struggles in the OF. His fielding % is .951 (4 errors). This doesn't even tell the whole story bc he gets bad reads all the time on balls. This kid should play despite that though bc he can flat out smash. When you need 3 outs though with the CWS on the line, I play the better defender bc you take a glove to LF, not a bat
-

Originally Posted by
MetEdDawg
68 errors in 62 games. That's basically 1 per game. So let's not get carried away with having one bad defensive game.
We are 117th in the country in fielding percentage.
-

Originally Posted by
Ezsoil
Rowdy has had some defensive issues and he had just made the last out in the eighth .... shouldn?t he have been replaced by Poole who is a solid defensive player?
Yes, good call. Since Rowdy made the last out, that would have been a good decision to bring in Poole. Poole is 6'4, he would have made that catch rather easily. And to the other posters in this thread, Poole is definitely a plus defender.
-

Originally Posted by
Rick Danko
Any poster who ever suggests putting Poole in the lineup should have all posting privileges revoked
+1000
-

Originally Posted by
HoopsDawg
Yes, good call. Since Rowdy made the last out, that would have been a good decision to bring in Poole. Poole is 6'4, he would have made that catch rather easily. And to the other posters in this thread, Poole is definitely a plus defender.
Prepare to be attacked. Some posters here can't see that with 3 outs remaining with a lead, you make decisions based on defense not offense
-

Originally Posted by
msstate7
Prepare to be attacked. Some posters here can't see that with 3 outs remaining with a lead, you make decisions based on defense not offense
Truth. No way the game should have ended the way it did. Catch the pop up and win the game. The positive is maybe it deflated Vandy losing in that way yesterday.
-

Originally Posted by
preachermatt83
+1000
You are a habitual "over-pluser", but I agree +∞ in this case.
Rowdy roughly averages an error once ever 100 innings this season, which is not great but not definitely not something you should place much concern in either. Poole has no errors, but has played less than half the time Rowdy has played.
Rowdy has a .93 OPS while Poole has a .63 OPS, and Rowdy's in the past couple of months would be quite a bit higher. That is a substantial difference with the bat.
Last edited by sleepy dawg; 06-09-2018 at 11:58 AM.
-
That’s not on Rowdy. Its on the terrible relay throw to third.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.