Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 91

Thread: Lunardi's bracket updated today

  1. #21
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    74,799
    vCash
    10439
    Quote Originally Posted by Ifyouonlyknew View Post
    OM held Williams to 6pts on 3/10 shooting. He's a very good player but he's not invincible. He may score 20 but 2 out of his last 3 games he's scored 5 & 6 points. It's doable.
    We have really struggled lately defending the post.

  2. #22
    Senior Member MetEdDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Birmingham, AL
    Posts
    8,425
    vCash
    2610
    Quote Originally Posted by JoseBrown View Post
    Dang right it does, that?s who we are competing with for at-large bids.. why wouldn?t it matter.

    Just wondering, is Lunardi so accurate because he?s smarter than everyone else and computers, or is it because the committee just uses his bracket for the tourney minus any changes?
    Because about 63 or 64 of the picks are pretty easy to get. Auto bids plus RPI plus a few other indicators and all of us could get at worst 64 of the 68 teams.

  3. #23
    Senior Member Dawgology's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    6,592
    vCash
    52525
    Quote Originally Posted by smootness View Post
    If this were to happen, it absolutely would not be a guarantee we'd be in.
    We know....you keep posting it.....

    In truth, with a committee selection process you could win every single one of your games and not win your conference championship and you wouldn't be 100% guaranteed to be in...if you really want to start splitting hairs...

  4. #24
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,806
    vCash
    2610
    In the immortal words of Fats Waller, "One never knows, do one?"

  5. #25
    Senior Member MetEdDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Birmingham, AL
    Posts
    8,425
    vCash
    2610
    Only saving grace for us with a loss @LSU is if they end up a Top 75 RPI. That would be a loss to a Tier 1 which would help. Would still give us room in the SEC Tournament to make a run and get in.

    We desperately need SC to stay in the Top 75 RPI. Keeps our road win against them in Tier 1. We also need Arkansas to stay Top 30 RPI and it would help if Alabama and/or Mizzou could find a way to get back into the Top 30.

    We need as many Tier 1 wins as possible right now. Right now we are 3-6 in Tier 1 games. There's a lot of factors in play right now, but we need as good a record as possible against Tier 1 teams. If we can beat UT, beat LSU, and have a team like Bama finish Top 30 RPI, we could end up around 6-6 in Tier 1.

    To be honest, I don't care about what seed we are. If we win out things will take care of themselves. But we should NOT be rooting for conference standings interest. We should be rooting for RPI interest. The committee won't care whether we are 4 or 5. If we win our last 2 things will hash out however they hash out. The only way to help us is to bolster our resume and conference standings doesn't mean that much as is shown by the teams below us that are projected in the tournament.

  6. #26
    Senior Member Coach34's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    33,693
    vCash
    17200
    Quote Originally Posted by JoseBrown View Post
    Just wondering, is Lunardi so accurate because he’s smarter than everyone else and computers, or is it because the committee just uses his bracket for the tourney minus any changes?
    Lunardi is usually fairly close- but he always misses a couple each year
    Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is

  7. #27
    Senior Member Ari Gold's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    West coast
    Posts
    4,734
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Quaoarsking View Post
    Then we better win the while SECT or it's NIT for us.
    If we go 1-1 with a win against Tenn and make to sec finals and lose we in. That?s 1 prob 2 more quality wins
    Hell i think if go 1-1 with a Tenn win and win one tourney game we get in ( if that one win is a quality win)

  8. #28
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,806
    vCash
    2610
    Sometimes it seems winning tough conference games is just a detail. Why should they let that get in the way of punishing an athletic department for scheduling choices made years ago?

    If we had only lost a few more games to the right sort of teams, we'd be in like Flynt! (I hope this sounds as absurd as it really is.)

  9. #29
    Member Chinchilla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    60
    vCash
    6430
    Quote Originally Posted by JoseBrown View Post
    Dang right it does, that?s who we are competing with for at-large bids.. why wouldn?t it matter.

    Just wondering, is Lunardi so accurate because he?s smarter than everyone else and computers, or is it because the committee just uses his bracket for the tourney minus any changes?
    It's because the committee is very transparent and generally pretty consistent. Lunardi is not the only one that predicts the field with such accuracy. Even if he is the best (I honestly have no idea if he is), it's not by much.

  10. #30
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    1,561
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by MetEdDawg View Post
    Because about 63 or 64 of the picks are pretty easy to get. Auto bids plus RPI plus a few other indicators and all of us could get at worst 64 of the 68 teams.
    This. People pump up lunardi like he is a genius when anyone devoting all their time to this like him could do the same thing. ESPN always cites his % correct based on all 68 spots but it really comes down to picking 6 or so spots from about 10 teams and he gets 4 of the 6 right. (And yes, I'm just a hater who's jealous of his gig.)

  11. #31
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,806
    vCash
    2610
    Quote Originally Posted by RiverCityDawg View Post
    This. People pump up lunardi like he is a genius when anyone devoting all their time to this like him could do the same thing. ESPN always cites his % correct based on all 68 spots but it really comes down to picking 6 or so spots from about 10 teams and he gets 4 of the 6 right. (And yes, I'm just a hater who's jealous of his gig.)
    I will be impressed if he ever picks the field correctly in January.

  12. #32
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    13,271
    vCash
    3100
    I think we win both because I also think LSU loses to South Carolina. If we win tomorrow, no way we drop the game on the road to LSU. It will be a team with everything to play for who is motivated vs a freshman led meh team.

  13. #33
    Senior Member smootness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    15,210
    vCash
    3000
    Quote Originally Posted by Dawgology View Post
    We know....you keep posting it.....

    In truth, with a committee selection process you could win every single one of your games and not win your conference championship and you wouldn't be 100% guaranteed to be in...if you really want to start splitting hairs...
    I keep posting it because I keep seeing people saying, 'If we ___, we're in.'

    That response in particular was because he had said if we beat Tennessee, we're in...but he believes we'll lose to LSU...which would absolutely put our Tourney status up in the air.

  14. #34
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    1,276
    vCash
    2510
    Quote Originally Posted by msstate7 View Post
    We have really struggled lately defending the post.
    I feel like we defended Silva pretty well...

  15. #35
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    74,799
    vCash
    10439
    Quote Originally Posted by Covercorner2 View Post
    I feel like we defended Silva pretty well...
    Foul trouble was our best defense to Silva. Here are Silva numbers...

    24 mins, 11 pts (4-5 fg) 12 reb

  16. #36
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    1,276
    vCash
    2510
    Quote Originally Posted by msstate7 View Post
    Foul trouble was our best defense to Silva. Here are Silva numbers...

    24 mins, 11 pts (4-5 fg) 12 reb
    Foul trouble is part of it. Getting a guy in foul trouble is a gameplan.

  17. #37
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    689
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by preachermatt83 View Post
    We have to win tomorrow night and I just don't think we can beat Tennessee
    We see what you did there...

    Thanks!

  18. #38
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    3,039
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach34 View Post
    so the **** what? I posted it anyway. Deal with it dickhead
    HULK ANGRY! Cool down, brah.

  19. #39
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Gold, Mississippi
    Posts
    26,385
    vCash
    1094082
    We need to win our next 3 games and we need Texas, Baylor and Nebraska to suck the last two weeks.

  20. #40
    Senior Member smootness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    15,210
    vCash
    3000
    Quote Originally Posted by Dawg61 View Post
    We need to win our next 3 games and we need Texas, Baylor and Nebraska to suck the last two weeks.
    Texas and Baylor both have tough games this week. It is absolutely possible for both to go 0-2...but they're also set up to be helped by a good win or two.

    Nebraska's next game will be in the Big 10 Tournament against probably Michigan. A loss there would help us.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.