-
Originally Posted by
confucius say
I agree it has no bearing on this season or todays game. Does not mean that stating the idea that it was a good decision to keep Michael smith over him should not be called out as ridiculous.
As for this team, we will have to be dominant on the mound to be good. There is a reason Cann has started both speeches I?ve heard by discussing that our next 3 recruiting classes are all ranked top 2. That?s code for, patience, the talent is coming.
Yes, because keeping a player who can contribute more to the team over one who only has a higher batting average is ridiculous.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.
Reply With Quote