Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 36 of 36

Thread: Conference-only hitting stats

  1. #21
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    0
    vCash
    2610
    Belmont is 3/22 his last 6 games (includes Memphis)

    3/22

    You can't defend that

    8 K's in those 6

  2. #22
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    74,844
    vCash
    10439
    Quote Originally Posted by Random Poster View Post
    Belmont is 3/22 his last 6 games (includes Memphis)

    3/22

    You can't defend that

    8 K's in those 6
    Now that you're circling back to all games, he's .269/.350/.389.

  3. #23
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    0
    vCash
    2610
    3/22 the last 6

    6/36 since we started conference play and the competition got tougher. That's .167

    That's a very bad trend. You can't defend it. Either he gets it going soon or you move Stovall to 3B. And yes- Blaylock needs to get going or bench his ass too

  4. #24
    Senior Member Cooterpoot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    13,087
    vCash
    52714
    We have no one as good as Alexander to play 3B. Let's see how it goes once he's healthy. I have my doubts about his ability to hit the ball, but until he's healthy, I'm letting it ride.

  5. #25
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    74,844
    vCash
    10439
    When Stovall returns, you put him at 2b and replace blaylock with brown in OF imo

  6. #26
    Super Moderator CadaverDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    33,691
    vCash
    3002900
    Quote Originally Posted by Random Poster View Post
    3/22 the last 6

    6/36 since we started conference play and the competition got tougher. That's .167

    That's a very bad trend. You can't defend it. Either he gets it going soon or you move Stovall to 3B. And yes- Blaylock needs to get going or bench his ass too
    Alexander is still a better option than pretty much anything on our bench, while being a plus defender. If anything, when Stovall returns you put him at 2B, Cody in the outfield in Blaylock's spot, and leave LA at 3B. Alexander just needs some confidence...he hasn't had a good game in a while.

    So coach, if you decide to bench LA and Blaylock, who you gonna put in their spots? There's only 1 Stovall. Blaylock is hurting us more than LA right now, both play good D. Not disagreeing that in a perfect world we throw another Stovall or Gridley at 3B and another Cody in RF...but we don't have better options than LA. Stovall will go back to 2B and Cody to OF in Blaylock's spot if you ask me. That's the only logical way to do it. Stovall isn't a 3B anyway imo.

  7. #27
    Senior Member Tbonewannabe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    10,884
    vCash
    3500
    Quote Originally Posted by Cooterpoot View Post
    We have no one as good as Alexander to play 3B. Let's see how it goes once he's healthy. I have my doubts about his ability to hit the ball, but until he's healthy, I'm letting it ride.
    Maybe Alexander is this year's Holland. He might be so much better at defense that you take the struggles at the plate because the next 3rd baseman we have is Bragg who apparently is not up to par.

  8. #28
    Senior Member Jack Lambert's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    misippi
    Posts
    13,657
    vCash
    2238605444
    Seems like Gridley would be higher.

  9. #29
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    0
    vCash
    2610
    Quote Originally Posted by CadaverDawg View Post
    Alexander is still a better option than pretty much anything on our bench, while being a plus defender. If anything, when Stovall returns you put him at 2B, Cody in the outfield in Blaylock's spot, and leave LA at 3B. Alexander just needs some confidence...he hasn't had a good game in a while.

    So coach, if you decide to bench LA and Blaylock, who you gonna put in their spots? There's only 1 Stovall. Blaylock is hurting us more than LA right now, both play good D. Not disagreeing that in a perfect world we throw another Stovall or Gridley at 3B and another Cody in RF...but we don't have better options than LA. Stovall will go back to 2B and Cody to OF in Blaylock's spot if you ask me. That's the only logical way to do it. Stovall isn't a 3B anyway imo.
    Stovall to 3rd and give Bragg a chance to see if he can hit.

  10. #30
    Super Moderator CadaverDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    33,691
    vCash
    3002900
    Quote Originally Posted by Random Poster View Post
    Stovall to 3rd and give Bragg a chance to see if he can hit.
    In whose spot?

  11. #31
    Senior Member Todd4State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    43,565
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by Tbonewannabe View Post
    Maybe Alexander is this year's Holland. He might be so much better at defense that you take the struggles at the plate because the next 3rd baseman we have is Bragg who apparently is not up to par.
    I think it's Bragg's effort during games that's the problem right now.

  12. #32
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    3,038
    vCash
    3200
    Quote Originally Posted by CadaverDawg View Post
    Macnamee and Lovelady are far and away the most surprising on this list imo. Love to see who steps up. I'm disappointed in Blaylock...I thought he would be better at the plate. Struggles with offspeed stuff. Alexander swings at too many balls
    He and Luke both try and hit what they swing at to left field. Jake tries to hit every pitch. If he were a little selective he would bat 500.

  13. #33
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    17,506
    vCash
    2510
    Quote Originally Posted by CadaverDawg View Post
    In whose spot?
    Stovall to 3rd. MacNamee to LF. Bragg to DH.

  14. #34
    Super Moderator CadaverDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    33,691
    vCash
    3002900
    Quote Originally Posted by Percho View Post
    He and Luke both try and hit what they swing at to left field. Jake tries to hit every pitch. If he were a little selective he would bat 500.
    I agree

  15. #35
    Super Moderator CadaverDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    33,691
    vCash
    3002900
    Quote Originally Posted by HoopsDawg View Post
    Stovall to 3rd. MacNamee to LF. Bragg to DH.
    Bragg is no better than LA hitting so far, and worse defensively...but I agree that I wouldn't mind getting Bragg some ab's.

  16. #36
    Senior Member Todd4State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    43,565
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by CadaverDawg View Post
    Bragg is no better than LA hitting so far, and worse defensively...but I agree that I wouldn't mind getting Bragg some ab's.
    The only logical place I can see Bragg playing barring injuries is DH. But at the same time I think Cann likes the lineup he has been rolling out there and I don't think he wants to mess with it too much as long as we're winning. That's another reason why Stovall to second and Cody Brown to the OF in place of Blaylock makes a lot of sense given how good Stovall looked when healthy hitting in the 9 hole "in front" of Mangum. I expect Stovall to take a couple of weeks to get his swing back- but once he does having more runners on in front of Mangum, Rooker, and Gridley will make our offense that much better.

    The fact that Cann pulled Bragg out of the middle of a game and was willing to start Cody Oquendo at third when LA was hurt says a lot to me.

    Plus, I think LA will probably hit better as he heals up too- he still hit better than Gridley this weekend whether we count him missing first base or not.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.