Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 69

Thread: Thoughts on a Tony Romo for JJ Watt trade?

  1. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    434
    vCash
    3200
    Quote Originally Posted by missouridawg View Post
    Vikings, Cardinals, Denver, and Houston are all in this same boat. Super Bowl contenders with a healthy Romo.
    Carson Palmer is back for Arizona.

  2. #22
    Super Moderator CadaverDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    33,689
    vCash
    3002900
    Quote Originally Posted by louisvilledawg View Post
    The problem with that is that the Vikings already gave up their 2017 first round pick to the eagles for Sam Bradford. Don't think they go after him. Plus, Bradford had a hell of a season that no one talks about:

    He threw for almost 4,000 yards, 20(ish) tds, and like 5 interceptions. I think he also set some record for highest completion percentage. The reason the vikings sucked were not because of him. They sucked because of their OL and they had no viable rb once AP went down.
    And because Bradford didn't have any decent weapons around him due to a certain 1st round WR they were counting on from Ole Miss sucking ass.

  3. #23
    Super Moderator CadaverDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    33,689
    vCash
    3002900
    Quote Originally Posted by Maroons View Post
    Carson Palmer is back for Arizona.
    He sucks. Let me rephrase...he isn't winning them a Championship

  4. #24
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    74,799
    vCash
    10439
    Quote Originally Posted by louisvilledawg View Post
    The problem with that is that the Vikings already gave up their 2017 first round pick to the eagles for Sam Bradford. Don't think they go after him. Plus, Bradford had a hell of a season that no one talks about:

    He threw for almost 4,000 yards, 20(ish) tds, and like 5 interceptions. I think he also set some record for highest completion percentage. The reason the vikings sucked were not because of him. They sucked because of their OL and they had no viable rb once AP went down.
    I only watched the Vikings a few times this year and Bradford wasn't very impressive, so his stats surprise me. Honestly though, that just tells me romo would put up monster numbers there bc Bradford isn't in the same ballpark with a healthy romo imo

  5. #25
    Senior Member DancingRabbit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    2,732
    vCash
    3000
    Quote Originally Posted by CadaverDawg View Post
    Dak ought to see if the Boys would pay league minimum for Derunnya, ha. They had some chemistry.
    I read where Fred Ross has met with the Cowboys

  6. #26
    Senior Member smootness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    15,222
    vCash
    3000
    Quote Originally Posted by CadaverDawg View Post
    He sucks. Let me rephrase...he isn't winning them a Championship
    Well, let's be honest - neither is Romo.

  7. #27
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    2,694
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by smootness View Post
    If they're trading Watt, they can get much better than Romo.
    ^^^This

  8. #28
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    2,694
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by MafiaDawg View Post
    The cowboys should be able to get a TON for Romo. There are plenty of teams that need a legit starting qb.
    Yeah, and if any team trades for Romo, the chances of him becoming a legit starting QB for them is about 5%. He's old, has a terrible injury history, is way past his prime (and wasn't ever Brady / Peyton / Brees good to begin with), and has a bad contract. Not to mention he won't have nearly the same offensive supporting cast at a Minnesota, Houston, or Denver as he had in Dallas. His absolute ceiling is MAYBE a top 15 QB in the league at this point, and that is if he is able to stay healthy. Some team may be dumb enough to give up a lot for him, but it would have to be an extraordinary situation where they have literally every other position on the field locked down for 2017 only before a bunch of key guys head into free agency, and they want to roll the dice on a potential run while all pieces are in place. I don't think there is a team out there that fits that criteria.

  9. #29
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    74,799
    vCash
    10439
    Quote Originally Posted by HSVDawg View Post
    Yeah, and if any team trades for Romo, the chances of him becoming a legit starting QB for them is about 5%. He's old, has a terrible injury history, is way past his prime (and wasn't ever Brady / Peyton / Brees good to begin with), and has a bad contract. Not to mention he won't have nearly the same offensive supporting cast at a Minnesota, Houston, or Denver as he had in Dallas. His absolute ceiling is MAYBE a top 15 QB in the league at this point, and that is if he is able to stay healthy. Some team may be dumb enough to give up a lot for him, but it would have to be an extraordinary situation where they have literally every other position on the field locked down for 2017 only before a bunch of key guys head into free agency, and they want to roll the dice on a potential run while all pieces are in place. I don't think there is a team out there that fits that criteria.
    A healthy romo is much better than you give him credit for. In '14, he put up a qb rating of 113.2, which was the 7th best for a season ever and better than Brady's this year. He has a career qb rating of 97.1 which is 4th all time in NFL history. Health is a major concern though

  10. #30
    Senior Member THE Bruce Dickinson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Starkville, MS
    Posts
    1,292
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by missouridawg View Post
    AGe-wise... JJ is technically in his prime. But he has been injured quite a bit these past 2-3 years himself.
    I agree. Watt has also stated publicly that he may not be that far away from retirement.

    I Definitely think that this is the route the Cowboys should go though, but just for a more long term prospect. Von Miller Perhaps ?

  11. #31
    Senior Member Reason2succeed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    4,066
    vCash
    2610
    Quote Originally Posted by louisvilledawg View Post
    The problem with that is that the Vikings already gave up their 2017 first round pick to the eagles for Sam Bradford. Don't think they go after him. Plus, Bradford had a hell of a season that no one talks about:

    He threw for almost 4,000 yards, 20(ish) tds, and like 5 interceptions. I think he also set some record for highest completion percentage. The reason the vikings sucked were not because of him. They sucked because of their OL and they had no viable rb once AP went down.
    And AP is trying to play for the Cowboys or Texans. He lives just north of Houston.
    Death penalty or bust!!!***

  12. #32
    Senior Member smootness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    15,222
    vCash
    3000
    Quote Originally Posted by msstate7 View Post
    A healthy romo is much better than you give him credit for. In '14, he put up a qb rating of 113.2, which was the 7th best for a season ever and better than Brady's this year. He has a career qb rating of 97.1 which is 4th all time in NFL history. Health is a major concern though
    And he's won two playoff games.

    People are acting as though adding Romo can take these teams to championship level, which is kind of crazy. If Houston got him (and they definitely won't have to give up Watt to get him, that's crazy talk), you could make an argument they're a contender. Anybody else, that's not happening.

  13. #33
    Senior Member smootness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    15,222
    vCash
    3000
    Quote Originally Posted by THE Bruce Dickinson View Post
    I agree. Watt has also stated publicly that he may not be that far away from retirement.

    I Definitely think that this is the route the Cowboys should go though, but just for a more long term prospect. Von Miller Perhaps ?
    Goodness, people. The Cowboys are not getting one of the top handful of players in all of football for Tony Romo.

  14. #34
    Senior Member HereComesTheSpiral's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    2,651
    vCash
    3650
    It would take Romo and half of the OL to get Watt. Whitney Mercilus would be the person I would try to get in a trade.

  15. #35
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    11,947
    vCash
    3400
    Quote Originally Posted by Homedawg View Post
    That's just it, they can't. His contract is terrible for a team trading for him. Especially considering you know that they have to cut him anyway. They won't get any decent compensation for him at his age, injuries and salary cap structure age. And shouldn't.
    Is there not an equivalent defensive player somewhere out there? Somebody slightly pass their prime and/or injury prone, with a bad contract, but that still can offer a lot of value, even if there is some risk/reward to go with it?

    Or hell, isn't there a team with an overpaid player that needs to be cut? Package that player with some mid round draft picks and trade Dallas for Romo and some later round draft picks? Seems like enough teams need a QB that there would be a mutually beneficial trade to be made somewhere.

  16. #36
    Senior Member smootness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    15,222
    vCash
    3000
    Quote Originally Posted by HereComesTheSpiral View Post
    It would take Romo and half of the OL to get Watt. Whitney Mercilus would be the person I would try to get in a trade.
    Even that is likely a dream scenario. Romo is old, decrepit, and owed a lot of money. The Cowboys are basically just looking to dump his salary. Anything they get back is gravy. I'd guess a 3rd round pick is about the best they could do.

  17. #37
    Senior Member smootness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    15,222
    vCash
    3000
    Quote Originally Posted by Johnson85 View Post
    Is there not an equivalent defensive player somewhere out there? Somebody slightly pass their prime and/or injury prone, with a bad contract, but that still can offer a lot of value, even if there is some risk/reward to go with it?

    Or hell, isn't there a team with an overpaid player that needs to be cut? Package that player with some mid round draft picks and trade Dallas for Romo and some later round draft picks? Seems like enough teams need a QB that there would be a mutually beneficial trade to be made somewhere.
    The Cowboys want the contract off the books. Trading for a similarly overpaid player does them no good.

  18. #38
    Senior Member dogshiek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Tupelo
    Posts
    541
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by HereComesTheSpiral View Post
    It would take Romo and half of the OL to get Watt. Whitney Mercilus would be the person I would try to get in a trade.
    Romo reminds me of a quote of Sean Peyton about Reggie bush. "He's brittle ".
    "I ring cowbells at ballgames."

  19. #39
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    534
    vCash
    3200
    If the Texans traded watt to the cowboys it would be for Dak and somebody else not romo. Romo will get traded for about a fifth round pick just to get him off the payroll.

  20. #40
    Senior Member louisvilledawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    1,400
    vCash
    6632
    Quote Originally Posted by msstate7 View Post
    I only watched the Vikings a few times this year and Bradford wasn't very impressive, so his stats surprise me. Honestly though, that just tells me romo would put up monster numbers there bc Bradford isn't in the same ballpark with a healthy romo imo
    Completely agree - I just know it won't happen.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.