Page 5 of 10 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast
Results 81 to 100 of 185

Thread: Todd Grantham possible new DC?

  1. 01-10-2017, 02:46 PM #81
    maroonmania
    maroonmania is offline
    Senior Member maroonmania's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    20,309
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by Ifyouonlyknew View Post
    It's funny how fans are when you've been there for more than a couple of years. They don't appreciate what they have until it's gone.

    Todd Grantham Total Defense at UGA & Louisville

    2010 - UGA 23rd
    2011 - UGA 3rd
    2012 - UGA 27th
    2013 - UGA 45th
    2014 - Louisville 6th
    2015 - Louisville 18th
    2016 - Louisville 14th
    I find it amusing that we are critiquing those numbers from Grantham when we finished 110th in total defense this year
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 01-10-2017, 02:47 PM #82
    Dawg-gone-dawgs
    Dawg-gone-dawgs is offline
    Paysite Policeman Dawg-gone-dawgs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    5,207
    vCash
    3100
    No Signature
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 01-10-2017, 02:47 PM #83
    Coach007
    Coach007 is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    12,201
    vCash
    1003200
    Land him or not, Mullen has made the move to the 3-4.


    Personally, I think we have a shot at landing him.
    Whistleblower exposes: (FISA), Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, 156 other judges, members of Congress, and Donald J. Trump were targeted by the HAMMER.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 01-10-2017, 02:47 PM #84
    chainedup_Dawg
    chainedup_Dawg is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    894
    vCash
    3200
    Quote Originally Posted by maroonmania View Post
    I find it amusing that we are critiquing those numbers from Grantham when we finished 110th in total defense this year
    ^^THIS. Give me 45th in D this year and our outlook is completely different right now
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 01-10-2017, 02:48 PM #85
    Dawg-gone-dawgs
    Dawg-gone-dawgs is offline
    Paysite Policeman Dawg-gone-dawgs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    5,207
    vCash
    3100
    ^^THIS
    No Signature
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 01-10-2017, 02:48 PM #86
    dawgday166
    dawgday166 is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    8,831
    vCash
    3100
    nm
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 01-10-2017, 02:48 PM #87
    mstatefan91
    mstatefan91 is offline
    Senior Member mstatefan91's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    5,444
    vCash
    122431
    Quote Originally Posted by maroonmania View Post
    I find it amusing that we are critiquing those numbers from Grantham when we finished 110th in total defense this year


    I knew we were bad... didn't know we were THAT bad...
    LFC YNWA
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 01-10-2017, 02:50 PM #88
    tireddawg
    tireddawg is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    1,026
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach View Post
    Land him or not, Mullen has made the move to the 3-4.


    Personally, I think we have a shot at landing him.
    Why do you think we have a shot? Other than you usual positive sunshine pumping..
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 01-10-2017, 02:51 PM #89
    BrunswickDawg
    BrunswickDawg is offline
    Senior Member BrunswickDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Home of Slay, GA
    Posts
    12,293
    vCash
    1746501
    Quote Originally Posted by HoopsDawg View Post
    This is true. Grantham would be a huge upgrade over Sirmon. But if you talk to UGA people, they couldn't wait to get rid of him.
    UGA people couldn't wait to get rid of Richt, Bobo, Grantham, Willie Martinez, Schottenheimer, and on and on and on....
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 01-10-2017, 02:51 PM #90
    blacklistedbully
    blacklistedbully is offline
    Senior Member blacklistedbully's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    4,730
    vCash
    539554
    Though it's probably a pipe dream...I do wish we'd be willing to step up and pay a proven, top-notch DC the $ to come. If we had to pay $500,00 - $600,000 more per year than we do, it seems to me we could make a lot of that back if it allowed us to take the next step up and actually compete for the SEC more than once-a-decade...and actually make more prominent bowls with their higher payouts.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  11. 01-10-2017, 02:51 PM #91
    maroonmania
    maroonmania is offline
    Senior Member maroonmania's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    20,309
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by Ifyouonlyknew View Post
    This is such an overblown narrative. He got out of the way of Sirmon this year.
    Well then this is the one year he should have gotten IN the way.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  12. 01-10-2017, 02:53 PM #92
    TrapGame
    TrapGame is offline
    Senior Member TrapGame's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    13,674
    vCash
    4975
    Quote Originally Posted by chainedup_Dawg View Post
    ^^THIS. Give me 45th in D this year and our outlook is completely different right now
    Shit, we would have won 7 games at least.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  13. 01-10-2017, 02:54 PM #93
    mstatefan91
    mstatefan91 is offline
    Senior Member mstatefan91's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    5,444
    vCash
    122431
    Quote Originally Posted by TrapGame View Post
    Shit, we would have won 7 games at least.
    As it is, we should have won 8...
    LFC YNWA
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  14. 01-10-2017, 02:54 PM #94
    Dawgtini
    Dawgtini is offline
    Senior Member Dawgtini's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    1,280
    vCash
    4075
    Quote Originally Posted by maroonmania View Post
    I find it amusing that we are critiquing those numbers from Grantham when we finished 110th in total defense this year
    My thoughts exactly. I can't count how many posts I saw that said "if we just had a middle of the pack defense" or "if our defense was just average" and then how many more games we could've won. And I agree. Probably at least a couple more with just a #50 type defense.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  15. 01-10-2017, 02:55 PM #95
    TrapGame
    TrapGame is offline
    Senior Member TrapGame's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    13,674
    vCash
    4975
    Quote Originally Posted by blacklistedbully View Post
    Though it's probably a pipe dream...I do wish we'd be willing to step up and pay a proven, top-notch DC the $ to come. If we had to pay $500,00 - $600,000 more per year than we do, it seems to me we could make a lot of that back if it allowed us to take the next step up and actually compete for the SEC more than once-a-decade...and actually make more prominent bowls with their higher payouts.
    If we want to compete with LSU and Bama we have to make this type of hire.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  16. 01-10-2017, 02:57 PM #96
    JoseBrown
    JoseBrown is offline
    Senior Member JoseBrown's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    1,675
    vCash
    2705
    Quote Originally Posted by Ifyouonlyknew View Post
    This is such an overblown narrative. He got out of the way of Sirmon this year.
    He picked the wrong one to get out of the way of then...we can be so bassackwards...

    Same with the continuity narrative for keeping Sirmon. If you want continuity you don't do it with the worst DC. Not saying you were saying, just generally speaking about the narrative out of Starksville.
    You're blind if you can't see improvement.....Freshmens......Strain.....Kick rocks and pound sand......Drag my Yankee ass outta here!......
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  17. 01-10-2017, 02:58 PM #97
    Anonymous
    Anonymous is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    208
    vCash
    3100
    His brother also coaches at Louisville. Todd is DC and LB coach, Tony is the inside backer and special teams coach. If it's a package deal it would pretty well kill most of our birds with one stone.

    Find a safety and QB coach and call it a wrap.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  18. 01-10-2017, 02:59 PM #98
    JoseBrown
    JoseBrown is offline
    Senior Member JoseBrown's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    1,675
    vCash
    2705
    Quote Originally Posted by TrapGame View Post
    If we want to compete with LSU and Bama we have to make this type of hire.
    Ain't that the truth. If we wanna be a big boy, we have to act like a big boy.
    You're blind if you can't see improvement.....Freshmens......Strain.....Kick rocks and pound sand......Drag my Yankee ass outta here!......
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  19. 01-10-2017, 03:02 PM #99
    preachermatt83
    preachermatt83 is offline
    Our Pretentious Preacher preachermatt83's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    15,517
    vCash
    165086
    Anybody who don't believe Grantham would be a huge hire is insane.
    Romans 5:8
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  20. 01-10-2017, 03:04 PM #100
    ShotgunDawg
    ShotgunDawg is offline
    Senior Member ShotgunDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    37,277
    vCash
    3700
    Did Grantham ever have anything to do with Rivers or Abram at UGA?
    CAN'T PUT A SADDLE ON A MUSTANG

    Quit Your Bi$&$&?!, He's Not Going to Run the Ball More
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules

Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.