-

Originally Posted by
Random Poster
I and others said we should spend 5-10 minutes a practice on OM. Considering the team practices 2 hours- you realize that is a very small percentage of time? Nobody said completely ignore the other teams on our schedule.
Do you always get what people say wrong or just me?
Stop being a dickhead and just say what the **** it is you want to accomplish from your anti-Mullen stance. You want him fired? You want Hevesy fired? You want to get sideline passes every weekend and get the cheerleaders to touch your balls? You want MSU to hire you to be an assistant coach? When did your drink turn sour with Mullen and what is it that you want??
-

Originally Posted by
Random Poster
I and others said we should spend 5-10 minutes a practice on OM. Considering the team practices 2 hours- you realize that is a very small percentage of time? Nobody said completely ignore the other teams on our schedule.
Do you always get what people say wrong or just me?
He didn't get anything wrong with that post. He didn't specify you either. He said board and that's was exactly what several were posting.
-

Originally Posted by
Random Poster
Random is in no way, shape, or form saying that. I have said repeatedly that Mullen won't and shouldn't be fired
Yet you continue to stir it up.
-

Originally Posted by
Dawg61
Stop being a dickhead and just say what the **** it is you want to accomplish from your anti-Mullen stance. You want him fired? You want Hevesy fired? You want to get sideline passes every weekend and get the cheerleaders to touch your balls? You want MSU to hire you to be an assistant coach? When did your drink turn sour with Mullen and what is it that you want??
You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to Dawg61 again.
"Live every day like it was your last one.....And one day you're gonna be right"..Willie Nelson
-
He may or may not want Mullen fired. What he definitely wants is clicks, replies, posts, and traffic to the site and what better way than taking an opposing stance on everything.
-

Originally Posted by
BB30
He may or may not want Mullen fired. What he definitely wants is clicks, replies, posts, and traffic to the site and what better way than taking an opposing stance on everything.
Yup
-

Originally Posted by
msstate7
Since '11, lsu has scored 69 points in 7 games vs bama. 9.9 ppg
So your attempt to take up for Mullen is comparing him to probably the worst offensive team in the SEC besides Vandy. Yeah that says a lot. #DanTheMan
-

Originally Posted by
starkvegasdawg34
Not that it would have made the first bit of difference but I know in Saturday's game we left at least 17 points on the table we should have had if not for a missed FG and a couple of drops. I admit we had zero shot in that game, but the final score should have looked a little better if you can call 51-20 a little better. It just looks like all of our coaches and players go into that game pissing in their pants scared to death every year. We're beat mentally as soon as we step off the bus.
If the officials had called some holds early on Bama and we had capitalized on the situations you mentioned above, I think the score could have been something like 38-20 which is still a loss but a much closer loss. It was funny because on a film study that Jake Wimberly showed on Twitter regarding Alabama's blocking prowess it showed four holds and a block in the back. I'm sorry but if you're #1 in the country you shouldn't have to hold 99% of the time to create holes. Their OL is way overrated for what they do. It's not one of their better OLs.
-

Originally Posted by
Thick
That's exactly what I was saying in an earlier thread. Under Dan, the approach to Bama is simply "we expect to lose", and apparently that's fine with everybody. Against Bama, we play scared, and coach scared. If we are going to lose, let's go down fighting...trick plays, blitzing, onside kicks, fake punts, etc.
Yeah, but if we did that, we might lose by 48 points or more!!!! Oh.....wait.....
I agree it was the best approach in '14. Because a close loss didn't kill us. Every other year though....throw it 40 yards down the field every play and see what happens.
-

Originally Posted by
GTHOM
So your attempt to take up for Mullen is comparing him to probably the worst offensive team in the SEC besides Vandy. Yeah that says a lot. #DanTheMan
Since 2011 LSU has averaged ranking 7th in the league in scoring offense against conference only opponents. In 2011 they were one of the best offenses in the conference and was held to 9 points in 2 games.
-

Originally Posted by
HoopsDawg
Ole Miss put 43 on them THIS year.
Do you think they'd put 43 on them if they had to play them week 9 like LSU or week 10 like us? Do you think they'd have even sniffed winning this or the past two seasons? Not an excuse for our godawful defense Saturday, but as far as scoring points, it's undeniably a huge disadvantage to have to play that defense late in the season when it's at or close to its peak compared to teams that get to play them early in the year.
-

Originally Posted by
HoopsDawg
Ole Miss put 43 on them THIS year.
This is really what it's all about.
-
Junior Member

Originally Posted by
Really Clark?
Since 2011 LSU has averaged ranking 7th in the league in scoring offense against conference only opponents. In 2011 they were one of the best offenses in the conference and was held to 9 points in 2 games.
Why are we just mentioning LSU?
Bielema has put 57 points on them the last 3 years alone
Gus Bus has put 85 on them in the last 3 years
Tenn has put 44 on them the last 3 years
OM has lit them up
Other schools do indeed find ways to score on them
Last edited by Random Poster; 11-14-2016 at 02:06 PM.
-

Originally Posted by
Really Clark?
Since 2011 LSU has averaged ranking 7th in the league in scoring offense against conference only opponents. In 2011 they were one of the best offenses in the conference and was held to 9 points in 2 games.
We should have been better offensively than a guy who coached offense like Bo Schembechler
-
If we win the next two, there will be no staff changes and Mullen won't be under any pressure to make them. Same thing happened in 2013.
-

Originally Posted by
Random Poster
Why are we just mentioning LSU?
Bielema has put 57 points on them the last 3 years alone
Gus Bus has put 85 on them in the last 3 years
Tenn has put 44 on them the last 3 years
OM has lit them up
Other schools do indeed find ways to score on them
I only was responded to his idea that LSU offense was only better than Vandy since 2011. Not close to true. Didn't mention or get into anything else. Read what I wrote and what I responded to.
-

Originally Posted by
GTHOM
We should have been better offensively than a guy who coached offense like Bo Schembechler
I don't disagree necessarily but since 2011 they have not been as inept as perceived. Definitely not only better than Vandy
-
Originally Posted by BB30:
He may or may not want Mullen fired. What he definitely wants is clicks, replies, posts, and traffic to the site and what better way than taking an opposing stance on everything.

Originally Posted by
smootness
Yup
Needs to supplement that asst coach's salary at the academy school.
"Live every day like it was your last one.....And one day you're gonna be right"..Willie Nelson
-

Originally Posted by
Liverpooldawg
Random is basically saying unless we are in the Top 5 every year we need to get rid of Mullen. I wonder if his high school season is over will he resign this year?
Posted a fact. Spin to your agenda all you want.
-

Originally Posted by
the59dawg
Is anyone more constantly anti-Mullen than random?
I do my best.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.