Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345
Results 81 to 88 of 88

Thread: Hypothetical HC hire

  1. #81
    Senior Member maroonwhitedawg3ddd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    424
    vCash
    2900
    Strong out of that 5. Did pretty darn good at Louisville in over his head at TEXAS. Knows the south and Well respected in the Game.

  2. #82
    Senior Member DanDority's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Realville
    Posts
    1,483
    vCash
    109693
    Quote Originally Posted by scottycameron View Post
    I definitely don't want that earring wearing douche as our HC.
    What coach wears earrings?

  3. #83
    Senior Member DanDority's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Realville
    Posts
    1,483
    vCash
    109693
    Quote Originally Posted by DudyDawg View Post
    If rather go 3-9 than run a triple option.
    Wholy buckets! Are you crazy?

  4. #84
    Senior Member DanDority's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Realville
    Posts
    1,483
    vCash
    109693
    For those of you who are dead set against the offense that Navy and Georgia Tech run. Please tell me why. In MS we have some of the absolute best running athletes in the country. With that offense your opponent will be very likely ill prepared to face you week after week. Just look what took place with Houston this past week. You know that Houston has better players than Navy. However, had Navy not lost to Air force last week, they'd be in the possible play off picture. Now tell me, do you think a coach wants to have to prepare his players for that offense for one game, when he will likely not face it again the rest of the season. Hell no, he wants to face an average everyday ordinary offense that his team faces every week.

  5. #85
    Senior Member Really Clark?'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    13,041
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by DanDority View Post
    For those of you who are dead set against the offense that Navy and Georgia Tech run. Please tell me why. In MS we have some of the absolute best running athletes in the country. With that offense your opponent will be very likely ill prepared to face you week after week. Just look what took place with Houston this past week. You know that Houston has better players than Navy. However, had Navy not lost to Air force last week, they'd be in the possible play off picture. Now tell me, do you think a coach wants to have to prepare his players for that offense for one game, when he will likely not face it again the rest of the season. Hell no, he wants to face an average everyday ordinary offense that his team faces every week.
    You get down late they very seldom are able to come back. When playing teams that have time to prepare, like bowl games, they lose a high percentage of those games. Those teams don't run against SEC athletes on defense week end and week out. Maybe a legitimate dual threat option QB can keep the defense in check enough but a pure triple option against 8 SEC athletes in the box every week I believe would have a tough go.

  6. #86
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    74,797
    vCash
    10439
    Quote Originally Posted by Really Clark? View Post
    You get down late they very seldom are able to come back. When playing teams that have time to prepare, like bowl games, they lose a high percentage of those games. Those teams don't run against SEC athletes on defense week end and week out. Maybe a legitimate dual threat option QB can keep the defense in check enough but a pure triple option against 8 SEC athletes in the box every week I believe would have a tough go.
    I'm not so sure... sec teams are having to build defenses to stop passing teams these days, so I think defenses could struggle vs a pure running team with a very different blocking system.

    I know the ACC isn't the sec, but Georgia tech isn't one of the more talented ACC schools and Johnson is 39-29 in ACC play... that's including his worst year in his career last season at 1-7 in ACC play. That means going into year 8 at GT, Johnson was 38-22 in ACC play

  7. #87
    Senior Member AROB44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    1,821
    vCash
    3700
    Have you been talking to Emory on the other side?
    "Live every day like it was your last one.....And one day you're gonna be right"..Willie Nelson

  8. #88
    Senior Member Really Clark?'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    13,041
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by msstate7 View Post
    I'm not so sure... sec teams are having to build defenses to stop passing teams these days, so I think defenses could struggle vs a pure running team with a very different blocking system.

    I know the ACC isn't the sec, but Georgia tech isn't one of the more talented ACC schools and Johnson is 39-29 in ACC play... that's including his worst year in his career last season at 1-7 in ACC play. That means going into year 8 at GT, Johnson was 38-22 in ACC play
    He is 23-22 in conference play since 2010 through this season so far. He win totals since 2010 are 6, 8, 7, 7, 11, 3, and is 3-3 right now. His first two years and his 7th are his best years and his win percentage is .580 at GA Tech. Even if you don't adjust for stronger defenses that the SEC has on average VT traditionally has good defenses and a good DC. They have beat VT just once since 2010. I really think if he avg 7 wins per year for the last 6, then it's looks a lot like 6 wins on average at best with our division.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.