-
The 30-day extension is another lie
Ole Miss says in their letter that they responded to the NOA in April. Says they submitted their response to the NCAA in April.
According to the NCAA enforcement process, the University had 90 days to formally respond, and we submitted our Response to the Notice of Allegations (?Response?) in April. Around that same time, another involved party requested and received a 30-day extension. Because that extension has now elapsed, we are releasing our Response and the NOA to the public.
So the NCAA gets their response in April. At that point, Ole Miss is now waiting on the NCAA to deliver punishment.
So what's this 30 day extension? Ole Miss obviously didn't utilize a 30 day extension to May 20th because they responded in April.
They told us in April they would respond to the NCAA in May because of this extension - which wasn't really an extension because Ole Miss had already responded to the NCAA in April.
This was more smoke & mirrors. It was an excuse to release info on a holiday weekend where people presumably would pay less attention to the news.
Ole. Miss. Lied. Again. They had the public and media believing their NCAA response was delayed 30 days when in fact the response had already been submitted.
The NCAA boys in Indianapolis must have been laughing their asses off. It's too bad they can't talk.
Bjork may have just as well said they can't respond until the Easter Bunny delivers their papers to NCAA offices. The NCAA couldn't rebut it and it would make just as much sense.
I hope the judge in the Tunsil trial as well as the NCAA is seeing all this and is tired of their bullshit.
-
Hey, it's not their fault that it took them so long to redact all those names out of a 154 page document.
Death penalty or bust!!!***
-
I'm sure as the NCAA sees OM lying to media and the public, they become more skeptical about the truthfulness of OM's communications with the NCAA.
The school had until Friday to respond to the NCAA's notice of allegations, but a party other than Ole Miss has requested and received a 30-day delay, athletic director Ross Bjork said. This is the first and only extension allowed by the process.
"This extension is an often-used tool available to all parties and the Notice of Allegations itself has not changed in any way," Bjork said in a statement. "Upon completion of the 30-day extension period, the University will release our full Response to the Notice of Allegations."
-
Basically EVERYTHING they have said has been a lie...
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.