Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 25 of 25

Thread: Why College Baseball RPI is Flawed

  1. #21
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    827
    vCash
    13600
    Quote Originally Posted by smootness View Post
    You compared a team with a #25 RPI and the #2 SOS with a team with a #2 RPI and the #25 SOS. In that case, beating the team that is 2nd in the RPI is still going to help you more. Because they obviously have a much better record themselves than the team with the #25 RPI, and opponent winning % counts more than opponents' opponent winning %, which is where their SOS comes into play.

    And yes, if the #2 RPI team has the #25 SOS, they will absolutely have a phenomenal record. And definitely a much better record than the #25 team with a #2 SOS.
    So you think the higher the RPI the better the record will be? SMH. You're confusing a theoretical example and make way, way too many assumptions in these statements. Curious how you explain these situations...

    Maryland- 18-15, RPI 43, SOS 16, 54.5%WP
    Arizona - 20-12, RPI 64, SOS 73, 62.5%WP

    These 2 teams are 21 RPI spots apart and see nothing obvious about the higher RPI team having a better record.

    Another...

    Bryant - 20-6, RPI 29, SOS 165, 77% WP
    FSU - 22-8, RPI 5, SOS 1, 73% WP
    Last edited by Ralph; 04-12-2016 at 05:55 PM.

  2. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    339
    vCash
    13250
    My whole reaction to this thread and RPI is, huh? WTF? Just win and everything will be okay.

  3. #23
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    5,024
    vCash
    13200
    Road games matter: Minnesota is 17-10, highest RPI team they've played is 36 one time and they lost, and they are ranked 19th in RPI. But 22 of their 27 games have been away from home. They also have some pretty ugly losses mixed in.

  4. #24
    Senior Member smootness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    15,263
    vCash
    13000
    Quote Originally Posted by Ralph View Post
    So you think the higher the RPI the better the record will be? SMH. You're confusing a theoretical example and make way, way too many assumptions in these statements. Curious how you explain these situations...

    Maryland- 18-15, RPI 43, SOS 16, 54.5%WP
    Arizona - 20-12, RPI 64, SOS 73, 62.5%WP

    These 2 teams are 21 RPI spots apart and see nothing obvious about the higher RPI team having a better record.

    Another...

    Bryant - 20-6, RPI 29, SOS 165, 77% WP
    FSU - 22-8, RPI 5, SOS 1, 73% WP
    What on earth gave you the idea that I think RPI is based 100% on your record? Of course it isn't. I was comparing the two examples that you yourself used. You said it would be better to beat the #25 RPI team with a #2 SOS than the #2 RPI team with a #25 SOS, and that is incorrect. It is definitely better to beat the #2 RPI team in that case. Why? Because the #2 RPI team will absolutely have a much better record in that scenario than the #25 RPI team, and your opponents' record counts more than your opponents' opponents' record. That is simply a fact.

    Use the exact same examples there to logically assess your prior example. If SOS is so important that a team with a worse record can have a much better RPI based on SOS, then it also follows that if you have a worse SOS than another team but are much higher in the RPI, you have a much better record than they do.

  5. #25
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    827
    vCash
    13600
    Quote Originally Posted by smootness View Post
    What on earth gave you the idea that I think RPI is based 100% on your record? Of course it isn't. I was comparing the two examples that you yourself used. You said it would be better to beat the #25 RPI team with a #2 SOS than the #2 RPI team with a #25 SOS, and that is incorrect. It is definitely better to beat the #2 RPI team in that case. Why? Because the #2 RPI team will absolutely have a much better record in that scenario than the #25 RPI team, and your opponents' record counts more than your opponents' opponents' record. That is simply a fact.
    Simply not true at all. A team with a #2 RPI can have the same or worse record as the #25 RPI team. See Bryant/FSU example. FSU's RPI is #5, but Bryant's record is 4% better while being RPI #29. Why is FSU's RPI higher than Bryant's? Bc of FSU's SOS.

    Quote Originally Posted by smootness View Post
    Use the exact same examples there to logically assess your prior example. If SOS is so important that a team with a worse record can have a much better RPI based on SOS, then it also follows that if you have a worse SOS than another team but are much higher in the RPI, you have a much better record than they do.
    This is obvious. What you're not considering, using the Bryant/FSU example again, is the difference between FSU's win% and Bryant's win% is only 4% in Bryant's favor. While the difference in their SOS's is more like 15-20% in FSU's favor.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.