Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 24

Thread: Gonna use a blocking back this year

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    2,553
    vCash
    2889

    Gonna use a blocking back this year

    With Shumpert working there so far this spring and I think he will be damn good at it.

  2. #2
    Senior Member BB30's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Columbus, Ms
    Posts
    2,147
    vCash
    3523
    That is smart and good to see a change. Hopefully one of our young RBs will emerge as a stud we will need a lot more help on the ground next year with losing Dak.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    1,753
    vCash
    4114
    good

  4. #4
    General Public Political Hack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    General Public
    Posts
    17,420
    vCash
    7178
    That's some of the best news I've heard in a while.

  5. #5
    Senior Member ShotgunDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    37,277
    vCash
    3700
    This is great news!

    Take pressure off the new QB by getting physical again.

  6. #6
    LiL MissBitch alot sleepy dawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    103,036
    vCash
    6115850
    Quote Originally Posted by Political Hack View Post
    That's some of the best news I've heard in a while.
    ditto. I hope this is true. Whether we line him up as a fullback, or in a split-back, I will be excited to see what he can do there.

  7. #7
    Senior Member ShotgunDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    37,277
    vCash
    3700
    One question though: The NFL banned all chop blocks the other day. What does that mean for the future of being able to run the football?

    If the NCAA passes a rule banning all chop blocks in college football, I know Georgia Tech is screwed, but are we as well?

  8. #8
    Senior Member thf24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    3,543
    vCash
    3200
    Quote Originally Posted by ShotgunDawg View Post
    One question though: The NFL banned all chop blocks the other day. What does that mean for the future of being able to run the football?

    If the NCAA passes a rule banning all chop blocks in college football, I know Georgia Tech is screwed, but are we as well?
    I'm not sure it could get much stricter in college. I have no idea if the NCAA rule's wording is as strict as the NFL's new rule, but the NCAA already called it pretty liberally.

  9. #9
    Senior Member TrapGame's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    13,715
    vCash
    4975
    Hanrahan helped make our running game look elite in '09/'10. We need to get back to that.

  10. #10
    Senior Member dogshiek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Tupelo
    Posts
    541
    vCash
    3100
    Shump will be great as a fullback. He can help the running game and help protect our QB's. As straight up as he runs, we won't need to worry about him being called for a chop block!
    "I ring cowbells at ballgames."

  11. #11
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Gold, Mississippi
    Posts
    26,385
    vCash
    1094082
    Awesome!

  12. #12
    Senior Member Jack Lambert's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    misippi
    Posts
    13,657
    vCash
    2238605444
    Shumpert is not a running back but he is too good of a athlete to keep off the field. Great move.

  13. #13
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    827
    vCash
    3600
    Excellent news. Do y'all think we'll have a RB emerge as a feature back or RB by committee again?

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    120
    vCash
    3100
    Really hope this is true. Puts another good and experienced athlete on the field. With the lack of experience at TE it makes a lot of sense to pull back on the TE role and add more for a guy like Shump.

  15. #15
    That New Coach - That's better than the Old Coach
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    9,909
    vCash
    3190
    Dontavian Lee was also playing this same role.

  16. #16
    Senior Member Saltydog's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    8,735
    vCash
    3706

    Dak didn't run the ball a whole heckuva lot last year, yet he was still our leading

    rusher. That should tell you how bad our ground game was.
    "The QB and the receiver weren't on the same page there, but hey its only week eleven". (Jack Cristil)

  17. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    9,086
    vCash
    3083
    I've seen some flashes from Shump with the ball. Wouldn't surprise me to see a new level next season. Does this mean we always have three in the backfield? behind the center 5? I'll believe it when I see it.

    That said, I like the idea in principle. But I still think most snaps will occur with just the qb and one rb behind the front 5.

  18. #18
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    74,799
    vCash
    10439
    I like this bc we'll be able to sneak shump out for receptions some too

  19. #19
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    74,799
    vCash
    10439
    5 OL
    1 qb
    1 Rb
    1 h-back
    3 wr's or 2 wr's and 1 te?

  20. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    17,475
    vCash
    2510
    Quote Originally Posted by msstate7 View Post
    5 OL
    1 qb
    1 Rb
    1 h-back
    3 wr's or 2 wr's and 1 te?
    Mullen's first 2 years it was mainly 3 WR's. But you can mix it up. Even put Justin Johnson in the slot and overload a side. Having 2 backs really allows you to be more creative in the run game.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.