Quote Originally Posted by engie View Post
It's not that we lose guys -- it's that we lose guys that we want to keep to lateral moves.

If we were losing the underperformers at an equal rate instead of keeping them entire tenures -- I'd be 100% fine with everything that's happening. Just hate to keep losing good coaches while coaches that I think much lower of manage to stick around and get raises...

This all day. If he left to go be a DC or even an HC, then sure go for it. But this move is lateral at best and if the reports are true he's taking less money.