Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 61 to 72 of 72

Thread: NOA Part Duex'

  1. #61
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    1,656
    vCash
    3100
    Rosebowl had a great podcast today where he talked about some of this. http://www.bulldogsportsradio.com/ep...-day-rankings/

  2. #62
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    579
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by MSUDawg99 View Post
    Rosebowl had a great podcast today where he talked about some of this. http://www.bulldogsportsradio.com/ep...-day-rankings/
    CLIFF NOTES?

  3. #63
    Senior Member Reason2succeed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    4,066
    vCash
    2610
    Since all the rebels are here getting their news regarding their NCAA NOA from the most accurate and trusted OM news source, Elitedawgs, I would just like to say welcome and CLICK AN AD!!!!
    Death penalty or bust!!!***

  4. #64
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Cypress, TX
    Posts
    6,253
    vCash
    333074958
    If everyone gets a show cause, Ole Miss has no choice but to fire him. We they could still pay him, but he couldn't coach.

    The real H-bomb would be to show cause everyone. Coaches, and AD's

  5. #65
    General Public Political Hack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    General Public
    Posts
    17,426
    vCash
    7178
    Quote Originally Posted by SheltonChoked View Post
    If everyone gets a show cause, Ole Miss has no choice but to fire him. We they could still pay him, but he couldn't coach.

    The real H-bomb would be to show cause everyone. Coaches, and AD's
    That would potentially be worse than the death penalty. I suppose since a former AD was involved that wouldn't necessarily be off the table.

  6. #66
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    99
    vCash
    3100
    The problem with the whole second letter theory is the fact that the Tunsil violations would not have been included on the original NOA if there was a 2nd NOA coming. That wouldn't make sense.

  7. #67
    Senior Member starkvegasdawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Eye of the Storm
    Posts
    22,968
    vCash
    3275
    Why? There's rumored to be plenty more for a second NOA. The fact that the investigation is ongoing tells you there's more. If they were done and no more charges pending then Th investigation would not be ongoing. There's still this entire recruiting class to wade through plus the kimcheech stuff.

  8. #68
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    167
    vCash
    1003289
    Quote Originally Posted by Where'sWaldo View Post
    The problem with the whole second letter theory is the fact that the Tunsil violations would not have been included on the original NOA if there was a 2nd NOA coming. That wouldn't make sense.
    At least if the letters are separated by the dates of the violations. That's my biggest problem with the 2nd letter rumors; there is no obvious separation of the allegations since both Tunsil and Saunders seem to be mentioned in this first NOA.

  9. #69
    Senior Member Coach34's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    33,807
    vCash
    17200
    every article now says the investigation is still ongoing. If it was over- it would say so and is just waiting on the OM response to the allegations.
    Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is

  10. #70
    Senior Member yjnkdawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    5,049
    vCash
    3287
    Quote Originally Posted by Where'sWaldo View Post
    The problem with the whole second letter theory is the fact that the Tunsil violations would not have been included on the original NOA if there was a 2nd NOA coming. That wouldn't make sense.
    If there is still an ongoing investigation, as has been indicated and appears obviously there is one, and if the Tunsil's investigation has been completed, then why couldn't his violations be in the first NOA?

  11. #71
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    167
    vCash
    1003289
    I completely agree that the investigation is ongoing. The question isn't whether they are still investigating TSUN, it's whether they already have material that will be part of a 2nd letter (and apparently purposely part of a 2nd letter instead of included in the first NOA). If they have proof of additional allegations, rather than simply still investigating to look for more, why are they waiting to release the info in a 2nd letter? The prevailing theories dealt with the NCAA rules change on how much the staff is to blame (aka, pre- and post-2013 or whenever) or the separation of academic vs other violations, but since Saunders and Tunsil are supposedly mentioned in this first NOA, neither seem like a satisfactory argument.

  12. #72
    Senior Member Really Clark?'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    13,053
    vCash
    3100
    Y'all have to understand that Tunsil, and Hampton for that matter which should be also included at the same time, are eligibility issues of players already on the team. Those violations are different than actual staff violations which also have different guidlines now. So a separate investigation could overlap the years if the second investigation is centering around the staff and rouge boosters with violations concerning impermissible benefits for recruiting. That would be under the newer guidlines that puts much more emphasis on the head coach controlling the program. Show cause along with LOIC would surround that program with a black cloud.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.