Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 85

Thread: So Steve says today..

  1. #21
    Senior Member whosyourdawgy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Brandon, MS
    Posts
    1,370
    vCash
    3200
    Those damn recruits better be careful leaving Oxford on Sunday. Some crazy ass criminal is gonna follow them home and stop em and steal the red backpacks I'm halfway joking but if they are giving serious cash out during these weekends some nut job is bound to catch on and take advantage
    Last edited by whosyourdawgy; 01-20-2016 at 11:54 PM.

  2. #22
    Senior Member starkvegasdawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Eye of the Storm
    Posts
    22,945
    vCash
    3275
    The driver will make sure they get home safely.

  3. #23
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    1,686
    vCash
    3100

    question for coach 34

    Coach 34....what would be more detrimental to the football team, to have many infractions against multiple sports or some against just the football team? Or is there any way of knowing?
    Last edited by lastmajordog; 01-21-2016 at 08:41 AM. Reason: wrong quote

  4. #24
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    1,686
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by whosyourdawgy View Post
    Those damn recruits better be careful leaving Oxford on Sunday. Some crazy ass criminal is gonna follow them home and stop em and steal the red backpacks I'm halfway joking but if they are giving serious cash out during these weekends some nut job is bound to catch on and take advantage
    Criminal's or business savvy hookers.......

  5. #25
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    74,799
    vCash
    10439
    Quote Originally Posted by lastmajordog View Post
    Coach 34....what would be more detrimental to the football team, to have many infractions against multiple sports or some against just the football team? Or is there any way of knowing?
    I'm no expert by any means, but I think it's whether the ncaa charges you with lack of institutional control or not

  6. #26
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    58
    vCash
    3100
    I wonder how this big winter storm moving in will affect their weekend

  7. #27
    Senior Member Coach34's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    33,696
    vCash
    17200
    Quote Originally Posted by lastmajordog View Post
    Coach 34....what would be more detrimental to the football team, to have many infractions against multiple sports or some against just the football team? Or is there any way of knowing?
    You obviously want as many infractions against football as possible- but if they really are looking at multiple violations under multiple staffs and AD's- lack of institutional control is best. More severe penalties.

    The OM people are trying to spin it as its nothing really in football- just old stuff under Nutt- but thats supposedly not the case at all.
    Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is

  8. #28
    Senior Member jimbo352's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Columbus
    Posts
    318
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach34 View Post
    You obviously want as many infractions against football as possible- but if they really are looking at multiple violations under multiple staffs and AD's- lack of institutional control is best. More severe penalties.

    The OM people are trying to spin it as its nothing really in football- just old stuff under Nutt- but thats supposedly not the case at all.
    Infractions against current coaching staff/ad is the key here as far as the football team being punished. Hopefully the current admin can't pin most of the shit on the last staff and ad....

    All of those mystery injuries/sickness excuses for players sitting out games last year could have been them trying to save face under the current investgation.

    A ton of rumors out there right now, if half sticks, and new/old staffs are both found "guilty" i think they'll recieve significant sanctions.

  9. #29
    Head Elitedawg Croot Reporter
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    469
    vCash
    2850
    I wonder if men's basketball and the ex softball coach recruiting trips will ever go public

  10. #30
    Senior Member maroonmania's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    20,315
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by jimbo352 View Post
    Infractions against current coaching staff/ad is the key here as far as the football team being punished. Hopefully the current admin can't pin most of the shit on the last staff and ad....

    All of those mystery injuries/sickness excuses for players sitting out games last year could have been them trying to save face under the current investgation.

    A ton of rumors out there right now, if half sticks, and new/old staffs are both found "guilty" i think they'll recieve significant sanctions.
    Not sure why they should get any less punishment if most of the violations were under Nutt. Its not like they got rid of Nutt because they were trying to clean up their program, he only got canned because of losing. CJ Johnson was one of the most obvious, in your face illegal recruitment/flips of the past 10 years. I certainly wouldn't want them to get off lightly on that (if its even part of the allegations) just because that happened under Nutt. Its STILL the same network.

  11. #31
    Senior Member shoeless joe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    3,690
    vCash
    3129
    Quote Originally Posted by Entodawg View Post
    I wonder how this big winter storm moving in will affect their weekend
    Freeze better get on his direct line and make sure it doesn't get as bad as some forecasts say.

  12. #32
    Senior Member Bubb Rubb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    2,200
    vCash
    2610
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach34 View Post
    The OM people are trying to spin it as its nothing really in football- just old stuff under Nutt- but thats supposedly not the case at all.
    The problem with this is that the current head coach was part of that stuff with Nutt. And the Saunders stuff overlaps.

    The bigger problem is this: once the NCAA gets into your kitchen, they start looking at more stuff. They have or will find stuff from the current staff. Even the most rebelly of rebels are acknowledging that there will be a slew of secondary violations - things that they quickly spin by saying that "everyone reports secondary violations." The problem is that you have major violations, particularly around academic fraud, in multiple sports spanning ADs and coaching staffs. Secondary violations on top of that will make that snowball get quickly out of control.

    We know about Saunders. The guy got an 8 year show clause (!) based on what they stumbled on at ULL while looking into his time at Ole Miss. We know about Tunsil and Hampton (the players served suspension, but the institution still will have sanctions - that's not over). We know about the women's basketball stuff. There's a lot of stuff we don't know and that should be scary to the Rebs. But what we do know is enough to nail them.

    My Rebel friends who are connected acknowledge that probation is coming but it will be minor. They say the Tunsil and Hampton stuff is over, and the NCAA found nothing else, despite three years of digging. They say that Saunders did not give the NCAA anything on Ole Miss. Maybe they are right, but the smoke (and the logic) suggests otherwise.

    If I were a Rebel I would be very concerned that a guy like Rosebowl would put himself on the line like this if nothing were to come of it. My Rebel friends assert that it's a coordinated MSU effort to damage recruiting. Again, we shall see.

  13. #33
    Senior Member DancingRabbit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    2,732
    vCash
    3000
    Bubb Rubb, Freeze was not part of the Nutt staff. He was with Orgeron.

    Freeze did work with Saunders, who worked for both Orgeron and Nutt.

  14. #34
    Senior Member Bubb Rubb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    2,200
    vCash
    2610
    Quote Originally Posted by DancingRabbit View Post
    Bubb Rubb, Freeze was not part of the Nutt staff. He was with Orgeron.

    Freeze did work with Saunders, who worked for both Orgeron and Nutt.
    You are correct. I incorrectly over-generalized the situation. They are looking at stuff from previous staffs as we have heard, with Saunders being the constant, and it's a problem because Freeze has a connection with him. That's how I should have said it.

  15. #35
    Senior Member maroonmania's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    20,315
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by Bubb Rubb View Post
    The problem with this is that the current head coach was part of that stuff with Nutt. And the Saunders stuff overlaps.

    The bigger problem is this: once the NCAA gets into your kitchen, they start looking at more stuff. They have or will find stuff from the current staff. Even the most rebelly of rebels are acknowledging that there will be a slew of secondary violations - things that they quickly spin by saying that "everyone reports secondary violations." The problem is that you have major violations, particularly around academic fraud, in multiple sports spanning ADs and coaching staffs. Secondary violations on top of that will make that snowball get quickly out of control.

    We know about Saunders. The guy got an 8 year show clause (!) based on what they stumbled on at ULL while looking into his time at Ole Miss. We know about Tunsil and Hampton (the players served suspension, but the institution still will have sanctions - that's not over). We know about the women's basketball stuff. There's a lot of stuff we don't know and that should be scary to the Rebs. But what we do know is enough to nail them.

    My Rebel friends who are connected acknowledge that probation is coming but it will be minor. They say the Tunsil and Hampton stuff is over, and the NCAA found nothing else, despite three years of digging. They say that Saunders did not give the NCAA anything on Ole Miss. Maybe they are right, but the smoke (and the logic) suggests otherwise.

    If I were a Rebel I would be very concerned that a guy like Rosebowl would put himself on the line like this if nothing were to come of it. My Rebel friends assert that it's a coordinated MSU effort to damage recruiting. Again, we shall see.
    So Tunsil's Stepfather spent hours with the NCAA spilling his guts (supposedly) to everything that went on in Tunsil's recruitment and they got NOTHING? If he didn't spill his guts maybe they were just swapping fishing stories during all that time.
    Last edited by maroonmania; 01-21-2016 at 11:11 AM.

  16. #36
    Senior Member Coach34's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    33,696
    vCash
    17200
    The NCAA didn't meet with Tunsil's step-dad twice for no reason. They spin it as "he sat 7 games- that's the end of it." Oh no no no- the reason he sat 7 games is what is going to get them in trouble.

    People led also need to ask themselves this:

    Do you think Rosebowl would be so confident and act the way he does if it didn't come from someone credible? I think our administration knows all about it- and is leaking it thru Steve and others to get the word out. I've never seen info like this being pushed out- and it's consistent info. Plus you have what's been said in the ULL documents that implicates them as well
    Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is

  17. #37
    Senior Member Bubb Rubb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    2,200
    vCash
    2610
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach34 View Post
    The NCAA didn't meet with Tunsil's step-dad twice for no reason. They spin it as "he sat 7 games- that's the end of it." Oh no no no- the reason he sat 7 games is what is going to get them in trouble.

    People led also need to ask themselves this:

    Do you think Rosebowl would be so confident and act the way he does if it didn't come from someone credible? I think our administration knows all about it- and is leaking it thru Steve and others to get the word out. I've never seen info like this being pushed out- and it's consistent info. Plus you have what's been said in the ULL documents that implicates them as well
    And again, this is just stuff we know about so far, and it's enough to do damage. There's tons of stuff out there that's been speculated for a long time that is hanging over their heads too.

  18. #38
    Senior Member Big4Dawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    2,107
    vCash
    2610
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach34 View Post
    The NCAA didn't meet with Tunsil's step-dad twice for no reason. They spin it as "he sat 7 games- that's the end of it." Oh no no no- the reason he sat 7 games is what is going to get them in trouble.

    People led also need to ask themselves this:

    Do you think Rosebowl would be so confident and act the way he does if it didn't come from someone credible? I think our administration knows all about it- and is leaking it thru Steve and others to get the word out. I've never seen info like this being pushed out- and it's consistent info. Plus you have what's been said in the ULL documents that implicates them as well
    Now we just need Steve & Paul to ask recruits during interviews "What do you think about the rumored NCAA infractions around the OM program and does that have any affect on your recruitment?" We know Yancy would.

  19. #39
    Senior Member DancingRabbit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    2,732
    vCash
    3000
    During the Freeze era have there been any sketchy qualifiers that took their ACT at Waynesboro?

  20. #40
    Senior Member BossDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    1,358
    vCash
    3200
    Quote Originally Posted by Big4Dawg View Post
    Now we just need Steve & Paul to ask recruits during interviews "What do you think about the rumored NCAA infractions around the OM program and does that have any affect on your recruitment?" We know Yancy would.
    Indeed. They need to be asked about it every day.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.