Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 28

Thread: Appears St. Louis is losing Rams to Inglewood....

  1. #1
    Founder of Summer's Eve
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    8,447
    vCash
    3663

    Appears St. Louis is losing Rams to Inglewood....

    Per reports.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    10,493
    vCash
    3200
    San Diego too. 2 teams to LA.

  3. #3
    Senior Member War Machine Dawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    N5 London Colney
    Posts
    10,566
    vCash
    3921
    2 teams in LA is one too many. I have no idea why SD wants to move. They're in a great location and have good fans. Gotta suck to be a football fan in St. Louis, though. Second time they're losing a franchise. I'd be pissed as hell at the owners if I were a fan of either of these two teams. No telling how long it will be before they get franchises again. And even when/if they do, they'll suck for years as bottom feeders trying to put together a competitive roster.
    It's the roller coaster of hope that this program keeps us on that makes it hell being a State fan. - CadaverDawg, 10/15/22


  4. #4
    Founder of Summer's Eve
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    8,447
    vCash
    3663
    Quote Originally Posted by War Machine Dawg View Post
    2 teams in LA is one too many. I have no idea why SD wants to move. They're in a great location and have good fans. Gotta suck to be a football fan in St. Louis, though. Second time they're losing a franchise. I'd be pissed as hell at the owners if I were a fan of either of these two teams. No telling how long it will be before they get franchises again. And even when/if they do, they'll suck for years as bottom feeders trying to put together a competitive roster.
    Any chance the NFL has expansion in mind with allowing these moves? They've been wanting to expand into Europe for a while. They could also expand in this hemisphere in Mexico and canada. Not sure how feasible it would be and how they would add/rearrange the divisions. Just extremely odd that the NFL allows city hopping like this while other sports seem to shun it.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    4,113
    vCash
    3200
    I do hate the chargers are moving. I think for them it was a stadium issue?

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    464
    vCash
    3700
    So does drafting Michael Sam make a little more sense now ? I think it`s called "quid pro quo".

  7. #7
    Senior Member coastratdog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    440
    vCash
    3210
    Didn't St. Louis come from LA? So basically they are going home.

  8. #8
    Senior Member Todd4State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    43,490
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by coastratdog View Post
    Didn't St. Louis come from LA? So basically they are going home.
    Yes.

    And what I would like to see happen is the Jaguars move from Jacksonville to St. Louis.

    That way the AFC South would be Indianapolis, Houston, Nashville, and St. Louis.

    And actually the Chargers started out in Los Angeles too.

  9. #9
    Senior Member Todd4State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    43,490
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by War Machine Dawg View Post
    2 teams in LA is one too many. I have no idea why SD wants to move. They're in a great location and have good fans. Gotta suck to be a football fan in St. Louis, though. Second time they're losing a franchise. I'd be pissed as hell at the owners if I were a fan of either of these two teams. No telling how long it will be before they get franchises again. And even when/if they do, they'll suck for years as bottom feeders trying to put together a competitive roster.
    St. Louis also got screwed over when the NFL expanded and awarded teams to Charlotte and Jacksonville. Walter Payton headed up the St. Louis expansion football team bid back in the 90's as well.

    San Diego is at least driving distance to LA I would think.

  10. #10
    Senior Member Todd4State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    43,490
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by RougeDawg View Post
    Any chance the NFL has expansion in mind with allowing these moves? They've been wanting to expand into Europe for a while. They could also expand in this hemisphere in Mexico and canada. Not sure how feasible it would be and how they would add/rearrange the divisions. Just extremely odd that the NFL allows city hopping like this while other sports seem to shun it.
    I'm pretty sure you are right. The thing about the NFL is it is perfectly symmetrical right now and changing would make scheduling kind of complicated.

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    10,493
    vCash
    3200
    Quote Originally Posted by Irondawg View Post
    I do hate the chargers are moving. I think for them it was a stadium issue?
    I have no idea why the San Diego didn't build a new stadium, a decade ago.

  12. #12
    Senior Member bobcat91's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    967
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by Todd4State View Post
    St. Louis also got screwed over when the NFL expanded and awarded teams to Charlotte and Jacksonville. Walter Payton headed up the St. Louis expansion football team bid back in the 90's as well.

    San Diego is at least driving distance to LA I would think.

    ST Louis didn't get screwed. Charlotte was a done deal for years. The area had 10 million people within 100 miles and the finisher: the NFL was in financial difficulty in the 19 80s and Bank of America loaned them enough to be solvent until tv contracts started to explode. BOA is headquartered in Charlotte.

    Jacksonville was selected due to the exploding Florida market. St Louis has zero going for it.

  13. #13
    General Public Political Hack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    General Public
    Posts
    17,417
    vCash
    7178
    ST Louis is one large earthquake away from not existing. LA isn't much better, but the city won't definitely cease to exist. St. Louis and Memphis won't be here in 200 years.

    I say move the Rams, but I can't believe SD is moving.

  14. #14
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    847
    vCash
    3100
    The Rams belong in Los Angeles.

  15. #15
    Senior Member Todd4State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    43,490
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by bobcat91 View Post
    ST Louis didn't get screwed. Charlotte was a done deal for years. The area had 10 million people within 100 miles and the finisher: the NFL was in financial difficulty in the 19 80s and Bank of America loaned them enough to be solvent until tv contracts started to explode. BOA is headquartered in Charlotte.

    Jacksonville was selected due to the exploding Florida market. St Louis has zero going for it.
    The exploding market where they already had two teams?

    St. Louis is the 19th largest metropolitan area in the U.S. Jacksonville is 40th.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o...tistical_Areas

  16. #16
    Senior Member Todd4State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    43,490
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by Political Hack View Post
    ST Louis is one large earthquake away from not existing. LA isn't much better, but the city won't definitely cease to exist. St. Louis and Memphis won't be here in 200 years.
    I say move the Rams, but I can't believe SD is moving.
    What?

    That's the most Denver Airport post I've ever seen from you.

  17. #17
    Senior Member bobcat91's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    967
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by Todd4State View Post
    The exploding market where they already had two teams?

    St. Louis is the 19th largest metropolitan area in the U.S. Jacksonville is 40th.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o...tistical_Areas
    I get that it's a great baseball town and you're a fan, but per capital income between the two can't be compared and the only thing St Louis is better at is riots.

  18. #18
    Senior Member Todd4State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    43,490
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by bobcat91 View Post
    I get that it's a great baseball town and you're a fan, but per capital income between the two can't be compared and the only thing St Louis is better at is riots.
    Classy. Especially considering you are probably from Mississippi.


    If Jacksonville is exploding so much, how come the NBA and MLS aren't expanding there? They have the Jaguars and a freaking AA baseball team- just like Jackson and Biloxi. St. Louis has the Cardinals, they have the NHL team, and they likely are going to get a MLS team in the next five years or so.

    And as far as per capita income- you obviously haven't seen Ladue, Mo.

    At the end of the day this about the Rams moving back to their home in Los Angeles- which I am fine with to be honest with you. But at the same time St. Louis is a NFL city as well and has supported some mostly horrible football teams. I feel the same way about San Diego as well. The Chargers should stay there IMO.

  19. #19
    Senior Member bobcat91's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    967
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by Todd4State View Post
    Classy. Especially considering you are probably from Mississippi.


    If Jacksonville is exploding so much, how come the NBA and MLS aren't expanding there? They have the Jaguars and a freaking AA baseball team- just like Jackson and Biloxi. St. Louis has the Cardinals, they have the NHL team, and they likely are going to get a MLS team in the next five years or so.

    And as far as per capita income- you obviously haven't seen Ladue, Mo.

    At the end of the day this about the Rams moving back to their home in Los Angeles- which I am fine with to be honest with you. But at the same time St. Louis is a NFL city as well and has supported some mostly horrible football teams. I feel the same way about San Diego as well. The Chargers should stay there IMO.
    St Louis didn't get screwed in the last expansion, but yes they did get screwed today. The NFL is about greed and gold. There is not enough of it for them and it lead to this garbage that happened today. The NFL will wake up one day soon and find out that no one is buying their product anymore because no one can afford it. Not today, not in a year or two, but soon. When the NFL family of 4 spends $400-800 in tickets, $35 in parking, $100 in concessions, etc, it cost a family of 4 around a grand to watch a game. They are killing the goose that killed the golden egg, but are too greedy to notice. I watch the pro leagues. I go to and love the college games.

  20. #20
    Senior Member War Machine Dawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    N5 London Colney
    Posts
    10,566
    vCash
    3921
    Quote Originally Posted by Political Hack View Post
    ST Louis is one large earthquake away from not existing. LA isn't much better, but the city won't definitely cease to exist. St. Louis and Memphis won't be here in 200 years.

    I say move the Rams, but I can't believe SD is moving.
    There's a better chance football, at least as we know it, won't exist in 25 years. All the concussion shit have gotten the lawyers and liberals involved. It's just a matter of time now. Hell, it's already borderline unwatchable with all the "player safety" rules being added every year for the sake of bolstering offense, which is what it's really all about. Those in charge don't give a shit about "player safety."
    It's the roller coaster of hope that this program keeps us on that makes it hell being a State fan. - CadaverDawg, 10/15/22


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.