Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Boring Saturday thread: Top MSU QBs of the modern era.......

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    3,221
    vCash
    3700

    Boring Saturday thread: Top MSU QBs of the modern era.......

    Let's say the Jackie Era on, instead of 1992, so we can leave Sleepy on there, who's obviously the #1. Your choices:

    Sleepy Robinson
    Todd Jordan
    Greg Plump
    Derrick Taite
    Matt Wyatt
    Wayne Madkin
    Kevin Fant
    Omarr Conner
    Michael Henig
    Wes Carroll
    Tyson Lee
    Chris Relf
    Tyler Russell

    I'm talking total package. Production, wins, talent, everything.

    The reason I do this.....Tyson Lee really was an under-rated QB for us. He made 2 bad plays in his career....sliding at La. Tech right before halftime and not getting the first down, and Dead Indians Debacle.

    I think it's Sleepy, Madkin, Relf, Lee, Russell. Taite not far behind. Russell has a chance to be #1 after this year.

  2. #2
    Senior Member FlabLoser's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    N/A
    Posts
    3,648
    vCash
    3330
    Give me Omar Conner in Mullen's offense. I think. Hard to say - I don't remember how his passing was and how much of that can be blamed on Croom.

  3. #3
    Senior Member ShotgunDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    37,277
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by FlabLoser View Post
    Give me Omar Conner in Mullen's offense. I think. Hard to say - I don't remember how his passing was and how much of that can be blamed on Croom.
    I agree. Is Omar Conner in Mullen's offense an acceptable answer? That may have been the single biggest waste of talent to ever come through this program. Conner should have been all SEC in the right scheme

  4. #4
    Senior Member starkvegasdawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Eye of the Storm
    Posts
    22,947
    vCash
    3275
    No Favre***

  5. #5
    Senior Member MetEdDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Birmingham, AL
    Posts
    8,425
    vCash
    2610

    That offense under Conner was amazingly bad.

    He shouldn't have even played QB that year, but Henig went down game 1 against SC and Rutland went down and we had nothing left but Conner. Add to that the fact he was injured diving in the endzone at UAB in overtime to win that ballgame, which we should have lost, and he really never had a chance to succeed that year. He could barely stand in the Egg Bowl and we still managed to have a chance to win that game. Plus we had Prosser, Jamayel Smith, Aubrey Bell, Tony Burks, Lance Long, and Brandon McRae at WR. Definitely not the best to have ever walked through MSU.

    Conner could have done well under Mullen, but I still think our offense will always work best with a true passing threat at QB that can really throw the ball around, not just an athlete. That's why Relf managed to do so well during the 9-4 year. He had the speed and size to beat you, but he was an accurate enough passer that year where defenses couldn't key on the run.

    I've only been an MSU fan since 2006 when I started going to MSU, but I would say during my time, our offense was clicking best and was most fun to watch when Relf was on his game and we were running a well balanced attack. Now Russell is probably the best, but Relf did some really great things under Mullen and surpassed every MSU fan's expectations.
    Last edited by MetEdDawg; 08-24-2013 at 12:38 PM.

  6. #6
    General Public Political Hack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    General Public
    Posts
    17,420
    vCash
    7178
    Matt Wyatt running the read option.*****

    1) Tyler
    2) Fant

    I don't care what offense we're running, I want a gun slinger in the pocket. A QB who can make every pass opens up the entire field.

    I don't usually knock players but given the debates I'll share my thoughts on Dak... he can't make all the throws accurately which allows defenses to stack the box... which pretty much negates the benefits of having a QB who can run.

  7. #7
    Senior Member TaleofTwoDogs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Mississippi
    Posts
    1,569
    vCash
    116183
    Madkin for wins, Russell for arm, Fant for guts

  8. #8
    Senior Member Coach34's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    33,737
    vCash
    17200
    Sleepy running the Spread Option
    Conner running the Spread Option
    Fant
    Russell
    Madkin running the Spread Option
    Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is

  9. #9
    Senior Member Coach34's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    33,737
    vCash
    17200
    Quote Originally Posted by Political Hack View Post

    I don't usually knock players but given the debates I'll share my thoughts on Dak... he can't make all the throws accurately which allows defenses to stack the box... which pretty much negates the benefits of having a QB who can run.
    Dakota has already shown himself to be a better passer than Relf- and Relf threw for almost 2,000 yards in 2010...I dont worry about Dakota making enough throws to keep the safeties honest after watching Relf for 2 years almost be able to do it
    Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is

  10. #10
    General Public Political Hack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    General Public
    Posts
    17,420
    vCash
    7178
    I never really considered Madkin a good runner. He was probably the most clutch QB we've ever had though.

    Mr. Clutch - Madkin
    Pocket QB - Russell
    Mr. Comeback - Wyatt
    Cannon - Fant
    Toughness - Henig
    Athleticism - Conner
    Heart - Lee
    Lay it on the line - Sleepy
    Truck a LB - Relf

  11. #11
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Pocahontas, Mississippi
    Posts
    11,648
    vCash
    1540588
    Quote Originally Posted by Political Hack View Post
    M
    I don't usually knock players but given the debates I'll share my thoughts on Dak... he can't make all the throws accurately which allows defenses to stack the box... which pretty much negates the benefits of having a QB who can run.
    I disagree. If Relf could just complete 1 or 2 passes, it opened the running game up tremendously. He didn't have to look like Tyler back there. Dak is a better passer than Relf so I think he will keep the defense honest on every play.

  12. #12
    Senior Member bgdog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    255
    vCash
    3625
    Quote Originally Posted by Political Hack View Post
    Truck a LB - Relf
    An LB? Sure. A tiny DB? **** no.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Fc3KgRPsqo

  13. #13
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    3,221
    vCash
    3700
    Vomit

  14. #14
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    3,221
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by MetEdDawg View Post
    Conner could have done well under Mullen, but I still think our offense will always work best with a true passing threat at QB that can really throw the ball around, not just an athlete.
    Conner could throw the ball amazingly well on the run. Everything Croom did with him played to his weaknesses. He had him gain weight, work on nothing but straight drop-backs, etc. It was awful. Conner may be the biggest wasted talent in MSU history. The fact that Henig saw the field at all was mind-boggling.

    Croom had TWO good offensive gameplans his entire time at MSU. 2004 Florida and 2007 at Kentucky, both ended in wins.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.