Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: Tidbit on the Adidas bats...

  1. #1
    Senior Member maroonmania's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    20,310
    vCash
    3700

    Tidbit on the Adidas bats...

    From the Hail State blog we get this:

    "Interesting. Cohen was asked about the adidas bats, said that the players used them (and other bats) in some testing and they chose the adidas bats. Players like them."

    So it was a player choice to go with the Adidas bats? I had never heard that. Still not convinced they are up to par with Easton or Demarini.

  2. #2
    Senior Member Todd4State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    43,488
    vCash
    3700
    Engie can correct me if I'm wrong- but allegedly the Adidas prototypes were a lot more live than the actual product.

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    3,505
    vCash
    3100
    Since he whines about DNF so much why don't we move the fences in when we build the new park. 320-355-380-355-305 and have a couple powerful lefties to AJ Reed that shit

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    69
    vCash
    3200
    Quote Originally Posted by maroonmania View Post
    From the Hail State blog we get this:

    "Interesting. Cohen was asked about the adidas bats, said that the players used them (and other bats) in some testing and they chose the adidas bats. Players like them."

    So it was a player choice to go with the Adidas bats? I had never heard that. Still not convinced they are up to par with Easton or Demarini.
    i doubt the results would have been much different, it has more to do with player swinging the stick than the stick itself.

  5. #5
    Senior Member maroonmania's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    20,310
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by bulldawg989 View Post
    i doubt the results would have been much different, it has more to do with player swinging the stick than the stick itself.
    True overall, but I just don't like seeing us continue to use a product that apparently no other P5 baseball program deems worth using.

  6. #6
    Senior Member ShotgunDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    37,277
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by Todd4State View Post
    Engie can correct me if I'm wrong- but allegedly the Adidas prototypes were a lot more live than the actual product.
    You can't be serious Todd.

  7. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    827
    vCash
    3600
    Either the bats tested were more lively or his comment is total BS. If players are choosing Adidas bats then why aren't more teams using them?

  8. #8
    Senior Member engie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    8,518
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by ShotgunDawg View Post
    You can't be serious Todd.
    Why wouldn't he be? It's really common sense. Build prototypes on the ragged edge of BBCOR standards. If they get hotter as they get older, as many of the BBCOR-era bats are doing, so what? Just a couple hundred in existence that can be easily and quietly replaced after failing the tests. When you go past prototyping into production -- and there are thousands if not tens or hundreds of thousands of them out there -- failed BBCOR tests would be a big deal that could easily bankrupt an individual arm of a company. Adidas cut the nuts off the bats between prototype and production stage

    Yes, we "chose" the Adidas bats on the front end. They were not forced on us. The prototypes were hot enough for us to break a 25 year relationship with Easton. The production units, not so much. Cohen needs to have a retest this year. There was sour grapes in the beginning about us using them around the SEC. Todd and others here can confirm that I actually got this info about the prototype bats from opposition inside the SEC. We talked about it behind the scenes at the time. And that opposing coach even theorized at the time that there was no way those bats in that configuration would make it to the production line because of what I highlighted in the first paragraph.

  9. #9
    Senior Member ShotgunDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    37,277
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by engie View Post
    Why wouldn't he be? It's really common sense. Build prototypes on the ragged edge of BBCOR standards. If they get hotter as they get older, as many of the BBCOR-era bats are doing, so what? Just a couple hundred in existence that can be easily and quietly replaced after failing the tests. When you go past prototyping into production -- and there are thousands if not tens or hundreds of thousands of them out there -- failed BBCOR tests would be a big deal that could easily bankrupt an individual arm of a company. Adidas cut the nuts off the bats between prototype and production stage

    Yes, we "chose" the Adidas bats on the front end. They were not forced on us. The prototypes were hot enough for us to break a 25 year relationship with Easton. The production units, not so much. Cohen needs to have a retest this year. There was sour grapes in the beginning about us using them around the SEC. Todd and others here can confirm that I actually got this info about the prototype bats from opposition inside the SEC. We talked about it behind the scenes at the time. And that opposing coach even theorized at the time that there was no way those bats in that configuration would make it to the production line because of what I highlighted in the first paragraph.
    So let me get this straight, you think Adidas has attempted to trick MSU?

  10. #10
    Senior Member Really Clark?'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    13,042
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by ShotgunDawg View Post
    So let me get this straight, you think Adidas has attempted to trick MSU?
    That's not just an Addias thing. Hot prototypes have been around for a long long time. Easton was notorious for this way back in the day of Alum bats. It was just easier to build production models back then closer to prototype specs because of the lack of governing. But I have seen prototypes on the edge of standards before they are even broke in.
    Last edited by Really Clark?; 06-02-2015 at 03:07 PM.

  11. #11
    Senior Member engie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    8,518
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by ShotgunDawg View Post
    So let me get this straight, you think Adidas has attempted to trick MSU?
    They didn't attempt to "trick" anyone. Prototypes are never the same as production units. Do I think they were forthcoming about the changes they were making between the two? I do not. Do I think we asked the right questions and forced them to answer that question? I don't know either way. They wanted the defending national runner ups who had just shown the greatest in-person fan support Omaha has ever seen to use their product, and they were probably going to do whatever it took at the time to make that happen. I can't fault them for handling it how they did -- nor do I fault us for doing what we did. Wish we had kept using prototypes, but fully understand the black eye on all their bats that would have happened had our bats failed a cert test. Nevermind the stink that would have come about had people seen that our versions were different from what was publicly available(is that even legal in the NCAA?).

    That said, we're enough of a power program with a clean enough slate given our offensive struggles to start with a clean slate on equipment and go from there. I'm thinking and hoping that we will do just that. If the bats were very good, more people would be using them by now. Didn't take very long for DeMarini to carve their niche.

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    101,302
    vCash
    3800
    Sounds like Tom Brady was involved to me.

  13. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    63
    vCash
    3100
    Sounds like you bug the shit out of Head for information.

  14. #14
    Senior Member ScottH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    1,564
    vCash
    3100
    Also depends what they were tested against.

    Is it a ncaa requirement all players on team use same brand or a function of individual bat contract with school?

  15. #15
    Senior Member messageboardsuperhero's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    4,209
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by engie View Post
    Why wouldn't he be? It's really common sense. Build prototypes on the ragged edge of BBCOR standards. If they get hotter as they get older, as many of the BBCOR-era bats are doing, so what? Just a couple hundred in existence that can be easily and quietly replaced after failing the tests. When you go past prototyping into production -- and there are thousands if not tens or hundreds of thousands of them out there -- failed BBCOR tests would be a big deal that could easily bankrupt an individual arm of a company. Adidas cut the nuts off the bats between prototype and production stage

    Yes, we "chose" the Adidas bats on the front end. They were not forced on us. The prototypes were hot enough for us to break a 25 year relationship with Easton. The production units, not so much. Cohen needs to have a retest this year. There was sour grapes in the beginning about us using them around the SEC. Todd and others here can confirm that I actually got this info about the prototype bats from opposition inside the SEC. We talked about it behind the scenes at the time. And that opposing coach even theorized at the time that there was no way those bats in that configuration would make it to the production line because of what I highlighted in the first paragraph.
    I do remember hearing rumblings at the time about how other coaches weren't happy about us using the new Adidas bats because they were supposed to be hotter than the other bats. At the time, I was almost concerned they'd take the bats away from us and make us use another brand.

    Obviously something changed with the bats between the time our players raved about the prototypes and now complain about the finished product.

    ETA: I'd like to see us use DeMarini if possible.
    Last edited by messageboardsuperhero; 06-02-2015 at 04:29 PM.

  16. #16
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Gold, Mississippi
    Posts
    26,385
    vCash
    1094082
    Quote Originally Posted by Martianlander View Post
    Sounds like Tom Brady was involved to me.
    Lol!! Can we start calling them Adidas Shats instead of Adidas Bats please

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.