If they moved the students back where they used to sit, I would be in full support of reseating the Hump a year early. We reached a point of seating equilibrium a few years ago where folks were mostly staying in or near where they were already sitting during the annual reseating. We moved from equilibrium to apathy and that led to the 3 year plan that was messaged. My take is it was messaged, but it wasn't a contractual commitment. However, I wouldn't change it unless we are willing to move the students back where they used to be. That change could be sited as being for the good of the program and atmosphere and not about money or the handful of folks who will whine about a broken promise.

I've got seats in the lower level where the students used to sit so I would have to move and would have no issue doing so. A competitive team and the excitement around the program will bring the Hump back next year. Taking an additional step to place the students back where they belong could amp it up to a level it hasn't seen in close to a decade.