-
Does OM even have a redshirt program?
-

Originally Posted by
HancockCountyDog
Their boat has sprung a leak, more details to come.
Richmond is supposed to visit TN this weekend. Be great if he would flip to them.
-
Senior Member
Looking at 247 we have 3 recruits that are rated:
89 (4*)
88 (3*)
88 (3*)
What's the freaking difference? I hate when everyone freaks out about stars. Just look at their offers and realize they are good players
-
A high school ref says if you knew how many unrated players were 3*, how many two's were 3 and four; how many three's should be unrated, how many 4 stars should be three's, and why all the fives should remain 5's or at least fours we would better understand why all the big budget schools play for the National Championship regularly while the other 90 percent of the schools fight like hell to remain either relevant or semi relevant each year which is now, more recently,, worth a lot of money.
ETA: stars do matter while at the same time the rating services are terrible at rating the mass of humanity in HS football that are truly 3* and under
We were ranked Number One this past season for five weeks straight with what our previous four recruiting classes ranked. You have to recruit well but it's so damn subjective and luck matters too, whether you're a good evaluator or a good recruiter.
Last edited by Schultzy; 01-28-2015 at 08:31 PM.
-

Originally Posted by
yjnkdawg
Richmond is supposed to visit TN this weekend. Be great if he would flip to them.
Several more of their commits are visiting.
Recuitapalooza didn't work.
-
Senior Member

Originally Posted by
Tdawg
I've already made my thoughts on the recruiting issue clear--Dan is almost beyond reproach with his on-field results. But, for example, if Ole Miss ends up with 9 top players to our 6, then that is a HUGE difference. Them getting 50% more "blue chip" recruits than us is a lot. Over 4-5 years, that is 12-15 more good players--if you believe in stars
The main reason they are getting the hype is because of the top end talent, especially if they get the other two that are leaning their way. Sure, it does not sound as bad saying OM is getting 9 top 300 compared to MSU getting 6. BUT, they hype and difference is OM could be signing 5 top 100 compared to MSU signing 1.
Last edited by Alldawg; 01-29-2015 at 09:07 AM.
-

Originally Posted by
CadaverDawg
Just looked at the "Top 247" prospects according to 247, and the totals are...
Ole Miss: 6 in the top 247
MSU: 4 in the top 247
Better? Still basically the same and maintains my point.
Yep better for making your argument... Even though I now see why you went with ESPN. While they are the worst at evaluating talent, they do have the biggest network that gets airtime for schools based off of their horrible rankings.
-
So if Leo flips we will be tied with them on 4 star or better on all the services except scout?!?!?
That makes me want him to flip even more
And remind me who does YP write for?
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.