Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 28

Thread: Ready for baseball

  1. #1
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    74,839
    vCash
    10439

    Ready for baseball

    Who are our starters in field most likely? Starting pitchers?

  2. #2
    Senior Member MsStateBaseball's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    1,498
    vCash
    3200
    1B-Rea
    2B-Holland
    SS-Heck
    3B-Britton
    C-Collins
    LF-Hump
    CF-Robson/Smith
    RF-Brown
    DH-Rooker/Reynolds
    Spots will switch depending on L/R matchup.

    Starters are Preston Brown, Lucas Laster for sure. Other spot may be Fr. Jesse McCord or So. Dakota Hudson.

  3. #3
    Senior Member engie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    8,518
    vCash
    3700
    That's 3 extra "power" bats than we started last year. We need Brown, Collins, Heck, and Britton to have improved a lot at the plate as well.

    This could be the first time since 2011 that the offense is the strength of the club...

  4. #4
    General Public Political Hack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    General Public
    Posts
    17,423
    vCash
    7178
    Quote Originally Posted by engie View Post
    That's 3 extra "power" bats than we started last year. We need Brown, Collins, Heck, and Britton to have improved a lot at the plate as well.

    This could be the first time since 2011 that the offense is the strength of the club...
    I was actually thinking the infield looked really solid defensively. Maybe that's a good sign.

  5. #5
    Senior Member MsStateBaseball's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    1,498
    vCash
    3200
    I made this prediction a few weeks ago: I think we will be really good. The defense will be superb and the offense (once it gets untracked-cold weather might hinder) will be better than we have had in years. I'm not really concerned about the starters bc there is real talent there, it is the bullpen with lack of experience and swagger. But that may change once they get going and stop looking for Holder to come in and save the day.

  6. #6
    Senior Member DudyDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Owner of Burnley Football Club
    Posts
    5,243
    vCash
    3000
    Thought the talk was heck to second and holland at short?
    Lineup looks really good defensively and really should be a good offensive group. Especially w the new balls.

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    36
    vCash
    3100
    Did Hump get some reps in the OF this past fall?

  8. #8
    Denver Airport Director
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    13,471
    vCash
    2610
    What's the deal with Dakota Hudson and Austin Sexton?

  9. #9
    Senior Member BeardoMSU's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    The gettin' place
    Posts
    19,843
    vCash
    53100
    Our ability to move Slim back to the pen is huge, IMO.

    Who is slated to be the closer? Or is will that be committee?

  10. #10
    Senior Member DudyDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Owner of Burnley Football Club
    Posts
    5,243
    vCash
    3000
    Quote Originally Posted by BeardoMSU View Post
    Our ability to move Slim back to the pen is huge, IMO.

    Who is slated to be the closer? Or is will that be committee?
    Talked about who will close last night at the basketball game (yeah, it was more entertaining). Tatum would be good. Heard Fitts from someone on here but not sure I agree with that. Think he would be a good middle reliever. Maybe it will have to be commitee

  11. #11
    Senior Member MetEdDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Birmingham, AL
    Posts
    8,426
    vCash
    2610
    I like the potential this team has. This team has the makings of one that grows into a very very good ball club. It's already pretty solid, but there is a lot of youth here.

    I think we've got a really good mix of power and contact and defensively we should be really solid. My two biggest keys are:

    1) What does Wes Rea give us? If he can go back to being that oppo machine with 2 strikes and get some better balance at the plate, he will have a really good year. Less strikeouts, more balls in play.

    2) Can we solidify the 3rd starter spot? We need someone to step up into that spot and provide some consistency. I like Brown and I like Laster at 1-2, but McCord or Hudson has to step up and be a solid 3 for us.

    I think we will score some runs and I think we will be very solid defensively. But if we can solidify those two things i mentioned we will be a very difficult team to beat by season's end.

  12. #12
    Senior Member maroonmania's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    20,353
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by DudyDawg View Post
    Thought the talk was heck to second and holland at short?
    Lineup looks really good defensively and really should be a good offensive group. Especially w the new balls.
    Tried to tell you guys last year that Heck was likely not going to move. After a guy has shown himself to be as solid and consistent at SS as Heck showed last year you don't just willy-nilly move him to another infield position.

  13. #13
    Senior Member engie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    8,518
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by jgunn View Post
    Did Hump get some reps in the OF this past fall?
    Basically all he played this fall, I believe...

  14. #14
    Senior Member engie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    8,518
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by maroonmania View Post
    Tried to tell you guys last year that Heck was likely not going to move. After a guy has shown himself to be as solid and consistent at SS as Heck showed last year you don't just willy-nilly move him to another infield position.
    Cohen has stated it both ways in different interviews. The move from SS to 2B or viceversa isn't all that drastic really...

    Ultimately, we've got to do both what is best for the team -- and what is best for kids' futures. Heck's arm strength limits him as a SS at the next level, and he most likely projects to 2B. So, if you've got a guy with better range and significantly more arm strength in Holland, who has already proven himself as a CWS shortstop as a true freshman, why not go ahead and make that move?

    If Holland is not as good in some way or either is not comfortable with it, I'm good with leaving it how it is...

  15. #15
    Senior Member MsStateBaseball's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    1,498
    vCash
    3200
    Butch has said Fitts and Tatum are the closers. Right and left.

  16. #16
    Senior Member MsStateBaseball's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    1,498
    vCash
    3200
    Hump only played 3B when he had to in the fall. By all indications, he is playing LF and DH. In 2016, I see him playing more at 1B bc that is his draft year. He will be like his brother, OF and 1B.

  17. #17
    Senior Member MsStateBaseball's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    1,498
    vCash
    3200
    The 3rd spot is crowded at the moment. Hudson, Sexton, McCord are the leaders from what I believe. Butch said McCord could be Sunday starter by middle-end of season. Again, we need 5 starters bc durability is an issue. And they won't always go 6 innings. The Tuesday starter is still sort of a tryout for the weekend. Hudson who can be a 1st rounder is still working on his arm angle, etc. that Butch has taught him.

  18. #18
    Senior Member maroonmania's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    20,353
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by engie View Post
    Cohen has stated it both ways in different interviews. The move from SS to 2B or viceversa isn't all that drastic really...

    Ultimately, we've got to do both what is best for the team -- and what is best for kids' futures. Heck's arm strength limits him as a SS at the next level, and he most likely projects to 2B. So, if you've got a guy with better range and significantly more arm strength in Holland, who has already proven himself as a CWS shortstop as a true freshman, why not go ahead and make that move?

    If Holland is not as good in some way or either is not comfortable with it, I'm good with leaving it how it is...
    I understand your point and I've never actually seen Holland play SS so maybe he's great there. However, I would hate to see us do a Britton move again where we place a guy at SS with supposedly better physical tools than Heck but can't handle the complex ins and outs of the SS position in a consistent manner like Heck does. Consistent fielding of the ball, making accurate throws, knowing how to position yourself and being captain of the infield are all more important than just whether or not a guy has the absolute strongest arm of all available infielders.

  19. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    1,561
    vCash
    3100
    You're leaving out Vickerson. He was a frustrating player during most of last season, but had a great postseason, summer and fall. Plus, Cohen loves the guy. Wouldn't be surprised to see him starting in left and Hump at DH or vice versa.

  20. #20
    Senior Member WeWonItAll(Most)'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Starkville
    Posts
    2,791
    vCash
    6163
    Our pitching is going to be weak compared to where it's been the past few years. Our bats are going to have to pick up the slack

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.