-
Originally Posted by
Bulldogbeing
Have a feeling we wouldn't fair well if this happened.
I totally disagree. Having to re-match a team is probably one of the most difficult things for the team that wins the first match. Not to mention it would be on a neutral field.
-
I believe 12 SEC teams qualified for a bowl. Correct me if I'm wrong. In order for all to go there might have to be an SEC rematch, so this is not as farfetched as it seems, although I'm sure they would rather match two teams that have not played.
In addition to the ones mentioned above Oklahoma/Nebraska had a rematch in the Orange Bowl several years ago.
-
Originally Posted by
starkvegasdawg
Article in the CL about the small possibility of the Peach bowl being an EB rematch. Would you be in favor?
I would LOVE to see that happen. If our team couldn't come out fired up for that then they should all just put in for extras on The Walking Dead.
**** that noise. 1) I would rather prove ourselves against an OSU, "GTU", or Wisconsin. 2) We were playing a wounded Bear team and a one-legged Bo Dirt for a playoff spot. Judging by the performance, the coaches and players could have cared less. Let them live with it for the next 51 weeks like we have to.
-
Originally Posted by
Barkman Turner Overdrive
**** that noise. 1) I would rather prove ourselves against an OSU, "GTU", or Wisconsin. 2) We were playing a wounded Bear team and a one-legged Bo Dirt for a playoff spot. Judging by the performance, the coaches and players could have cared less. Let them live with it for the next 51 weeks like we have to.
paradoxical.
"It is not courage to resist TUSK; It is courage to accept TUSK."
No.
Easy there buddy. Tusk is...well Tusk is Tusk. Tireddawg 12.20.17
-
Originally Posted by
TUSK
paradoxical.
How so? In section 1, my point was I would rather play someone out of conference. In section 2, my point was we blew a great chance to win one on the road and we need to make winning the game a bigger priority. Bottom line, we failed. Let's move on and prove out mettle against a B1G opponent.
-
Originally Posted by
Barkman Turner Overdrive
How so? In section 1, my point was I would rather play someone out of conference. In section 2, my point was we blew a great chance to win one on the road and we need to make winning the game a bigger priority. Bottom line, we failed. Let's move on and prove out mettle against a B1G opponent.
yeah, what threw me off is that in (1) you said "prove yourself" but in (2) talked about coming up short vs Om...
don't get me wrong, the risk/reward is out of balance for MSU to really want that game; but it'd be the best chance to "prove" oneself...IMO....
that's all.
"It is not courage to resist TUSK; It is courage to accept TUSK."
No.
Easy there buddy. Tusk is...well Tusk is Tusk. Tireddawg 12.20.17
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.
Reply With Quote