Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 43

Thread: Prediction - State has two 100 yrd rushers at USM

  1. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    13,728
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by BuckyIsAB**** View Post
    I hope it?s closer to 70 30 Run pass with the pass game being quick game, RPO and shot plays off hard play action, max protect. We have a big OL 3 SEC backs and some speed at WR. I don?t see what else we should do
    Lebby has never ever been anywhere close to 70/30

  2. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Location
    Pittsburgh PA
    Posts
    2,458
    vCash
    3000
    Lebby has to know in the back of his head there is a strong chance Shapen gets hurt. I think 55/45 run/pass is what we see but if Shapen gets hurt I see more like 60/40 or closer to 65/35. Shapen has good arm strength and the potential to be a good QB for us if he can maintain from getting injured. OL is the main concern I have offensively.

  3. #23
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    10,498
    vCash
    1003100
    Quote Originally Posted by DEDawg View Post
    That is way too high imo. Maybe if it is the LK or KT package but you are leaving a lot on the table with a 5th year QB doing that
    And throw it to who? We dont have one proven WR on the roster honestly

  4. #24
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    10,498
    vCash
    1003100
    Quote Originally Posted by Homedawg View Post
    Lebby has never ever been anywhere close to 70/30
    Better lean that way this time. You have 2 TE, 3 proven SEC backs, one of the biggest and most improved OLs in the conference, an injury prone QB and no proven WRs. You run the ball, you max protect and take shots out of 12 personnel. That is hell on a defense. You are getting 2 1v1s for what is a fast WR group and you do have an athletic TE in Traore. When you do throw it it is quick game get it out fast. Bubbles, hitch, etc

  5. #25
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2023
    Posts
    1,139
    vCash
    1000
    Quote Originally Posted by BuckyIsAB**** View Post
    Better lean that way this time. You have 2 TE, 3 proven SEC backs, one of the biggest and most improved OLs in the conference, an injury prone QB and no proven WRs. You run the ball, you max protect and take shots out of 12 personnel. That is hell on a defense. You are getting 2 1v1s for what is a fast WR group and you do have an athletic TE in Traore. When you do throw it it is quick game get it out fast. Bubbles, hitch, etc
    I don’t actually hate this idea. I think this game plan could help you steal a win or two by shortening games if the defense can hold at all.

  6. #26
    Senior Member Todd4State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    43,548
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by BuckyIsAB**** View Post
    And throw it to who? We dont have one proven WR on the roster honestly
    I'm not sure that we had one really last year either. This offense by scheme allows WR's to thrive even if they aren't the most proven. I think we are as good or better at WR than we were at this time last year. Mosley, Brennen Thompson, Anthony Evans, Ayden Williams, and SanFrisco Magee are all really talented and have various levels of WR experience in the SEC. Then you have Ricky Johnson.

  7. #27
    Senior Member Todd4State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    43,548
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by PGHBulldogBG View Post
    Lebby has to know in the back of his head there is a strong chance Shapen gets hurt. I think 55/45 run/pass is what we see but if Shapen gets hurt I see more like 60/40 or closer to 65/35. Shapen has good arm strength and the potential to be a good QB for us if he can maintain from getting injured. OL is the main concern I have offensively.
    I think we should just play call like normal and if Shapen gets hurt he gets hurt. That's why we got Kromenhoek. It seems like whenever we play to call to keep a QB from getting hurt it always backfires because we end up being overly conservative.

  8. #28
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    3,052
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Todd4State View Post
    I'm not sure that we had one really last year either. This offense by scheme allows WR's to thrive even if they aren't the most proven. I think we are as good or better at WR than we were at this time last year. Mosley, Brennen Thompson, Anthony Evans, Ayden Williams, and SanFrisco Magee are all really talented and have various levels of WR experience in the SEC. Then you have Ricky Johnson.
    Correct. Kevin Coleman had done pretty much nothing before last season.

  9. #29
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Posts
    1,519
    vCash
    3000
    Quote Originally Posted by BuckyIsAB**** View Post
    And throw it to who? We dont have one proven WR on the roster honestly
    That doesnt mean we only should throw the ball 30%? WR will emerge throughout the season

  10. #30
    Senior Member StarkVegasSteve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    11,625
    vCash
    86166
    Quote Originally Posted by BuckyIsAB**** View Post
    And throw it to who? We dont have one proven WR on the roster honestly
    We didn't last year either and were just fine. This offense is going to produce 65/850/8. It's done it everywhere. From UCF to Ole Miss to Oklahoma and here last year.

  11. #31
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    2,945
    vCash
    4835
    Quote Originally Posted by Brobi-wan View Post
    I don’t actually hate this idea. I think this game plan could help you steal a win or two by shortening games if the defense can hold at all.
    Bingo. This is the only way I see us getting to 6 wins.

  12. #32
    Senior Member TrapGame's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    13,722
    vCash
    4975
    Quote Originally Posted by Brobi-wan View Post
    I don’t actually hate this idea. I think this game plan could help you steal a win or two by shortening games if the defense can hold at all.
    Isn't that kind of like what South Carolina was doing last year?

  13. #33
    Senior Member Todd4State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    43,548
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by TrapGame View Post
    Isn't that kind of like what South Carolina was doing last year?
    Not that extreme. They were 60/40 run pass using traditional data. So including scrambles and sacks they were probably more like 50/50 or close to it.

    I couldn't find advanced data for them so I went with traditional.

  14. #34
    Senior Member Coach34's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    33,748
    vCash
    17200
    #RTGDF and take shots down the field
    Last edited by Coach34; 08-26-2025 at 08:08 PM.
    Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is

  15. #35
    Senior Member bulldawg28's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    5,837
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach34 View Post
    #RTGDF and take shots down the field
    This ALL DAY! The one thing this new agenda football has done is taken the physical component away and turned things into a pass league. These Defenses have resorted to smaller faster guys.

    Being a physical team will and running the ball will win games in today's climate. We could use Arizona state as a model from last year. Teams that run the ball win championships in high school, college, and pro. All the current champions have one thing in common, they are run heavy!

  16. #36
    Senior Member TrapGame's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    13,722
    vCash
    4975
    I do not think USM will be good enough on defense to stop our ground game and Lebby is going to exploit that.

    Borky and Haddad were talking yesterday about hearing things from people at practice and scrimmages that see big improvements on both sides of the ball. They (the folks they spoke with) are quietly optimistic that we are going to be a lot better than most people think.

  17. #37
    Senior Member StarkVegasSteve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    11,625
    vCash
    86166
    Quote Originally Posted by TrapGame View Post
    I do not think USM will be good enough on defense to stop our ground game and Lebby is going to exploit that.

    Borky and Haddad were talking yesterday about hearing things from people at practice and scrimmages that see big improvements on both sides of the ball. They (the folks they spoke with) are quietly optimistic that we are going to be a lot better than most people think.
    Talked to a couple of people this week that said we'll be 58:42 or even 59:41 rush/pass ratio. Said that doesn't mean we're not going to throw but it's going to be very similar to the 2021 Ole Miss offense. Said they expect Booth and Bothwell to both have at or near 200 carries. Also said that Davis/Gayten/Daniels will also probably get 100 carries between the 3.

  18. #38
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Posts
    1,519
    vCash
    3000
    Quote Originally Posted by StarkVegasSteve View Post
    Talked to a couple of people this week that said we'll be 58:42 or even 59:41 rush/pass ratio. Said that doesn't mean we're not going to throw but it's going to be very similar to the 2021 Ole Miss offense. Said they expect Booth and Bothwell to both have at or near 200 carries. Also said that Davis/Gayten/Daniels will also probably get 100 carries between the 3.
    Yeah this is great. Shapen throws a great deep ball and we have elite speed on the outside. Dominate on the ground and take shots downfield when they present. Play SEC defense and claw our way to 6 wins.

  19. #39
    Senior Member Todd4State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    43,548
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by StarkVegasSteve View Post
    Talked to a couple of people this week that said we'll be 58:42 or even 59:41 rush/pass ratio. Said that doesn't mean we're not going to throw but it's going to be very similar to the 2021 Ole Miss offense. Said they expect Booth and Bothwell to both have at or near 200 carries. Also said that Davis/Gayten/Daniels will also probably get 100 carries between the 3.
    I bet Shapen doesn't run it 152 times this year though. Corral was a big part of their run game and I know we're talking strictly about ratios here but if you reduce the QB runs it's likely to make the ratios smaller. I'm talking 55/45 here for reference run/pass.

    Also, I wouldn't be surprised that as receivers emerge we evolve to Lebby's norm as the season progresses.

  20. #40
    Senior Member Todd4State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    43,548
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by StarkVegasSteve View Post
    Talked to a couple of people this week that said we'll be 58:42 or even 59:41 rush/pass ratio. Said that doesn't mean we're not going to throw but it's going to be very similar to the 2021 Ole Miss offense. Said they expect Booth and Bothwell to both have at or near 200 carries. Also said that Davis/Gayten/Daniels will also probably get 100 carries between the 3.
    Off topic- didn't MSU hire some football analytics guys in the offseason or did I make that up?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.