-
SEC Teams Returning Starters
Per CBS article (I know returning starters could be a good or bad thing).
Aggie. 15 (7 offense)
Alabama. 14 (6 offense)
Fla. 13 (6 offense)
Mizzou. 13 (5 offense)
Vandy. 13 (5 offense)
Ok. 12 (6 offense)
State. 11 (6 offense)
Auburn. 11 (6 offense)
TN. 10 (3 offense)
USCe. 9 (5 offense)
Texas. 9 (3 offense)
Ark. 8 (4 offense)
UGA. 7 (4 offense)
Ky. 7 (3 offense)
LSU. 7 (4 offense)
Mississippi. 5 (3 offense)
https://www.cbssports.com/college-fo...wer-four-team/
-
Fascinating how bad a year Ok State, UCF, West Va. and Purdue all had and yet they return the fewest starters! Maybe that's the old " the good news is Nobody is back"!!
-

Originally Posted by
confucius say
Per CBS article (I know returning starters could be a good or bad thing).
Aggie. 15 (7 offense)
Alabama. 14 (6 offense)
Fla. 13 (6 offense)
Mizzou. 13 (5 offense)
Vandy. 13 (5 offense)
Ok. 12 (6 offense)
State. 11 (6 offense)
Auburn. 11 (6 offense)
TN. 10 (3 offense)
USCe. 9 (5 offense)
Texas. 9 (3 offense)
Ark. 8 (4 offense)
UGA. 7 (4 offense)
Ky. 7 (3 offense)
LSU. 7 (4 offense)
Mississippi. 5 (3 offense)
https://www.cbssports.com/college-fo...wer-four-team/
How many lost to grad and how many to Portal??
-
Returning starters typically is an indicator of success.
-

Originally Posted by
Todd4State
Returning starters typically is an indicator of success.
Typically yes. but they still need to be SEC level talent, Not G5.
-

Originally Posted by
parabrave
Typically yes. but they still need to be SEC level talent, Not G5.
Well yeah. But in the portal era most teams are able to trim any deadweight.
-

Originally Posted by
Todd4State
Returning starters typically is an indicator of success.
And this is why I expect A&M to jump to 9 wins this year and Mississippi to take a step back in spite of their weak schedule
Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is
-

Originally Posted by
Coach34
And this is why I expect A&M to jump to 9 wins this year and Mississippi to take a step back in spite of their weak schedule
Personally I think they are going to miss Dart a lot. We'll see.
-
Returning starters is always good for team dynamics but with the portal now it doesn?t mean what it once did
-

Originally Posted by
Coach34
And this is why I expect A&M to jump to 9 wins this year and Mississippi to take a step back in spite of their weak schedule
Part of same reason I'm higher on Fla and Ok than most.
-

Originally Posted by
Todd4State
Personally I think they are going to miss Dart a lot. We'll see.
I don’t think they will miss Dart at all. They gonna miss the OL vets and defensive players I believe.
Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is
-

Originally Posted by
confucius say
Part of same reason I'm higher on Fla and Ok than most.
I think Fla is going to be very good- but they could be very good and still be 8-4. Their schedule is insane. If I’m Foley- Sunbelt Billy gets 1 freebie loss just because the schedule is ridiculous. I keep him at 8-4. If he does 7-5- they gonna fire him. Fla fans have unrealistic expectations just like LSU does
Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is
-

Originally Posted by
Coach34
I think Fla is going to be very good- but they could be very good and still be 8-4. Their schedule is insane. If I’m Foley- Sunbelt Billy gets 1 freebie loss just because the schedule is ridiculous. I keep him at 8-4. If he does 7-5- they gonna fire him. Fla fans have unrealistic expectations just like LSU does
Agree. I just think they are going to be really good. Top 3 in sec good.
-

Originally Posted by
Coach34
I don’t think they will miss Dart at all. They gonna miss the OL vets and defensive players I believe.
You're talking about a first round QB that they just lost. Now, Simmons may eventually be one some day but it's hard to have that back to back even for someone like Alabama. Add in the other losses at key position groups plus really high expectations and it's going to be hard to deal with.
-

Originally Posted by
PGHBulldogBG
Returning starters is always good for team dynamics but with the portal now it doesn?t mean what it once did
I think teams are going to shift to a pro mentality. You build a core. For example MSU can build around Kamario Taylor, JJ Hill, Lockhart, etc. Then you bring in "free agents" to build around them.
And I don't know that there is a specific number or percentage of how much has to be from recruiting vs how many from the portal but teams definitely need something to build around. I guess in a perfect world you would have about 10-15 guys that are your core from 2-3 classes and then another 10-15 from the portal or something like that. So, I think player development still has a place in the game but teams definitely have to at least be active in the portal.
-

Originally Posted by
Todd4State
You're talking about a first round QB that they just lost. Now, Simmons may eventually be one some day but it's hard to have that back to back even for someone like Alabama. Add in the other losses at key position groups plus really high expectations and it's going to be hard to deal with.
I base it off the fact the word was the wasn’t much difference between him and Dart last year. Basically, Simmons has a higher ceiling than Dart
Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is
-

Originally Posted by
Coach34
I base it off the fact the word was the wasn?t much difference between him and Dart last year. Basically, Simmons has a higher ceiling than Dart
Game reps matter even with more talent. Simmons might be real good by end of year, we'll see. Do agree that OL is what will make him look pedestrian at times probably. Game is won and lost in the trenches which is also why I think OM steps back this year to mediocre.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.