Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Future 2026 schedule and a 9 SEC slate

  1. #1
    Senior Member Lord McBuckethead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    13,619
    vCash
    3086

    Future 2026 schedule and a 9 SEC slate

    I am for it. I also would like to see one of the other ones have to be a BIG10 matchup home and away rotating. Set weekend time to do it every year.

    For instance, all teams play week 3 against the BIG10.
    Downvotes_Hype

  2. #2
    Senior Member Todd4State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    43,333
    vCash
    3700
    I think that is what is inevitably going to happen.

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2025
    Posts
    60
    vCash
    1000
    Mississippi State, Arkansas and Vandy will get an annual rotation of Ohio State, Michigan, Oregon while Alabama, Georgia, and Texas will enjoy their annual matchups with Northwestern, Purdue, and Rutgers

  4. #4
    Senior Member DownwardDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Pocahontas, Mississippi
    Posts
    11,600
    vCash
    1540588
    If we play 9 SEC games, the other 3 games should be Umass, Jacksonville State, and Tulane.

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2025
    Posts
    60
    vCash
    1000
    Quote Originally Posted by DownwardDawg View Post
    If we play 9 SEC games, the other 3 games should be Umass, Jacksonville State, and Tulane.
    I think the "free" FCS win games should be done away with. And if you are going to go with a 9 game league schedule and a mandantory BiG/SEC game, then the 6 win bowl mandate should be dropped. We are barely fielding enough bowl eligible teams anyway so who cares if a 5-7 SEC or Big Ten team plays in the Tiddlywink Bowl.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Memphis
    Posts
    1,212
    vCash
    2741
    Quote Originally Posted by BravesDoggy View Post
    I think the "free" FCS win games should be done away with. And if you are going to go with a 9 game league schedule and a mandantory BiG/SEC game, then the 6 win bowl mandate should be dropped. We are barely fielding enough bowl eligible teams anyway so who cares if a 5-7 SEC or Big Ten team plays in the Tiddlywink Bowl.
    This. I'd rather watch us play 12 P4 opponents that are fun match ups than us beat a team like MTSU 3 or 4 times a year.

  7. #7
    General Public Political Hack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    General Public
    Posts
    17,388
    vCash
    7178
    I like the "only one FCS team per year" rule towards bowl eligibility. They should do the same with non-P4 schools. You only get 1 per year. That would give teams 1-2 "warm up" games per year to get film and work out kinks before hitting the conference schedule. With the addition of playoff games and conference championship games, having 1-2 lighter weeks throughout the season (e.g., game 1 and Homecoming) gives the players bodies a little time to heal if needed.

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2025
    Posts
    60
    vCash
    1000
    I just think the FCS is so bad now at the bottom end. Now that teams like Liberty, Jacksonville State, Kennesaw, Sam Houston, etc have all moved to D1, you have a small tier of good teams and then total trash. Programs would be stupid to schedule a Montana or North Dakota State and we get absolutely nothing out of demolishing a SWAC team or East TN State. Nobody goes to the game and if you did away with the 6 win requirement that free FCS win is meaningless anyway. There are still enough teams at the bottom of the FBS that you could easily guarantee a win or 2.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.