Quote Originally Posted by SPMT View Post
Yeah.

On a different note, though I like Leach a lot, I do now believe him being here hurt program development in the short term. Due only to the way he chose players for his style of offense and lack of defensive care.

At first I thought people were overreacting, but it appears to be significant.

Add the absolute garbage staff we had last year and this and probably next year will not be good.
I think what hurt more was MSU making extremely poor decisions after Leach passed away. As in hiring Arnett and going in a completely different direction with the offense. It was the same mistake MSU made with hiring Moorhead after Dan. We should have hired a power spread option guy to either be the head coach or OC after Dan left. And yet I don't see anyone complaining about the players that Dan left Joe on offense even though some of them were lacking especially at the WR spot. Leach passed away two years ago and with the portal we should have been able to rebuild by now. See Vanderbilt. If they can rebuild in one offseason there is zero reason why MSU can't do it too.

This is who should be our QB right now.

https://www.espn.com/college-footbal...wyer-robertson

Those are the kind of players we ran off. And by the way it was a Mike Leach recruit that just won the Kent Hull award a couple of days ago.

He did give Arnett autonomy to recruit the defensive side of the ball and I will say that was a mistake on his part.