Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 27

Thread: Kevin Coleman, WR transfer from Louisville is a Dawg

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    3,658
    vCash
    3200

    Kevin Coleman, WR transfer from Louisville is a Dawg

    Outstanding offer list out of high school.
    https://247sports.com/Recruitment/ke...ruitInterests/

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    1,659
    vCash
    3200
    Also had Jaylin Lucas on campus today and just recently offered a transfer from Oregon State. Hearing we have Blanton and may not be pursuing Dodwell as hard now-working on trying to get Hunter if Judkins goes to Auburn.

    Really need to land the two South AL DBs and the Liberty CB.

  3. #3
    Senior Member bulldawg28's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    5,826
    vCash
    3700
    Lebby doing work

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Posts
    412
    vCash
    3000
    Eligibility question: after transferring twice in two years and not being a graduate, how is he immediately eligible?

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    4,244
    vCash
    203638
    Quote Originally Posted by bigbub50 View Post
    Eligibility question: after transferring twice in two years and not being a graduate, how is he immediately eligible?
    Rule change

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Posts
    412
    vCash
    3000
    Quote Originally Posted by mparkerfd20 View Post
    Rule change
    What is the rule now? Unlimited transfers?

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    4,069
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by bigbub50 View Post
    What is the rule now? Unlimited transfers?
    If playing in a game and your opponent offers you more NIL money during the second quarter, you must remain with your school until halftime. At halftime you change jerseys, change locker rooms, and play the second half for your opponent (I am only half joking it seems).

  8. #8
    Senior Member Coursesuper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    5,323
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by bigbub50 View Post
    What is the rule now? Unlimited transfers?
    Yes, at present there is an injunction in place from a federal judge that is allowing the unlimited transfers. Litigation was brought challenging the ncaa’s rules this past summer. Bart and Charlie talked that length in a podcast. There are several different suits that will be changing the landscape even further in the near future. It’s not a pretty picture.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    4,984
    vCash
    3200
    Love it, but what the hell we gonna do with all these wideouts lol

  10. #10
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2021
    Posts
    3,095
    vCash
    3000
    word

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Covington, Louisiana
    Posts
    2,571
    vCash
    700722589
    Dawgs roster starting to look like Oklahoma "light", mostly offence and not much defense !!

  12. #12
    Senior Member KB21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    3,350
    vCash
    3200
    Quote Originally Posted by Offshore Dawg View Post
    Dawgs roster starting to look like Oklahoma "light", mostly offence and not much defense !!
    Doesn't bother me much. Offense is what wins in the modern game anyway.

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    3,037
    vCash
    3100
    We also have some young pieces on defense. We certainly need more help, but we have some young talent.

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    3,658
    vCash
    3200
    Quote Originally Posted by KB21 View Post
    Doesn't bother me much. Offense is what wins in the modern game anyway.
    ^^^This^^^ We gave up 30pts/game in the SEC even including KJ's hungover 3 pts. The conference Champs gave up 20/game in the SEC last year. Gone are the days of winning 17-14 every week. Plus, building your offense first just makes more sense.

  15. #15
    Senior Member Interpolation_Dawg_EX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    4,415
    vCash
    62623
    Quote Originally Posted by Coursesuper View Post
    Yes, at present there is an injunction in place from a federal judge that is allowing the unlimited transfers. Litigation was brought challenging the ncaa’s rules this past summer. Bart and Charlie talked that length in a podcast. There are several different suits that will be changing the landscape even further in the near future. It’s not a pretty picture.
    What if another judge reverses the injunction? Are we going to have a bunch of ineligible players?

  16. #16
    Senior Member bulldawg28's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    5,826
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by Interpolation_Dawg_EX View Post
    What if another judge reverses the injunction? Are we going to have a bunch of ineligible players?
    I think this WR is the only double transfer utilizing this rule.

  17. #17
    Senior Member gtowndawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Memphis area
    Posts
    2,560
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by KB21 View Post
    Doesn't bother me much. Offense is what wins in the modern game anyway.
    Washington has the 119th pass ranked defense in the country (and I think the 94th overall defense) and they are playing for the natty. Defense is important but it's starting to lean towards "optional"

  18. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Posts
    1,150
    vCash
    3100
    Some folks can?t help themselves. They are so hell bent that you gotta RTGDFB and play top defense to win in todays game.

    Washington, Ole Miss, and LSU all prove you can win at a high level with elite offense and so-so defense.

    Should we abandon the run and play bad defense? No. But we are going to have an elite offense next year.

  19. #19
    Senior Member Gutter Cobreh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    1,974
    vCash
    2000000000
    Quote Originally Posted by CoachT14 View Post
    Some folks can?t help themselves. They are so hell bent that you gotta RTGDFB and play top defense to win in todays game.

    Washington, Ole Miss, and LSU all prove you can win at a high level with elite offense and so-so defense.

    Should we abandon the run and play bad defense? No. But we are going to have an elite offense next year.
    Defense still wins championships - which will become apparent on Monday when Michigan rolls over Washington.

    Having said that, we aren't winning a championship so the next best thing is to produce a fun, exciting product. That gets accomplished by having a competent offense to watch that moves the ball. I'm 100% behind this staff and what they've been doing and am hopeful as we put points on the board next year - it continues to drive fan engagement and excitement.

  20. #20
    Senior Member Todd4State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    43,471
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by Gutter Cobreh View Post
    Defense still wins championships - which will become apparent on Monday when Michigan rolls over Washington.

    Having said that, we aren't winning a championship so the next best thing is to produce a fun, exciting product. That gets accomplished by having a competent offense to watch that moves the ball. I'm 100% behind this staff and what they've been doing and am hopeful as we put points on the board next year - it continues to drive fan engagement and excitement.
    I think the root of our issues has been our recruiting across multiple coaching regimes.

    If Lebby lives up to his billing on offense and we can combine that with our traditional defensive model we could have a lot of fun in the coming years.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.