-
Originally Posted by
Homedawg
So he should do ok then. Great.
I’m not saying he is bad but realistically he is going to be 6-6 to 8-4 year in and year out, I don’t think he would ever give us a chance at 10 wins with his style. We could definitely do a lot worse.
-
Originally Posted by
Charlie_Sheen420
I?m not saying he is bad but realistically he is going to be 6-6 to 8-4 year in and year out, I don?t think he would ever give us a chance at 10 wins with his style. We could definitely do a lot worse.
Maybe not. But considering the list of coaches that got us to 10 is rather short.....first be consistent in getting 7 to 8 wins. Then hope he can get a special year every 5 or so. Remember we've had one top 12 finish since 1941. One.
Eta special means have a shot to win 10. Won't always get the 10 but a chance
-
The guy has talent deficits compared to others in his conference and yet wins consistently and is always competitive. That's coaching.
He's not my first choice but we could do way worse than
Campbell
-
Originally Posted by
Commercecomet24
The guy has talent deficits compared to others in his conference and yet wins consistently and is always competitive. That's coaching.
He's not my first choice but we could do way worse than
Campbell
That's a fair way of putting it.
-
I mean is he even a realistic candidate?
-
Originally Posted by
chef dixon
I mean is he even a realistic candidate?
Not until Starkville gets a Target**
-
Originally Posted by
Charlie_Sheen420
We both have overall losing records, we both have 1 division title, they have 2 conference titles to our 1, each state has two major P5 schools to split a smaller population, similar size stadiums….we are a lot more similar than you think
They have nearly the same win as Vandy in their history. We have nearly 150 more wins and we are over .500 In our history. It's not the same.
-
TX 23-16 ISU in the 4th, playing hard.
-
Originally Posted by
Really Clark?
They have nearly the same win as Vandy in their history. We have nearly 150 more wins and we are over .500 In our history. It's not the same.
Per the NCAA record books we are not over .500, I know we are if we disregard the penalties/forfeits but the official record is we are under, and we are not that much higher than Vandy all time
-
Originally Posted by
chef dixon
I mean is he even a realistic candidate?
Well that part idk. Maybe not. But I'd dang sure take him.
-
Hed be about as good of a hire you can make. Home run
-
Anyone who would not be happy with Campbell is living in an alternate reality of disillusion. We are Alabama. Or lsu. Or Florida. And in this day of nil we are not even sniffing those schools. Accept it
-
Originally Posted by
Charlie_Sheen420
Per the NCAA record books we are not over .500, I know we are if we disregard the penalties/forfeits but the official record is we are under, and we are not that much higher than Vandy all time
Ok, after forfeits we have won 585 games. Vandy has won 557 games. ISU has won 545 games. They are much closer and below Vandy
-
Originally Posted by
Commercecomet24
The guy has talent deficits compared to others in his conference and yet wins consistently and is always competitive. That's coaching.
He's not my first choice but we could do way worse than
Campbell
This!
-
Originally Posted by
Really Clark?
I don't understand it. How can you look at ISU history, program profile and NIL and think he is average. He is first coach since Earle Bruce in the mid 70's to even have a career winning record at ISU. For those who don't know, Ohio St pulled Bruce from ISU.
It's not a big deal. Some people think the earth is flat. Any halfway knowledgeable fan would be thrilled with Campbell.
-
I mean we could do worse. No doubt.
But he's down the list for me. Behind leipold, fisch, Chadwell, smith, Mullen (I know), etc....
Plus i doubt he wants to come here.
-
Originally Posted by
confucius say
I mean we could do worse. No doubt.
But he's down the list for me. Behind leipold, fisch, Chadwell, smith, Mullen (I know), etc....
Plus i doubt he wants to come here.
I get the doubt he wants to come here but your list is made up of guys that you can say the same about.
-
Originally Posted by
confucius say
I mean we could do worse. No doubt.
But he's down the list for me. Behind leipold, fisch, Chadwell, smith, Mullen (I know), etc....
Plus i doubt he wants to come here.
lol, imagine preferring Smith and Fisch over Campbell.
-
Originally Posted by
HoopsDawg
lol, imagine preferring Smith and Fisch over Campbell.
Everybody would. Everybody with any sense at least. Campbell is vegetable lasagna.
He's a 6-6 coach at ISU and is 10-13 in his last 23 despite being the number 7 recruiter in a 14 team conference.
-
Originally Posted by
confucius say
Everybody would. Everybody with any sense at least. Campbell is vegetable lasagna.
He's a 6-6 coach at ISU and is 10-13 in his last 23 despite being the number 7 recruiter in a 14 team conference.
Arnett-Barbay-Brock beat Fisch
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.
Reply With Quote