-

Originally Posted by
RockyDog
The point was in no way to compare anything to WKU. It was directed at the knuckleheads that are toting the Errr Raid water who were trying to make Hollingshead into a hero that would have helped lead MSU to 10 wins if only we had stuck with the system.
And now, they've tried to say that anybody against the Err Raid is a Barbay/Arnett apologist. Couldn't be further from the truth. They all suck. And I think most level headed people can see that we weren't going to win big even if we had stood pat. We would have lost Leach's playcalling regardless, we did nothing to improve the QB, RB, or WR positions from last year. If nothing else it would have been more of the same with a decidedly worse defense.
Could we have won 9 this year? Maybe, IF Leach was still the HC. But even if we had kept the same system, it would still have been a bunch of new coaches knocking their heads together and making a bunch of rookie mistakes.
Yeah, did nothing last year in recruiting... Parson, Creed, Justin Brown(transferred once the system changed in spring ball), Seth Davis.....those guys will probably all suck ***
Alos lost all the other backup QBs with the system change. Locke may have left anyway, but we did not help ourselves in changing the system.
-

Originally Posted by
Santiago
Yeah, did nothing last year in recruiting... Parson, Creed, Justin Brown(transferred once the system changed in spring ball), Seth Davis.....those guys will probably all suck ***
Alos lost all the other backup QBs with the system change. Locke may have left anyway, but we did not help ourselves in changing the system.
Parson was not playing no matter who the coach is. Creed would have touched the ball less in Leach?s system because he doesn?t play RB.
I didn?t say one thing about any of them sucking, douchebag. I said we didn?t add anybody that was going to play over the returners we had coming back. Therefore, the Leach offense would have been mostly identical to last year. Same Will. Same Woody. Same underutilized WR group.
And don?t kid yourself thinking that the wonder freshmen were going to stay regardless and sit another season behind Rogers. The QB room was going to be the same as it is now except with a different guy besides Wright as the backup.
Last edited by RockyDog; 10-25-2023 at 03:28 PM.
-

Originally Posted by
Commercecomet24
I think a lot on here call them "garbage time" points so they don't count, lol!
Exactly!
-

Originally Posted by
Coach34
Did you take out the 6 extra TD's we had on defense and ST's last year? Ya know, since we have exclude some things as BlackSails does
Is there an equation for playing Georgia last year also? This year we got South Carolina, who has a very pourous defense
-

Originally Posted by
RockyDog
Parson was not playing no matter who the coach is. Creed would have touched the ball less in Leach?s system because he doesn?t play RB.
I didn?t say one thing about any of them sucking, douchebag. I said we didn?t add anybody that was going to play over the returners we had coming back. Therefore, the Leach offense would have been mostly identical to last year. Same Will. Same Woody. Same underutilized WR group.
And don?t kid yourself thinking that the wonder freshmen were going to stay regardless and sit another season behind Rogers. The QB room was going to be the same as it is now except with a different guy besides Wright as the backup.
Locke will be a 4 year starter at Wisconsin. We lost a talented QB. Creed would have played this year under Leach's system. Parson stayed with MSU and encouraged all other players to be the legacy of Coach Leach's last signing class. This may not be seen this year, but is a big impact next season and the next.
Last edited by Santiago; 10-25-2023 at 07:23 PM.
-
This post didn?t age well.
-

Originally Posted by
preachermatt83
This post didn?t age well.
Did they win? Please tell me they won just for the entertainment purposes of this thread.
-

Originally Posted by
DownwardDawg
Did they win? Please tell me they won just for the entertainment purposes of this thread.
They lost 42-29
-

Originally Posted by
DownwardDawg
Did they win? Please tell me they won just for the entertainment purposes of this thread.
No. But clearly had very little to do with offensive output.
-

Originally Posted by
preachermatt83
No. But clearly had very little to do with offensive output.
It was 28-10 to start the 4th quarter. 35-16 mid 4th quarter.
-

Originally Posted by
RockyDog
Parson was not playing no matter who the coach is. Creed would have touched the ball less in Leach?s system because he doesn?t play RB.
I didn?t say one thing about any of them sucking, douchebag. I said we didn?t add anybody that was going to play over the returners we had coming back. Therefore, the Leach offense would have been mostly identical to last year. Same Will. Same Woody. Same underutilized WR group.
And don?t kid yourself thinking that the wonder freshmen were going to stay regardless and sit another season behind Rogers. The QB room was going to be the same as it is now except with a different guy besides Wright as the backup.
We would have been much better at WR this year than last- add in a much more favorable schedule and I think our offense averages around 36 PPG on the season. Zavion, Robinson, and Creed would have been better utilized and would have made a huge difference. And no way Leach runs Woody 20+ times against people like SELU. I think Tulu would have broke out this year as well.
-

Originally Posted by
Santiago
Yeah, did nothing last year in recruiting... Parson, Creed, Justin Brown(transferred once the system changed in spring ball), Seth Davis.....those guys will probably all suck ***
Alos lost all the other backup QBs with the system change. Locke may have left anyway, but we did not help ourselves in changing the system.
While I think a few of them may turn out good, none of them has done anything yet. Notice what is missing? Where are the star LOS guys? I hope we have a few on D, not sure yet.
-

Originally Posted by
RockyDog
Parson was not playing no matter who the coach is. Creed would have touched the ball less in Leach?s system because he doesn?t play RB.
I didn?t say one thing about any of them sucking, douchebag. I said we didn?t add anybody that was going to play over the returners we had coming back. Therefore, the Leach offense would have been mostly identical to last year. Same Will. Same Woody. Same underutilized WR group.
And don?t kid yourself thinking that the wonder freshmen were going to stay regardless and sit another season behind Rogers. The QB room was going to be the same as it is now except with a different guy besides Wright as the backup.
Add to that we know Leach didn't play backups either to prepare for future or whatever so no impact this year.
-

Originally Posted by
preachermatt83
This post didn?t age well.
aged very well. WK getting getting garbage points when they were clearly beat doesnt change that
Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is
-

Originally Posted by
Coach34
aged very well. WK getting getting garbage points when they were clearly beat doesnt change that
We were told just weeks ago scoring 30 on usc and WR having his best career day was meaningless bc we lost.
-

Originally Posted by
Homedawg
We were told just weeks ago scoring 30 on usc and WR having his best career day was meaningless bc we lost.
hahahaha- yep
Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is
-

Originally Posted by
Homedawg
We were told just weeks ago scoring 30 on usc and WR having his best career day was meaningless bc we lost.
Yep, people using the same tired, old narratives.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.