-
How much does Barbay moving to the booth change things?
Was he finally able to see the WRs running open downfield that we all saw the first couple weeks? It probably helped, but, I think it was also a very bad SC secondary.
Everyone wants to be a beast...until its time to do what beasts do.
-
I don't think it's a coincidence the offense looked a lot better with him in the booth. I think he was able to communicate with offensive coaches better.
-
It tells me he doesn?t trust anyone on the staff to relay what the d is doing in game to him.
-
And it's a lot less hectic than the sidelines. I think it's easier for him to sequence plays when he's just sitting there with a play sheet. Yeah, you give up some personal interaction with the players, but big picture wise, I think the extra situational awareness is worth it.
Everyone wants to be a beast...until its time to do what beasts do.
-
I think the biggest factor was South Carolina's defense being one of the worst in the SEC.
-

Originally Posted by
Todd4State
I think the biggest factor was South Carolina's defense being one of the worst in the SEC.
A lot of fans have trouble realizing two things can be true at the same time.
Everyone wants to be a beast...until its time to do what beasts do.
-

Originally Posted by
Leroy Jenkins
A lot of fans have trouble realizing two things can be true at the same time.
I think both contributed. I think he was on the field 1st couple of drives then went up into the booth. If that's the case, it certainly made a difference.
I always think an OC should be in the booth. The DC is different tho and I think they should be on the field..
-

Originally Posted by
dawgday166
I think both contributed. I think he was on the field 1st couple of drives then went up into the booth. If that's the case, it certainly made a difference.
I always think an OC should be in the booth. The DC is different tho and I think they should be on the field..
He was in the booth the whole game. I did notice Will on the headset with him for a long time after that second drive so it may have been that conversation that sparked something
-

Originally Posted by
dawgday166
I think both contributed. I think he was on the field 1st couple of drives then went up into the booth. If that's the case, it certainly made a difference.
I always think an OC should be in the booth. The DC is different tho and I think they should be on the field..
I think they should both be in the booth.
-

Originally Posted by
DownwardDawg
I think they should both be in the booth.
I think defense if more about passion and intensity and a passionate/intense DC on the field is a good thing IMO.
-

Originally Posted by
Leroy Jenkins
Was he finally able to see the WRs running open downfield that we all saw the first couple weeks? It probably helped, but, I think it was also a very bad SC secondary.
Not as much as him turning to what we do well. Those concepts looked really familiar.
-

Originally Posted by
Todd4State
I think the biggest factor was South Carolina's defense being one of the worst in the SEC.
That environment and it?s the same team that was up 14-3 on UGA. They arent bad. They are better than Auburn A&M and UK. Pretty similar to OM
-

Originally Posted by
BuckyIsAB****
That environment and it?s the same team that was up 14-3 on UGA. They arent bad. They are better than Auburn A&M and UK. Pretty similar to OM
I think they are better than Pissville U on both sides of the ball.
-

Originally Posted by
BuckyIsAB****
That environment and it?s the same team that was up 14-3 on UGA. They arent bad. They are better than Auburn A&M and UK. Pretty similar to OM
We'll see. The early returns- which can be very volatile and somewhat unreliable at this point in the season- say that they aren't very good.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.