-
Originally Posted by
Schultzy
Purdue -5 needs to beat Ohio St. 12:00 game
A&M -5 of course needs to beat Vandy 12:00 game
FAU +1.5. needs to beat UAB (night game)
Add needing Memphis and Houston winning today to eliminate a bid stealer chance from the American. 1 has to win and win the championship tomorrow.
-
We don't have a quad 4 loss and our 11-1 OOC start with some good wins really helps us. I don't understand close loses value. Could our SEC record come back to haunt us as there are only 3 good wins in the 9, which are arky, aTm, and MO?
-
Don’t be surprised if we’re a 10 seed as opposed to a play in team tomorrow.
-
Originally Posted by
Charlie_Sheen420
Vandy has to win it all to make it plain and simple. If they beat Bama to win it all I can?t argue they don?t deserve it over us, we had 3 shots to beat them and looked like ass two of those times
No, they don't........Even Seth Davis just said if they won today, they would likely be in..........
"The QB and the receiver weren't on the same page there, but hey its only week eleven". (Jack Cristil)
-
Originally Posted by
Ifyouonlyknew
Don’t be surprised if we’re a 10 seed as opposed to a play in team tomorrow.
That's kind of the boat I'm in. The bubble has been really bad this year and I've come around to thinking that we were probably in regardless vs Florida. That win just kept us out of the play in. Conference tourneys don't matter to the committee honestly. To give you an example of how bad the bubble is, Vandy and their NET of around 75 still have a chance and are still being talked about as on the bubble.
-
Originally Posted by
Ifyouonlyknew
Don’t be surprised if we’re a 10 seed as opposed to a play in team tomorrow.
IYOK usually has good sources/
-
Originally Posted by
Ifyouonlyknew
Don’t be surprised if we’re a 10 seed as opposed to a play in team tomorrow.
That's what I've been trying to say. We have the wins. Our name works against us in things bracketology but I bank on the committee sticking to things they value. It's like in 2018 half our fans thought we were going to be 7 or so and we were a 5
-
Originally Posted by
StarkVegasSteve
That's kind of the boat I'm in. The bubble has been really bad this year and I've come around to thinking that we were probably in regardless vs Florida. That win just kept us out of the play in. Conference tourneys don't matter to the committee honestly. To give you an example of how bad the bubble is, Vandy and their NET of around 75 still have a chance and are still being talked about as on the bubble.
The way Vandy's been playing the past month or so they deserve to be in, but on their own, not to replace us. They beat UK twice, I think, in one week. Plus, Stackhouse is the best-dressed coach in the country.
Last edited by RocketDawg; 03-11-2023 at 01:50 PM.
-
Originally Posted by
parabrave
IYOK usually has good sources/
This, he usually doesn't talk just to be talking.
-
Appreciate ya service, Purdue
-
Originally Posted by
parabrave
IYOK usually has good sources/
Unfortunately, that's nothing more than just pure speculation.......NOBODY has a clue how this will unfold.......
"The QB and the receiver weren't on the same page there, but hey its only week eleven". (Jack Cristil)
-
We in. Vandy getting skull****ed.
-
Seeing some stuff that we could land as a 10 seed from different experts.
-
Originally Posted by
trob115
Seeing some stuff that we could land as a 10 seed from different experts.
Yep I believe that's where we end up
-
114 of 118 "experts" (probably an exaggeration for some of them) have us in the field, mostly as an 11, but some as a 10:
http://bracketmatrix.com/
-
-
Originally Posted by
chef dixon
FAU getting it done
It's been a good day for us
-
Originally Posted by
msstate7
It's been a good day for us
Yep, the only game the whole day I wish had gone the other way was Penn State winning. But they were almost definitely in the field regardless, so it doesn't really matter. Great day for our chances.
-
Senior Member
Originally Posted by
Quaoarsking
114 of 118 "experts" (probably an exaggeration for some of them) have us in the field, mostly as an 11, but some as a 10:
http://bracketmatrix.com/
200/211 had ATM last year. It's up to the committee if they want to screw MSU. Do the right thing.
Last edited by RLM38654; 03-11-2023 at 10:25 PM.
Reason: Adding to my point
-
Originally Posted by
RLM38654
200/211 had ATM last year. It's up to the committee if they want to screw MSU. Do the right thing.
Yeah, but there are 4-5 teams behind us who are currently projected in; last year there was only 1 behind A&M. And the teams currently sitting outside the projection aren?t as strong as the teams last year who were projected out and then made it.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.