-
As a 100 % conservative I vote for socialism in College Football
We absolutely have to level the playing field to make the game more competitive!
-
There's a reason the NFL gets higher ratings, even when it seems to obvious to most of us that college football is more compelling.
-
Wanna change it? Don't watch it.
-
Professional sports figured this out a long time ago. It's why attendance has declined every year for the last 10 years in cfb. Costs rising to attend games and only about 5-6 teams have a shot at winning it all. Rest of us just playing for bowl order.
-
Originally Posted by
CaptainObvious
We absolutely have to level the playing field to make the game more competitive!
Dude, you just got it,,,, The 2nd best team just won the thing, man...
"It is not courage to resist TUSK; It is courage to accept TUSK."
No.
Easy there buddy. Tusk is...well Tusk is Tusk. Tireddawg 12.20.17
-
Originally Posted by
TUSK
Dude, you just got it,,,, The 2nd best team just won the thing, man...
Are you saying that Ohio State should've won last week????
-
Originally Posted by
TUSK
Dude, you just got it,,,, The 2nd best team just won the thing, man...
Dude. If only that tornado had hit Bryant Denny and wiped it out and not hurt a single soul!
Maybe next Tornado will do the trick!
-
Originally Posted by
CaptainObvious
Dude. If only that tornado had hit Bryant Denny and wiped it out and not hurt a single soul!
Maybe next Tornado will do the trick!
This, people, is how you do it!!!
CO, I love it! Well executed!
"It is not courage to resist TUSK; It is courage to accept TUSK."
No.
Easy there buddy. Tusk is...well Tusk is Tusk. Tireddawg 12.20.17
-
Lower scholarships from 85 to 70.
This is an easy fix that'll make a huge difference
-
Originally Posted by
KOdawg1
Lower scholarships from 85 to 70.
This is an easy fix that'll make a huge difference
Makes too much sense
-
Is the issue the SEC just that much better than the rest of college football?
College football here is just another level than the other conferences.
-
Originally Posted by
HoopsDawg
Makes too much sense
The critics will argue that's 2000 (131 x 15) kids that don't get a scholarship that would have. Not saying I agree, but that's what that they will say.
I still think you let less transfer. If you sign a kid, it's a 4-year commitment. If he leaves, you lose that scholarship.
-
Originally Posted by
KOdawg1
Lower scholarships from 85 to 70.
This is an easy fix that'll make a huge difference
Will never happen. They’re not about to cut 2,000+ scholarships.
-
Originally Posted by
CaptainObvious
We absolutely have to level the playing field to make the game more competitive!
So you're saying we should dig up Che's hacked up body from Bolivia and appoint him head of the NCAA?****
-
Originally Posted by
BeardoMSU
So you're saying we should dig up Che's hacked up body from Bolivia and appoint him head of the NCAA?****
I hate you so much************
that was well executed, commie rad:;
"It is not courage to resist TUSK; It is courage to accept TUSK."
No.
Easy there buddy. Tusk is...well Tusk is Tusk. Tireddawg 12.20.17
-
Pass a rule that says every NIL dollar has to be routed through the school's official NIL fund and enforce it harshly, both by the NCAA and the IRS.
Install an MLB-style "luxury tax" that transfers some NIL funds from the higher $ schools in a conference to the lower $ in a conference. Not in-between conferences transfers, just moving money around within the conferences, to make each conference more competitive.
Allow transfers without sitting out a year only when transferring from a school to a lower NIL cap. Talent should trickle down, not up. If you transfer to a school with a higher NIL cap, you have to sit out a year.
Those 3 things would help a lot and make the product on the field more interesting without totally overthrowing the social order.
-
Originally Posted by
BeardoMSU
So you're saying we should dig up Che's hacked up body from Bolivia and appoint him head of the NCAA?****
No. I am saying we need to put a mule face New York Congresswoman in charge of NCAA. Football.
-
We had 2 very very very good playoff games and then everyone freaks out when Georgia blows out tcu
We were guranteed a blowout playoff game we always get one. I?ve seen many blowouts in the nfl this year but yeah not a 65-7 national title game
The moment was too big for tcu
Now on to the question
I think some of the issue with college football is the fact that outside of the South . Not many people even pay attention to college football or college sports at all compared to professional.
Huge states like California and New York that are loaded with talented football players out of high school give 0 shits about investing in a football program and being die hard for it
College football has always been like this always will be . Sometimes games like this will happen
Lots of southern elite boosters will dump all their money into their alum?s football program just to have something to brag about over their neighbor. That?s just how it is and always will be.
It?s all about matchups and tcu matched up horrifically with Georgia
Tcu would?ve beaten Ohio state but Ohio state could match up with Georgia better than tcu could.
I bet Texas and A&M have been pissed off that a little school like tcu can spend a quarter of what they spend on football and they can spent millions of more dollars and buy recruits and A&M can?t even make a damn bowl game
I think college football will get very interesting here very very soon and especially in the sec
Kirby and Georgia have begun a dynasty
Saban and bama aren?t going anywhere
LSU and Brian Kelly be competiting with them as well
Jimbo and A$M are going to throw enough money at it and eventually it may work with or without jimbo
Tennessee and heupel are building something
And then the one I am absolutely terrified of
Hugh freeze and Auburn. They will be a force to recogn with very soon.
-
Originally Posted by
Quaoarsking
There's a reason the NFL gets higher ratings, even when it seems to obvious to most of us that college football is more compelling.
Because all the major markets watch it.
-
Originally Posted by
smootness
Will never happen. They’re not about to cut 2,000+ scholarships.
They cut from 105 to 85. So it's been done before.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.