-
Originally Posted by
msstate7
If we lose him bc of money, we suck
Name the last coach we lost bc of money??? I'll answer, never
-
Give him the title assistant head coach and defensive coordinator
Pay him 2.5 million per year if not more.
-
Originally Posted by
Homedawg
Name the last coach we lost bc of money??? I'll answer, never
Maybe because we never had a coach that was worth emptying the bank for??
-
Originally Posted by
parabrave
Maybe because we never had a coach that was worth emptying the bank for??
My point is more, they left bc they got a better job. Would could empty the bank and it won't matter. And I'm not saying not to take care of ones that deserve it. But it's just a gesture if they want to go, they are gone.
-
Originally Posted by
Homedawg
Name the last coach we lost bc of money??? I'll answer, never
You sure we didn't lose Diaz to Texas because of money after 2010?
"We will have no problem in handling Kentucky."-Turfdawg67. MSU suffered a 27-17 defeat in 2022 with 225 yards in total offense.
-
Originally Posted by
msu15
You sure we didn't lose Diaz to Texas because of money after 2010?
Manny also tired of getting chewed out on national TV.
-
Originally Posted by
msu15
You sure we didn't lose Diaz to Texas because of money after 2010?
Nope. He went to UT because it was a better job. Did he get paid more? Yes. Has the pay been the same he was gone.
-
-
Originally Posted by
Lord McBuckethead
Vic Shaffer
Another example of not about the money.
-
Originally Posted by
Lord McBuckethead
Vic Shaffer
Another that didn't leave bc of money. Y'all keep coming w wrong answers and I'll keep shooting them down
-
Originally Posted by
Lord McBuckethead
Vic Shaffer
Nope; $$$ was never a factor.
-
Originally Posted by
Homedawg
Name the last coach we lost bc of money??? I'll answer, never
That's a chicken or the egg discussion:
You're saying we don't loose coaches to money, we only lose them to programs with more success. However, the only reason those programs have more success is because they have more money, and it just so happens that every coach that leaves here gets a big pay bump. Was it the mig pay bump that motivate the move, or the name on the jersey? But again even if it's the name on the jersey, it's still "money" that's the ultimate reason we couldn't keep him because money is what drives prestige
-
Originally Posted by
the_real_MSU_is_us
That's a chicken or the egg discussion:
You're saying we don't loose coaches to money, we only lose them to programs with more success. However, the only reason those programs have more success is because they have more money, and it just so happens that every coach that leaves here gets a big pay bump. Was it the mig pay bump that motivate the move, or the name on the jersey? But again even if it's the name on the jersey, it's still "money" that's the ultimate reason we couldn't keep him because money is what drives prestige
So if we offer the same or more and he still leaves for the bigger program, does that still mean he left for more money?
-
Originally Posted by
DownwardDawg
So if we offer the same or more and he still leaves for the bigger program, does that still mean he left for more money?
It means he left for the prestige the jersey gives him. But the jersey only provides prestige because the boosters pay enough to win. So from a short term standpoint? If we match an offer and the coach leaves, it wasn't about money. From a big picture view? Yes, its about us being poor. If we had OSU money we'd be prestigious enough to where coaches would stay.
-
Originally Posted by
the_real_MSU_is_us
That's a chicken or the egg discussion:
You're saying we don't loose coaches to money, we only lose them to programs with more success. However, the only reason those programs have more success is because they have more money, and it just so happens that every coach that leaves here gets a big pay bump. Was it the mig pay bump that motivate the move, or the name on the jersey? But again even if it's the name on the jersey, it's still "money" that's the ultimate reason we couldn't keep him because money is what drives prestige
We matched offers in several cases. They left. You can chicken or egg all you want, they left for better jobs. Collins to Fla. Mullen to Florida. Diaz to Texas, Diaz to miami. Shaeffer to ut do I need to keep going???? Sticklin to Fla. cohen to auburn. Smdh.
-
Originally Posted by
Homedawg
We matched offers in several cases. They left. You can chicken or egg all you want, they left for better jobs. Collins to Fla. Mullen to Florida. Diaz to Texas, Diaz to miami. Shaeffer to ut do I need to keep going???? Sticklin to Fla. cohen to auburn. Smdh.
Right... notice that every single one of the schools you mentioned as being a "better program" are also far richer than us? That's my point- money = success, which = the pecking order of which programs are better than others. For example, one of the things that prevents us from winning big is lack of NIL money. Auburn has it in spades, thus they'll win more, and being a DC there is more likely to get a HC job than being a DC here is. But if you take away their booster money they wouldn't recruit better than us and after a decade their perception would be the same as ours.
So even if you match the salary offer today, the fact the other program is "better" than us is due to our lack of money yesterday.
-
Originally Posted by
the_real_MSU_is_us
Right... notice that every single one of the schools you mentioned as being a "better program" are also far richer than us? That's my point- money = success, which = the pecking order of which programs are better than others. For example, one of the things that prevents us from winning big is lack of NIL money. Auburn has it in spades, thus they'll win more, and being a DC there is more likely to get a HC job than being a DC here is. But if you take away their booster money they wouldn't recruit better than us and after a decade their perception would be the same as ours.
So even if you match the salary offer today, the fact the other program is "better" than us is due to our lack of money yesterday.
Well, we are never ever ever having as much money as them so....
-
Originally Posted by
Homedawg
Well, we are never ever ever having as much money as them so....
Correct. We will never be able to recruit on a top 15 level, thus we will never be able to win it all and only occasionally be able to compete at a top 10 level.
-
Originally Posted by
Homedawg
Name the last coach we lost bc of money??? I'll answer, never
Lost Manny Diaz to Texas
OXFORD, Miss. (WTVA) - Ole Miss campus police ask students to behave at future baseball games following a recent incident.
The university said students were reportedly throwing rocks at Georgia baseball players during last weekend's series.
-
Originally Posted by
FISHDAWG
Lost Manny Diaz to Texas
AGAIN, we didn't lose him bc of money. We lost him bc it's a better job!!!! Omg
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.