-
Originally Posted by
viverlibre
Dude, give it up, we have the dumbest fan base in America. DCs scheme to make the matchups one on one, especially with their best rusher vs our worst blocker. With no running game and an immobile QD, DCs salivate on these matchups. We either have to add in more runs/draws, etc., or get rid of the ball much faster. It's never can our 3 block their 5.
The 3 vs 5 people are the same that say, "Leach's offense has worked everywhere, it'll work here," and, "a third-year starting QB in Leach's offense has always won 9 games."
1. Everything works until it doesn't, and 2. Leach's previous teams probably haven't had to face the reigning national champion and the presumptive number one team and at least two more top 10 recruiters and several more top 20 recruiters.
Additionally, saying, "we have to block them," is not a solution when it's been proven we can't block them. That requires planning and strategy, doing something the D doesn't expect, something they'll have to adjust to, something different.
It worked last year as good as almost any offense in our history has worked. It was inconsistent at times, but what the hell are you people watching? The shit works. It may not be as exciting as you want it to be, but that's your own problem. Our defense and special teams is the reason we didn't win 9 or 10 games last year.
-
Originally Posted by
Jarius
It worked last year as good as almost any offense in our history has worked.
What? It was only our 5th highest Scoring average in the last 10 years. Hell, even Ralph and the 2010 O scored as much
Last edited by Coach34; 08-31-2022 at 10:26 AM.
Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is
-
Originally Posted by
Coach34
What? It was only out 5th highest Scoring average in the last 10 years. Hell, even Ralph and the 2010 O scored as much
How many times did Dan come from three scores down to win a game?
Use your Google Fu and let me know.
-
Originally Posted by
TrapGame
How many times did Dan come from three scores down to win a game?
Use your Google Fu and let me know.
Unless it was Bama he rarely had to
Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is
-
Originally Posted by
Coach34
Unless it was Bama he rarely had to
C'mon mane.
We got two scores down, much less three, on any SEC team and it was over. We are running a system built for comebacks. Boring or not.
But again, carry on.
-
Originally Posted by
TrapGame
We got two scores down, much less three, on any SEC team and it was over. We are running a system built for comebacks.
Interesting hill to die on- getting down by multiple TD's in games....But whatever
And Mullen came back to beat UPig after being down 14-0 in his next to last SEC game. Carry on.
Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is
-
Originally Posted by
Coach34
Interesting hill to die on- getting down by multiple TD's in games....But whatever
And Mullen came back to beat UPig after being down 14-0 in his next to last SEC game. Carry on.
Nah, I'm just looking at the flowers on this hill.
Your Google Fu works though.
-
Originally Posted by
Coach34
Unless it was Bama he rarely had to
For real. People talk we are bracket racing.
-
Originally Posted by
Coach34
What? It was only our 5th highest Scoring average in the last 10 years. Hell, even Ralph and the 2010 O scored as much
The last 10 years has been most our best offenses in our history.
-
Originally Posted by
Jarius
The last 10 years has been most our best offenses in our history.
As it is with most schools around the country. The last 20 years has been an offensive explosion in NCAA Football. We just chose to waste 5 years of it with Croom.
Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is
-
Originally Posted by
Coach34
As it is with most schools around the country. The last 20 years has been an offensive explosion in NCAA Football. We just chose to waste 5 years of it with Croom.
Cool. So like I said, last year was one of our most productive offenses in school history in year 2 of Leach. Not sure what the argument is. Everyone views Mullen’s offense as our standard for success and he already has one that would be a top 5 Mullen offense in year 2.
Last edited by Jarius; 08-31-2022 at 12:03 PM.
-
Originally Posted by
Jarius
Cool. So like I said, last year was one of our most productive offenses in school history in year 2 of Leach. Not sure what the argument is. Everyone views Mullen’s offense as our standard for success and he already has one that would be a top 5 Mullen offense in year 2.
I just want us punting less this year. In the first three games of the season we punted 17 times. That is simply too much. We only scored 13 points against a shitty bears defense while the game was in doubt.
We definitely had some fun games last year, i've talked about how much I loved the AU game last year, but our offense was extremely frustrating at times last year. I'm hoping for less of that this year. I really thought after the UK game and AU game we had turned a corner. The egg and bowl game made me wonder.
-
Originally Posted by
HancockCountyDog
I just want us punting less this year. In the first three games of the season we punted 17 times. That is simply too much. We only scored 13 points against a shitty bears defense while the game was in doubt.
We definitely had some fun games last year, i've talked about how much I loved the AU game last year, but our offense was extremely frustrating at times last year. I'm hoping for less of that this year. I really thought after the UK game and AU game we had turned a corner. The egg and bowl game made me wonder.
Don’t disagree at all.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.