-
Say what you want BUT
Will Rogers is a much better QB and 10x the QB fit for Mike Leach offense
-
Much better fit, I agree.
Could you imagine will trying to run OM's qb running, throw it deep offense?
-
Almost like there was a reason he didn’t go there. Certain players are built for certain offenses. Rogers is where he should be. Alt was offered I am sure but he was not the top of our wishlist for sure. Sawyer was rated higher and I believe a much better QB for our style of offense.
-
Originally Posted by
SilentSteel16
Almost like there was a reason he didn’t go there. Certain players are built for certain offenses. Rogers is where he should be. Alt was offered I am sure but he was not the top of our wishlist for sure. Sawyer was rated higher and I believe a much better QB for our style of offense.
You made the statement will was the better qb and justified it by saying he fits leach's offense better. Would Rogers be the "much better qb" in their offense? Just found your statement weird
-
Let me be clear on this. Will Rogers is a better QB than Altmeyer. Regardless of system this is the case. In Mike Leach system Will Rogers is 10x the QB of Altmeyer. For your sake of argument, Tom Brady would not fit a QB run offense for crap, Will Rogers fits the Brady mold better than Alt, Alt fits the Vick role better than Rogers, hell if you talk about schemes, Plumlee is a better QB than Alt in a QB running offense.
-
Originally Posted by
SilentSteel16
Let me be clear on this. Will Rogers is a better QB than Altmeyer. Regardless of system this is the case. In Mike Leach system Will Rogers is 10x the QB of Altmeyer. For your sake of argument, Tom Brady would not fit a QB run offense for crap, Will Rogers fits the Brady mold better than Alt, Alt fits the Vick role better than Rogers, hell if you talk about schemes, Plumlee is a better QB than Alt in a QB running offense.
Nah, you gotta be able to run and hit the long pass. Plumlee can't hit the pass part
-
And yes, I would rather have Rogers over Alt in any offense that requires a QB to make decisions with the ball. Rogers is not mobile I get that, most pocket QBs are not mobile. Pocket QBs are more in demand than scramblers. Again it depends on the system but if Either Manning was in same draft as Vick, Vick would have gone 3rd QB off the board unless there was a non traditional team dying for a QB.
-
Going to end it like this, if Will Rogers was on that roster at Ole Miss. You would have seen him instead of Alt tonight.
-
I’m still hesitant on this offense. Leach needs to get his shit together and 1) beat kiffin 2) prove his worth in the postseason. Right now history is against him. Regardless of who the qb is.
-
Rogers first action was vs Kentucky...
9/15 43 yds 0 td 2 int
He's came a long way, and I expect altmyer to also. Judging a freshman qb on their first contested outing is dumb
-
Originally Posted by
SilentSteel16
And yes, I would rather have Rogers over Alt in any offense that requires a QB to make decisions with the ball. Rogers is not mobile I get that, most pocket QBs are not mobile. Pocket QBs are more in demand than scramblers. Again it depends on the system but if Either Manning was in same draft as Vick, Vick would have gone 3rd QB off the board unless there was a non traditional team dying for a QB.
Ok. This thread is ridiculously biased and not even attempted to be rooted in discernment or rationale. Your opinion on QBs is extremely warped and should be treated as such. 😂
-
Will can be an all-American, but if Leach doesn't become more innovative it won't matter.
-
Originally Posted by
Cowbell
Will can be an all-American, but if Leach doesn't become more innovative it won't matter.
I can agree with this.
-
Originally Posted by
Dak Holliday
Ok. This thread is ridiculously biased and not even attempted to be rooted in discernment or rationale. Your opinion on QBs is extremely warped and should be treated as such.
Coming from the biggest troll on this site I find your opinion gold.
Not a bias at all Rogers is a better QB than Alt. Alt won’t sniff Matt Corral status at OM. Rogers will set the bar at State.
-
Dak Prescott not this Dak troll has been one of the best ambassadors for our University. He did a tremendous job here for us, but I believe we will achieve more under Rogers/Leach time here than Prescott/Mullins.
-
Originally Posted by
SilentSteel16
Dak Prescott not this Dak troll has been one of the best ambassadors for our University. He did a tremendous job here for us, but I believe we will achieve more under Rogers/Leach time here than Prescott/Mullins.
That's quite a statement. Dak and Dan won 19 games dak's final 2 seasons, made a NY6, and was a playoff committee #1 for what 6 weeks?
-
Originally Posted by
SilentSteel16
Coming from the biggest troll on this site I find your opinion gold.
Not a bias at all Rogers is a better QB than Alt. Alt won’t sniff Matt Corral status at OM. Rogers will set the bar at State.
I?ve stated that he will set the bar at MSU as well. This doesn?t take a genius to see. Dealing 40 5 yd passes a game does not a good QB make. He will own the stat sheet at the cost of us running a better offensive scheme. Also, Will is not mobile by pocket passer standards. And I appreciate that you see me as a troll. Most overly sensitive fanboys do. So, don?t let me keep you from your anime, Silent Steel. It?s getting late. 😂
-
Originally Posted by
SilentSteel16
Dak Prescott not this Dak troll has been one of the best ambassadors for our University. He did a tremendous job here for us, but I believe we will achieve more under Rogers/Leach time here than Prescott/Mullins.
😂 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 😂😂😂😂
-
Yes it is, I believe in the talent this team will have. Do I believe we need some breaks to go our way? Absolutely. Just like with Daks team, they had some breaks as well. The talent will be there to outscore opponents. Could CML bend some and change up play calls? Absolutely. Could Dan Mullen call something besides one of his 4 plays? No. Did either CML or Mullen have a chance to beat Alabama, No. could Leach do it, yes.
Call me a homer all you want, but I do believe in this team especially if we can keep Arnett.
-
Originally Posted by
SilentSteel16
Yes it is, I believe in the talent this team will have. Do I believe we need some breaks to go our way? Absolutely. Just like with Daks team, they had some breaks as well. The talent will be there to outscore opponents. Could CML bend some and change up play calls? Absolutely. Could Dan Mullen call something besides one of his 4 plays? No. Did either CML or Mullen have a chance to beat Alabama, No. could Leach do it, yes.
Call me a homer all you want, but I do believe in this team especially if we can keep Arnett.
One thing I’ll agree with here. Leach can beat Saban. Mullen never was nor will.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.