Quote Originally Posted by ShotgunDawg View Post
Eye test. Stats are virtually meaningless in this offense & inaccurate to look at unless they're outrageous

Grade Rogers on following compared to quality college QBs:

Arm strength: Above average, normal, below average

Speed: Above average, normal, below average

Athleticism: Above average, normal, below average

Quickness: Above average, normal, below average

Accuracy: Above average, normal, below average

For me, it breaks down like this:

Arm strength: Above average, normal, below average

Speed: Above average, normal, below average

Athleticism: Above average, normal, below average

Quickness: Above average, normal, below average

Accuracy: Above average, normal, below average

Field vision: Above average, Normal, Below average

Processing Speed: Above average, Normal, Below average

would love to hear your thoughts on where you disagree here. It's pointless to talk players unless we're speaking the same language
It's pointless to talk players when you don't view them objectively using statistics rather than the eye test which is completely biased. You say all of the
QBs that prediction pain talked about were more talented than Rogers yet they were older than rogers in the system? Would it not be more wise to compare Rogers to them once he has matured to their age rather than a growing QB. You spit your opinion as if it is fact. It doesn't work that way