-
Originally Posted by
Todd4State
It's just that he seems like he's more of a fit for an analyst role than a recruiting coordinator role to me. So let's say he replaces Arnett in a year or two at DC. Then we have to hire another recruiting coordinator again.
Honestly Hughes fits better at the RC role IMO. Hopson is probably a better on the field coach than Hughes. I mean, if you say Jay Hopson I have never ever heard anyone talk about what a great recruiter he is/was. See Will Hall at the same school being talked about as a great recruiter so it isn't a USM thing.
Heck- I'd hire Reed Stringer as the RC before I hire Hopson and he was on Hopson's staff. At least that hire would make some sense.
Coach Petterson had ZERO experience in college recruiting or coaching when we hired him..
again I’m not saying this is a homer in hire, but there is a lot that goes on with Coach Peterson position than just recruiting..
and no one here or one coach in Miss knew who the hell Coach Vilagrana was..
Getting an Ex college head coach , a position coach that has been at multiple P5 schools, and a coach that has Miss ties is never a bad thing.
-
Originally Posted by
Todd4State
It's just that he seems like he's more of a fit for an analyst role than a recruiting coordinator role to me. So let's say he replaces Arnett in a year or two at DC. Then we have to hire another recruiting coordinator again.
Honestly Hughes fits better at the RC role IMO. Hopson is probably a better on the field coach than Hughes. I mean, if you say Jay Hopson I have never ever heard anyone talk about what a great recruiter he is/was. See Will Hall at the same school being talked about as a great recruiter so it isn't a USM thing.
Heck- I'd hire Reed Stringer as the RC before I hire Hopson and he was on Hopson's staff. At least that hire would make some sense.
Hopson isn't taking the Recruiting Coordinator role. He's taking the HS Relations role.
-
Originally Posted by
Ifyouonlyknew
Hopson isn't taking the Recruiting Coordinator role. He's taking the HS Relations role.
My point is why have him on the recruiting staff at all? That's even worse if high school coaches don't like him.
-
Originally Posted by
Todd4State
My point is why have him on the recruiting staff at all? That's even worse if high school coaches don't like him.
Because the talk of HS coaches not liking him is way overblown. Say 5-10 coaches don't like him he'll there's over 100 who don't fit in that category. Let's not act like every HS coach liked Peterson & he did fine. A guy who's head of HS relations who's worked in the state 16 out of the last 20 years. Yea I'm good with that. The overthink & overreach on this hire is funny.
-
Originally Posted by
Ifyouonlyknew
Because the talk of HS coaches not liking him is way overblown. Say 5-10 coaches don't like him he'll there's over 100 who don't fit in that category. Let's not act like every HS coach liked Peterson & he did fine. A guy who's head of HS relations who's worked in the state 16 out of the last 20 years. Yea I'm good with that. The overthink & overreach on this hire is funny.
Exactly... Damn
-
Originally Posted by
Ifyouonlyknew
Because the talk of HS coaches not liking him is way overblown. Say 5-10 coaches don't like him he'll there's over 100 who don't fit in that category. Let's not act like every HS coach liked Peterson & he did fine. A guy who's head of HS relations who's worked in the state 16 out of the last 20 years. Yea I'm good with that. The overthink & overreach on this hire is funny.
Because those 5-10 have guys on their staff that will possibly become head coaches one day. That can spread throughout the state pretty quickly.
But hey! We're Mississippi State! We don't care about recruiting or value it. And this is another sign of it.
Tony Hughes will solve everything right?**
It's only the weakest aspect of our program right now and is holding us back. We don't make moves like this in baseball. But we want to stay 1990 in football apparently.
Again- why not make Hopson an analyst and hire a recruiting person that has no ill will against him? What's wrong with that?
-
Originally Posted by
Todd4State
Because those 5-10 have guys on their staff that will possibly become head coaches one day. That can spread throughout the state pretty quickly.
But hey! We're Mississippi State! We don't care about recruiting or value it. And this is another sign of it.
Tony Hughes will solve everything right?**
It's only the weakest aspect of our program right now and is holding us back. We don't make moves like this in baseball. But we want to stay 1990 in football apparently.
Again- why not make Hopson an analyst and hire a recruiting person that has no ill will against him? What's wrong with that?
Just curious, who would you rather see get the job? If you can name a guy with equal or greater experience inside this state who is 100% liked by the coaches in the state, then I'll be all for it. But he has to be liked by every single coach now. If he's disliked by one HS coach, that coach's assistants will go on to be head coaches, and I heard that stuff can spread throughout the state pretty quickly.**
Your entire post is an overreaction.
-
Originally Posted by
Ifyouonlyknew
Hopson isn't taking the Recruiting Coordinator role. He's taking the HS Relations role.
We'll disagree on this one. I'm ok with that. And he's not going to directly recruit. His swing is in SW MS. But he's got a lot of baggage- Bad baggage, to go along with the other (not going to get into it because he's already hired anyway). Hell, we could've hired Barney and it wouldn't be much difference (except for the official paperwork). Similar character types.
-
Originally Posted by
Todd4State
What's wrong with that?
Because I think you're wrong.
-
Originally Posted by
Cooterpoot
We'll disagree on this one. I'm ok with that. And he's not going to directly recruit. His swing is in SW MS. But he's got a lot of baggage- Bad baggage, to go along with the other (not going to get into it because he's already hired anyway). Hell, we could've hired Barney and it wouldn't be much difference (except for the official paperwork). Similar character types.
Yea we'll just have to agree to disagree
-
Originally Posted by
Ifyouonlyknew
Because I think you're wrong.
OK- so it's wrong to hire someone that high school coaches like at MSU.
-
Originally Posted by
KOdawg1
Just curious, who would you rather see get the job? If you can name a guy with equal or greater experience inside this state who is 100% liked by the coaches in the state, then I'll be all for it. But he has to be liked by every single coach now. If he's disliked by one HS coach, that coach's assistants will go on to be head coaches, and I heard that stuff can spread throughout the state pretty quickly.**
Your entire post is an overreaction.
Reed Stringer would be good.
-
Originally Posted by
Todd4State
OK- so it's wrong to hire someone that high school coaches like at MSU.
There is nobody that every coach is going to like. That candidate doesn't exist.
-
Originally Posted by
Todd4State
Reed Stringer would be good.
Now if you said Reed Stringer for Villagrana spot that would make more sense IMO. I'd personally rather have someone from outside the area but I'd understand the support for Stringer.
-
Welp, this is in the weeds. Back to the core point about off field recruiting staff:
Hell yes we can, and should, hire more.
We profited 10M a year for several years in a row, which went into a "rainy day fund". Even if Covid cost us 33% of our revenue (it didn't due to the SEC network paying out so much) that still leaves money in the bank. Not "we are in small amounts of debt", MONEY IS STILL IN THE BANK! And next this year with the vaccine we can expect to run at least close to a profit. And in 2 years the extra $20M a year of TV revenue kicks in.
Hiring 5 guys at 100k each to help recruiting is a drop in the bucket. It doesn't cause us to go into debt, and if it did that debt would be paid off like nothing when the TV deal kicks in.
As for it "not moving the needle", well that's ridiculous. Bama and UGA spend millions on their off field staff for a reason. Of course it matters. If it going to get our recruiting classes from #25 to #20? NO, but it might make it #23-24, and with how much money football brings in that small bit of gain = far more money than it costs us.
-
Originally Posted by
the_real_MSU_is_us
Welp, this is in the weeds. Back to the core point about off field recruiting staff:
Hell yes we can, and should, hire more.
We profited 10M a year for several years in a row, which went into a "rainy day fund". Even if Covid cost us 33% of our revenue (it didn't due to the SEC network paying out so much) that still leaves money in the bank. Not "we are in small amounts of debt", MONEY IS STILL IN THE BANK! And next this year with the vaccine we can expect to run at least close to a profit. And in 2 years the extra $20M a year of TV revenue kicks in.
Hiring 5 guys at 100k each to help recruiting is a drop in the bucket. It doesn't cause us to go into debt, and if it did that debt would be paid off like nothing when the TV deal kicks in.
As for it "not moving the needle", well that's ridiculous. Bama and UGA spend millions on their off field staff for a reason. Of course it matters. If it going to get our recruiting classes from #25 to #20? NO, but it might make it #23-24, and with how much money football brings in that small bit of gain = far more money than it costs us.
Agree...
-
Originally Posted by
Ifyouonlyknew
Because the talk of HS coaches not liking him is way overblown. Say 5-10 coaches don't like him he'll there's over 100 who don't fit in that category. Let's not act like every HS coach liked Peterson & he did fine. A guy who's head of HS relations who's worked in the state 16 out of the last 20 years. Yea I'm good with that. The overthink & overreach on this hire is funny.
I'm pretty sure there was a good bit of bitching about how Peterson was a bad fit because he was arrogant and HS coaches hated him around the state? Am I thinking of another guy that came from high school coaching to our staff?
-
Originally Posted by
Johnson85
I'm pretty sure there was a good bit of bitching about how Peterson was a bad fit because he was arrogant and HS coaches hated him around the state? Am I thinking of another guy that came from high school coaching to our staff?
You're correct
-
Everyone needs to move on. I shouldn't have stirred this. I only give out what I know. Or in this case, a small fraction of that. He's hired. It's done, so we can all move on.
-
Well, not that it has anything to do with the subject, but
Alcorn has won 3 straight Division Titles since Hopson.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.