Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: New NCAA rule basically giving every player a pass on eligibility this year

  1. #1
    Senior Member Todd4State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    43,798
    vCash
    3700

    New NCAA rule basically giving every player a pass on eligibility this year

    Is going to make our roster interesting for the next 5-6 years.

    A guy like Will Rogers could be our QB for the 24-25 season. It almost combines our class from last year with this year's class. Everyone is getting a free year to develop players. And then the class of 2022 in Mississippi is already looking strong especially on the defensive side of the ball. We really could be set up well in a few years because I imagine Alabama and LSU are still going to lose most of their better guys to the NFL.

    Essentially everyone has become BYU for about half of a decade.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    13,745
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by Todd4State View Post
    Is going to make our roster interesting for the next 5-6 years.

    A guy like Will Rogers could be our QB for the 24-25 season. It almost combines our class from last year with this year's class. Everyone is getting a free year to develop players. And then the class of 2022 in Mississippi is already looking strong especially on the defensive side of the ball. We really could be set up well in a few years because I imagine Alabama and LSU are still going to lose most of their better guys to the NFL.

    Essentially everyone has become BYU for about half of a decade.
    Just as baseball expect this to be an epic f up from the start. .... this is a trickle down mess.

  3. #3
    Senior Member BeardoMSU's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    The gettin' place
    Posts
    19,910
    vCash
    53100
    Quote Originally Posted by Homedawg View Post
    ... this is a trickle down mess.
    I'm curious about how this will get figured out as well.

    Just on the surface, I do think it will benefit programs like us more so than the blue bloods, though, as their elite players will be going pro regardless.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    13,745
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by BeardoMSU View Post
    I'm curious about how this will get figured out as well.

    Just on the surface, I do think it will benefit programs like us more so than the blue bloods, though, as their elite players will be going pro regardless.
    If it's just like baseball, and the sr don't count against the number, and I expect that to be the case it could help us more. But it's a long term mess wo upping limits. Just Typical stupidity.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    6,745
    vCash
    55927
    Quote Originally Posted by Homedawg View Post
    If it's just like baseball, and the sr don't count against the number, and I expect that to be the case it could help us more. But it's a long term mess wo upping limits. Just Typical stupidity.
    Yeah are they planning on no seniors counting the first year only? Cause then year 2 you would have to recruit a lot less kids.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Jack Lambert's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    misippi
    Posts
    13,657
    vCash
    2238605444
    Quote Originally Posted by BeardoMSU View Post
    I'm curious about how this will get figured out as well.

    Just on the surface, I do think it will benefit programs like us more so than the blue bloods, though, as their elite players will be going pro regardless.
    Where it will help us vs blue blood is depth chart. We will have more depth a depth they already have. Just opinion.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    13,745
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by Cowbell View Post
    Yeah are they planning on no seniors counting the first year only? Cause then year 2 you would have to recruit a lot less kids.
    That's what the baseball coaches have been told. The football people I've spoken w thus far don't know for sure but it's a mess for a while wo upping limits.

  8. #8
    Senior Member Cooterpoot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    13,087
    vCash
    52714
    Just means kids will get processed.

  9. #9
    Senior Member ShotgunDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    37,277
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by Cooterpoot View Post
    Just means kids will get processed.
    According to Daniel Jeremiah, players using their extra year won?t count vs the 85 or in our case 83 for in 2021

    So, if Costello were to come back, we could have 84. If Hill also comes back then we could have 85. And so on and so on.

    Yes, it will help our depth if guys stay.

    https://twitter.com/movethesticks/st...915882496?s=21
    CAN'T PUT A SADDLE ON A MUSTANG

    Quit Your Bi$&$&?!, He's Not Going to Run the Ball More

  10. #10
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    7,872
    vCash
    52060
    I wouldn't expect KJ or Hill to return in 2021, but we might be really good if they both did. Glad to know they at least have the option.

  11. #11
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    7,872
    vCash
    52060
    We might see some NCAA career records fall over the next few years, as some players somewhere will start for 5 solid years.

  12. #12
    Senior Member ShotgunDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    37,277
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by Quaoarsking View Post
    I wouldn't expect KJ or Hill to return in 2021, but we might be really good if they both did. Glad to know they at least have the option.
    Kylin - no chance

    Costello - 10% chance. Depends on how good he is this year. No reason to leave as a 5th-7th rounder

    Kobe Jones - 55%

    Marquiss Spencer - 30%

    Errol - 2%

    Osiris Mitchell - 40% depends on his year.

    Fred Peters - 60%

    Eiland - 50%

    Payton - 60%. 2 years with Leach could give him an NFL career

    Parker - 30%

    Jones - 60%

    CJ Morgan - 70%



    I think in all you’ll see our JUCO guys really use it the most. They benefit the most from the extra year because most of them never red shirted and weren’t quite ready for the SEC their 1st year at MSU
    Last edited by ShotgunDawg; 08-21-2020 at 09:37 PM.
    CAN'T PUT A SADDLE ON A MUSTANG

    Quit Your Bi$&$&?!, He's Not Going to Run the Ball More

  13. #13
    Senior Member Jack Lambert's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    misippi
    Posts
    13,657
    vCash
    2238605444
    If all this is true it a peace offering to the Big 10 Parents.

  14. #14
    Senior Member BeardoMSU's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    The gettin' place
    Posts
    19,910
    vCash
    53100
    Quote Originally Posted by ShotgunDawg View Post
    Kylin - no chance

    Costello - 10% chance. Depends on how good he is this year. No reason to leave as a 5th-7th rounder

    Kobe Jones - 55%

    Marquiss Spencer - 30%

    Errol - 2%

    Osiris Mitchell - 40% depends on his year.

    Fred Peters - 60%

    Eiland - 50%

    Payton - 60%. 2 years with Leach could give him an NFL career

    Parker - 30%

    Jones - 60%

    CJ Morgan - 70%



    I think in all you’ll see our JUCO guys really use it the most. They benefit the most from the extra year because most of them never red shirted and weren’t quite ready for the SEC their 1st year at MSU
    Will this policy apply to former players? Would be great if Dak could get that 6th year.**

  15. #15
    Senior Member Cooterpoot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    13,087
    vCash
    52714
    Quote Originally Posted by ShotgunDawg View Post
    According to Daniel Jeremiah, players using their extra year won?t count vs the 85 or in our case 83 for in 2021

    So, if Costello were to come back, we could have 84. If Hill also comes back then we could have 85. And so on and so on.

    Yes, it will help our depth if guys stay.

    https://twitter.com/movethesticks/st...915882496?s=21
    I mean overall, you'll see teams processing kids. Schools can't afford scholarships beyond a certain number. The NCAA isn't going to cover that cost. Already have seen it in baseball.

  16. #16
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    7,872
    vCash
    52060
    Quote Originally Posted by Quaoarsking View Post
    We might see some NCAA career records fall over the next few years, as some players somewhere will start for 5 solid years.
    School records too. Our career records in receiving are 199 catches (Ross), 2,528 yards (Ross), and 24 touchdowns (Bumphis). I could see Tyrell Shavers or even Austin William's approaching or beating those marks if they have 3 years to do it in a Leach offense.

    Osirus Mitchell is currently at 60/908/10 and might have a shot at the last 2 at least in 2 years.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.