-
Fauci Says Probably No Football (at least NFL)
-
Fauci?s 15 minutes of fame are up... he did his job for Soros.
-
he's been right so often!
-
You can't allow protests and not allow people to go to football games. Period.
-
Originally Posted by
Leeshouldveflanked
Fauci?s 15 minutes of fame are up... he did his job for Soros.
How does Soros have any money left?
He seems to be paying everyone****.
-
If we have football this season, it will be really different. I got an email from the ticket office telling me I could elect not to go to games this year but keep my seats and parking for next year. Tells me that they are at least planning for a smaller percentage of fans. My guess is 25-50 at the most. No looking good for football
-
Originally Posted by
Todd4State
You can't allow protests and not allow people to go to football games. Period.
Not on pure principle, no, but in practice it's plausible to say you can't stop demonstrations in publicly accessible open spaces while you can just keep the gates locked at a football stadium.
A better comparison and what will be interesting to see is the response to public outdoor tailgate-like gatherings to watch games relative to the protests.
-
Originally Posted by
thf24
Not on pure principle, no, but in practice it's plausible to say you can't stop demonstrations in publicly accessible open spaces while you can just keep the gates locked at a football stadium.
A better comparison and what will be interesting to see is the response to public outdoor tailgate-like gatherings to watch games relative to the protests.
If people try to stop fans from coming to SEC football games after they sat around and watched millions of protesters cluster up next to each other all over the country it's going to be political suicide in the South. People aren't going to do that to their careers. The protests completely ended the country's give a shit about this virus. When that wasn't squashed it became crystal clear that the people in charge don't truly believe what they are telling people to do and they aren't going to listen to it any more.
-
Fauci is the biggest cheerleader for the virus...
-
Originally Posted by
Todd4State
You can't allow protests and not allow people to go to football games. Period.
Why not? They won't let people go to church.
-
Originally Posted by
SheltonChoked
How does Soros have any money left?
He seems to be paying everyone****.
Was funny in your head.
*********************************** (can do that too)
-
Originally Posted by
PMDawg
Why not? They won't let people go to church.
That's bullshit too.
-
Originally Posted by
thf24
Not on pure principle, no, but in practice it's plausible to say you can't stop demonstrations in publicly accessible open spaces while you can just keep the gates locked at a football stadium.
Think they will have a bigger 'protest' ..After they allowed, almost encouraged, violent protests and looting.
US Constitution, First amendment .. Congress shall make no law respecting .. or the right of the people peaceably to assemble**
No problem really .. MSU fans arrive to DWS, at game time to protest 'racist' visiting team. That should work..
Coach34 .. "We're not hiring the ****ing Pirate at Miss State. GTFO"
-
Originally Posted by
Ari Gold
Fauci is the biggest cheerleader for the virus...
Yep which is why he needs to go away.
-
Originally Posted by
Todd4State
That's bullshit too.
Church is only thing shut down that used to have Constitutional protection.
All our freedoms are being taken away. Freedom of speech is completely gone unless you go along with national media narrative.
-
We will play and should have a full stadium
-
Originally Posted by
Todd4State
You can't allow protests and not allow people to go to football games. Period.
You can if you have an agenda.
-
Originally Posted by
Todd4State
You can't allow protests and not allow people to go to football games. Period.
One of those is a guaranteed right by the Constitution, the other is not. The government does not "allow" protest.
-
Originally Posted by
bostondawg
One of those is a guaranteed right by the Constitution, the other is not. The government does not "allow" protest.
Seems to me both are covered by the 1st amendment. "Peaceably assemble" would cover both .. no? As long as protests are peaceful that it.
-
Originally Posted by
dawgday166
Seems to me both are covered by the 1st amendment. "Peaceably assemble" would cover both .. no? As long as protests are peaceful that it.
The right to "peacefully assemble" is indeed guaranteed in public places. That doesn't mean that the specific sport of football is a constitutionally protected right. You can peacefully assemble, but you aren't guaranteed entertainment while you do it.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.