-
TEs in Leach offense
Given the plethora of TE/Hbacks we have on the roster, it is going to be interesting to see what Leach does with them. Historically he has not used them much but he did at UK and OU in his OC days. He used a 2 TE set in the redzone at TTU but you never hardly saw a TE at WSU.
Spivey has more talent than any of them and I think he could make a pretty good X or Z if he will buy in. Jordan Thomas did it in an offense that was run heavy Spivey can do it in the air raid.
-
I heard that they were using Spivey at the inside spot and Dontae Jones at outside receiver. Cumbest should be able to transition to WR pretty easily too I would think whether they have him playing inside or outside receiver I don't know yet.
-
Originally Posted by
Todd4State
I heard that they were using Spivey at the inside spot and Dontae Jones at outside receiver. Cumbest should be able to transition to WR pretty easily too I would think whether they have him playing inside or outside receiver I don't know yet.
Last I heard all the te except Jones we're going inside. If they can play, and we know some of them can, he will figure it out how to use them. No doubt about that to me.
-
they will use them if they are good, but in general would rather have a speed guy/true receiver rather than a TE.
-
After the line splits- this is the 2nd question I'm looking at seeing answered. We do have some TE talent and he has to figure out how to use it the best he can. Again- he is a good offensive mind and should do a good job with it. Look forward to seeing what he does with them
Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is
-
Originally Posted by
Homedawg
Last I heard all the te except Jones we're going inside. If they can play, and we know some of them can, he will figure it out how to use them. No doubt about that to me.
That would have been my guess but this is the first time anyone has confirmed it. He will definitely find a way because Lord knows some people that can catch in this offense.
-
Originally Posted by
HoopsDawg
they will use them if they are good, but in general would rather have a speed guy/true receiver rather than a TE.
If it's me:
X- Tall guy (6'2"-6'5") deep threat.
Slot- Someone like Chad Bumphis.
Y- A Shannon Sharpe type of guy.
Z- Go to guy that can beat you short or deep.
-
I?m still not sure I wouldn?t at least give Spivey a glance as a rush end as some thought he had a better future there out of HS.
But maybe he becomes a big mismatch in some situations at wr
-
Originally Posted by
Irondawg
I?m still not sure I wouldn?t at least give Spivey a glance as a rush end as some thought he had a better future there out of HS.
But maybe he becomes a big mismatch in some situations at wr
From what I heard in what few drills we had before the quarantine he looked good at WR.
-
Originally Posted by
BuckyIsAB****
Given the plethora of TE/Hbacks we have on the roster, it is going to be interesting to see what Leach does with them. Historically he has not used them much but he did at UK and OU in his OC days. He used a 2 TE set in the redzone at TTU but you never hardly saw a TE at WSU.
Spivey has more talent than any of them and I think he could make a pretty good X or Z if he will buy in. Jordan Thomas did it in an offense that was run heavy Spivey can do it in the air raid.
we really only have 3 in Jones, Cumbest, and Spivey. That all have ball skills. Spivey left a few tds on the field last year. I like Jones the best and would try to get him 35 catches this year. Cumbest could be a star in football and he could be the closest guy to Bear Wilson in terms of the way Bear would just bully guys around down the field.
-
Originally Posted by
Coach34
After the line splits- this is the 2nd question I'm looking at seeing answered. We do have some TE talent and he has to figure out how to use it the best he can. Again- he is a good offensive mind and should do a good job with it. Look forward to seeing what he does with them
If you look back at WSU, the offense worked really well despite mediocre wr talent. He was getting mostly 2/3* type guys, with 4.6ish 40 times, and despite gaudy stats only a few ended up getting a look from the league. Our te folks are better wide receivers than he had at WSU.
I doubt that he will recruit more pure te but I think we will fine using these receiver types as the roster evolves over a couple of years.
-
Steve Spurrier Jr. said on Bo Bounds' show the other day that all of our tight ends would move to receiver and we would not play with an attached tight end.
-
I think Spivey can be a weapon for us, especially in the redzone.
-
Originally Posted by
Jarius
Steve Spurrier Jr. said on Bo Bounds' show the other day that all of our tight ends would move to receiver and we would not play with an attached tight end.
That is interesting. I don't see how some of these guys can play WR.
My guess come fall camp, we will have to take advantage of some of these guys skill sets - should be interesting;
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.