-
The reason Coker can transfer to Bama is bc he's graduated from FSU but he's only a rs soph. So he has 2 years of eligibility left instead of 1.

Originally Posted by
HoopsDawg
I thought the SEC put an end to that after Masoli.
-

Originally Posted by
TUSK
Losing cj and haha is huge. Depriest will have to be the leader on D.
Bama should be heavy to solid favs vs: WV, FAU, USM, UF, @OM, @ARK, @UT, MSU, @ WCU... they will also be slight favs vs A&M, @Lsu, @AU...
With that schedule, 9-4 would be a huge disappointment. .. I'd like to see 11 minimum.
You have to play at Auburn again in 2014? Or was that a mistake?
-

Originally Posted by
Todd4State
You have to play at Auburn again in 2014? Or was that a mistake?
Mistake. It's at the Krystal Palace.
"It is not courage to resist TUSK; It is courage to accept TUSK."
No.
Easy there buddy. Tusk is...well Tusk is Tusk. Tireddawg 12.20.17
-
"We will have a bigger, stronger and more athletic starting 22 than Bama."
Huh?
"It is not courage to resist TUSK; It is courage to accept TUSK."
No.
Easy there buddy. Tusk is...well Tusk is Tusk. Tireddawg 12.20.17
-

Originally Posted by
TUSK
"We will have a bigger, stronger and more athletic starting 22 than Bama."
Huh?
We will. List your 22 if you can and we'll compare. Height, weight etc.
-

Originally Posted by
Dawg61
We will. List your 22 if you can and we'll compare. Height, weight etc.
I don't agree with this, although I do think our defense will be good enough and Dak could be the difference maker.
Tusk, why would you consider Bama solid favorites over MSU and OM, but only slight favorites over Texas A&M? A&M should take a fairly large step back next year.
-
Del Rio's sister lives here in Nola. I know her and she's quite a bit of work. She's got the entire $5+ mil mansion to herself most of the year. Very high maintenance but she can be, she's pretty nice on the eyes.
-
If my numbers are correct Bama loses 9 of 22 starters. Both starting DBs, their leaders on D Haha and Mosley, AJ and 2 of their top WR. 9-3 looks way more likely than any NC aspirations next year imo. They don't have a QB right now.
-

Originally Posted by
Dawg61
If my numbers are correct Bama loses 9 of 22 starters. Both starting DBs, their leaders on D Haha and Mosley, AJ and 2 of their top WR. 9-3 looks way more likely than any NC aspirations next year imo. They don't have a QB right now.
This doesn't have much to do with their size, strength, and athleticism. They'll replace their lost starters with some of the best athletes in college football...again.
-

Originally Posted by
Dawg61
We will. List your 22 if you can and we'll compare. Height, weight etc.
Sorry i didn't respond ... got tied up.
The OL will average 6-5/6-6 & ~320#.
LBs will all be 245 - 260 with excellent speed.
DL average will approach if not exceed 300#.
The skill positions on O are terrific.
Major questions for me are 1- can we field a serviceable QB? & 2- Develop some good CBs.?
"It is not courage to resist TUSK; It is courage to accept TUSK."
No.
Easy there buddy. Tusk is...well Tusk is Tusk. Tireddawg 12.20.17
-

Originally Posted by
ShotgunDawg
I don't agree with this, although I do think our defense will be good enough and Dak could be the difference maker.
Tusk, why would you consider Bama solid favorites over MSU and OM, but only slight favorites over Texas A&M? A&M should take a fairly large step back next year.
You're right... a&m is in ttown as well.... they should be a big 'dog in that one.
"It is not courage to resist TUSK; It is courage to accept TUSK."
No.
Easy there buddy. Tusk is...well Tusk is Tusk. Tireddawg 12.20.17
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.