Page 99 of 148 FirstFirst ... 4989979899100101109 ... LastLast
Results 1,961 to 1,980 of 2950

Thread: THE 2020 MSU Football Recruiting Talk Thread

  1. #1961
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    481
    vCash
    3100
    If the on filed issues continue I expect the whole class to implode.

  2. #1962
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    3,003
    vCash
    3100
    2021 Philadelphia athlete Kadarius Calloway commits to State.

    https://247sports.com/Player/Kadariu...oway-46085605/

  3. #1963
    Tha Winnah! ScoobaDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    11,163
    vCash
    2163236147
    Quote Originally Posted by ZedFedder View Post
    2021 Philadelphia athlete Kadarius Calloway commits to State.

    https://247sports.com/Player/Kadariu...oway-46085605/

    What's the story here. unranked. beat out southern miss looks like.

    Oh... he's class of 21.

  4. #1964
    That New Coach - That's better than the Old Coach
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    9,909
    vCash
    3190
    Quote Originally Posted by ZedFedder View Post
    2021 Philadelphia athlete Kadarius Calloway commits to State.

    https://247sports.com/Player/Kadariu...oway-46085605/
    Top 5-10 player in the state next year.

    https://www.hudl.com/video/3/1132375...b1a512bcc60bb5

  5. #1965
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    17,444
    vCash
    2510
    Quote Originally Posted by ScoobaDawg View Post
    What's the story here. unranked. beat out southern miss looks like.

    Oh... he's class of 21.
    Yeah, good player. Hard to get excited about any 2021 kid. I guess JoMo wanted to tweet out some good news.

  6. #1966
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    10,470
    vCash
    3200
    Kid has 8 interceptions this season...Wow!

  7. #1967
    Senior Member KOdawg1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    11,738
    vCash
    966500
    This is what gets me. Joe can recruit. I think he would elevate our talent level here. But its a matter of what he would do with them once they got here thats concerning. I really am rooting for the guy, just for the sole reason that he can recruit very well and seems to take recruiting seriously. But he already has turned Dans recruits soft. Imagine what he will do to his own

  8. #1968
    Senior Member Cooterpoot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    13,086
    vCash
    52714
    Quote Originally Posted by KOdawg1 View Post
    This is what gets me. Joe can recruit. I think he would elevate our talent level here. But its a matter of what he would do with them once they got here thats concerning. I really am rooting for the guy, just for the sole reason that he can recruit very well and seems to take recruiting seriously. But he already has turned Dans recruits soft. Imagine what he will do to his own
    He’s not recruiting better from a talent standpoint. Current class (if it sticks) will finish around 25-30.

  9. #1969
    Senior Member msu15's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    MS
    Posts
    2,034
    vCash
    1053100
    Quote Originally Posted by Cooterpoot View Post
    He’s not recruiting better from a talent standpoint. Current class (if it sticks) will finish around 25-30.
    Mullen’s 3rd class was in the 40’s. He’s recruiting better.

  10. #1970
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    8,831
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by msu15 View Post
    Mullen’s 3rd class was in the 40’s. He’s recruiting better.
    You're right .. what a bummer of a class. Took us to #1.

    So we gotta hope that if he stays, Moorhead can evaluate as well as Mullen. I will say Shrader and the 2 young DBs from last year look very promising. But Moorhead also has to make sure to even out the position groups too ... which is probably Mullen's main fault.

  11. #1971
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    74,793
    vCash
    10439
    Quote Originally Posted by msu15 View Post
    Mullen’s 3rd class was in the 40’s. He’s recruiting better.
    If you're gonna compare 3rd class to 3rd class, seems comparing the 3 classes leading up to each tenure is important for context.

    Before Mullen... 2006-8: 40th, 34th, 53rd (avg 42.3)
    Mullen... 2009-11: 18th, 30th, 41st (avg 29.7)

    Mullen... 2015-17: 18th, 28th, 24th (avg 23.3)
    Moorhead... 2018-20: 27th, 24th, ?

    So Mullen in his first 3 classes raised our recruiting rankings over croom's last 3 by 12.6 spots.

    Moorhead's 3rd class isn't complete, but he has to finish 19th this season just to tie Mullen's last 3. Doubt that happens

  12. #1972
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    10,470
    vCash
    3200
    Quote Originally Posted by msstate7 View Post
    If you're gonna compare 3rd class to 3rd class, seems comparing the 3 classes leading up to each tenure is important for context.

    Before Mullen... 2006-8: 40th, 34th, 53rd (avg 42.3)
    Mullen... 2009-11: 18th, 30th, 41st (avg 29.7)

    Mullen... 2015-17: 18th, 28th, 24th (avg 23.3)
    Moorhead... 2018-20: 27th, 24th, ?

    So Mullen in his first 3 classes raised our recruiting rankings over croom's last 3 by 12.6 spots.

    Moorhead's 3rd class isn't complete, but he has to finish 19th this season just to tie Mullen's last 3. Doubt that happens
    When it comes to recruiting, Moorhead is several spots above Mullen. There are several players here and committed that we wouldn't have under Dan, including Shrader.

  13. #1973
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    74,793
    vCash
    10439
    Quote Originally Posted by Bothrops View Post
    When it comes to recruiting, Moorhead is several spots above Mullen. There are several players here and committed that we wouldn't have under Dan, including Shrader.
    Well there's no data to support that.

  14. #1974
    Senior Member KOdawg1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    11,738
    vCash
    966500
    Quote Originally Posted by Cooterpoot View Post
    He’s not recruiting better from a talent standpoint. Current class (if it sticks) will finish around 25-30.
    We don't get Charles Cross with Mullen

  15. #1975
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    785
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by Bothrops View Post
    When it comes to recruiting, Moorhead is several spots above Mullen. There are several players here and committed that we wouldn't have under Dan, including Shrader.
    1. I'd wait till signing day to be touting his recruiting skills. I think we'll lose a couple of highly rated guys.

    2. Were currently 20th with 6-7 more commits than a lot of other schools. We've hit our ceiling on that ranking while others can move past us.

    3. Dan had several classes in the mid 20s (where this one will end up IMO). And he had a class ranked 18th.

    4. Our highest rated guys in this class are skill guys which tend to be more hit or miss than interior guys.

    All that to say I think the notions of JoMo being some elite recruiter are being grossly exaggerated and it's become the narrative with everyone that mentions keeping him.

  16. #1976
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    785
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by KOdawg1 View Post
    We don't get Charles Cross with Mullen
    We don't get Dak Prescott with JoMo

  17. #1977
    Senior Member KOdawg1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    11,738
    vCash
    966500
    Quote Originally Posted by msugolf View Post
    We don't get Dak Prescott with JoMo
    You're right. I'm not trying to turn this into a JoMo vs. Mullen debate. Mullen is a far superior coach and probably better at finding ''diamonds in the rough'' type players. I'm just saying Joe gives more effort in recruiting, and therefore, will land a high end player or two that Mullen would not have. That's not saying that I want to keep Joe bc I'm getting sick of him too. At the end of the day though, we'll be around the same in the recruiting rankings bc we're Mississippi State. We're never going to recruit at a high level.

  18. #1978
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    4,113
    vCash
    3200
    You also have to look at circumstances as well.

    Mullen got to recruit against OM while they were being investigated. A large part of how well both OM and MSU recruit is tied to in-state class quality and rankings. Then last year we only signed 2 of the top 10 in state for a variety of weird reasons and still did ok. This year we may only get 2-3 as well but 24/7 rankings still seem a big jacked up compared to how many programs actually want some of these guys.

    The big things with recruiting to me is can you go out of state and grab some guys. We did with GS, but this year we're hardly doing any of that which is a tad concerning.

  19. #1979
    Senior Member Really Clark?'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    13,040
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Irondawg View Post
    You also have to look at circumstances as well.

    Mullen got to recruit against OM while they were being investigated. A large part of how well both OM and MSU recruit is tied to in-state class quality and rankings. Then last year we only signed 2 of the top 10 in state for a variety of weird reasons and still did ok. This year we may only get 2-3 as well but 24/7 rankings still seem a big jacked up compared to how many programs actually want some of these guys.

    The big things with recruiting to me is can you go out of state and grab some guys. We did with GS, but this year we're hardly doing any of that which is a tad concerning.
    Mullen also had to recruit against them while they were doing all the illegal things they did to get investigated. Which many held against Mullen at the time for getting out recruited. That definitely went both ways during Mullen?s time here

  20. #1980
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    4,113
    vCash
    3200
    True - at the end of the day the state produces enough rates talent that we should always be in the 30's. It's how you can sell your program outside the state that tells me if you can really recruit or not. That and keeping the absolute top talent in state if you have more influence than OM in that area. I mean a kid like Dean was a great fit at MSU (4H kid, etc) and it was a position of huge need and we couldn't even get an official visit.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.