-
Sugar Bowl
Am I the only person that is loving seeing Bama get whipped?
-
No- I hope Oklahoma scores 60...Bama winning does nothing but hurt State and the rest of us lower SEC schools.
Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is
-
Originally Posted by
Coach34
No- I hope Oklahoma scores 60...Bama winning does nothing but hurt State and the rest of us lower SEC schools.
I'm so glad somebody else besides me gets this. I rarely cheer for other SEC West teams.
-
This shit sucks. And we are not 'competing' with Bama whether they win the Sugar Bowl or not.
-
Originally Posted by
Coach34
No- I hope Oklahoma scores 60...Bama winning does nothing but hurt State and the rest of us lower SEC schools.
I'm with you. I ****ing hate all other SEC teams. Which is why I left SPS
-
Yes. Shoot the Goose that lays the golden eggs. Brilliant**
-
I am so glad that some others have this mentality. I dont get cheering for our rivals. I am a Steelers fan and I sure as hell wasnt going for the Ravens in the playoffs last year. It makes no sense to me.
-
Pro doesn't have Conferences set up like College.
Why do u think the SEC gets these huge TV contracts? Because there are many good SEC teams.
-
So since we receive money as a conference I have to cheer for the teams we play? Negative
-
Well, if "we're not competing" against Bama whether they win the Sugar Bowl or not, then we will get our money whether they win the Sugar Bowl or not. Boomer Sooner
-
-
Some of you are complete morons. The only outcome that helps us in this game is Bama winning. They are one of the few teams keeping the perception of the SEC as the best conference. They are one of the reasons a 1 loss SEC team has had a chance to make the BCS championship game. Conference supremacy is the only reason the SEC has been given the benefit of the doubt, by top teams continuing to win. SEC perception will be the single reason for getting 2 SEC teams in the new playoff system. If you don't think this helps us, you are a huge idiot.
Do you honestly think Bama losing, helps our national perception if we beat them next year? If OK wins and we beat Bama in Tuscaloosa next year, the consensus will be that Bama isn't what they were when they were winning NCs. We are rarely ever going to beat Bama for a recruit, but beating a "perceived" better Bama team on the field will always help our perception. Hell, even losing to them this year, but being the most competitive game they played, garnered us a lot of respect in the media. Some of you go full retard on here sometimes. Bama losing does nothing good for us. It only fuels the national fire, that the SEC is overrated.
-
^^^^^^he gets it^^^^^^
So does he --look down
Last edited by Drugdog; 01-02-2014 at 11:47 PM.
-
You can thank Bama for our shiny new stadium next year. I hate the **** out of Bama till they play OOC and Bowl games but lets not be retarded. MSU isn't about to get $100 MILLION per year without Bama getting us that check. Yea we've contributed to it. About 2% worth.
-
The SEC doesn't have a reputation problem. It's one game versus seven straight national championships.
I like watching the bama fans looks on their faces as they watch it slip away. Schadenfreude meter ticking to the right.
State controls it's own fate on the field. This one game couldn't help or hurt us.
-
You're wrong. The longer you stay on top the easier it gets for all the rest to pull you down. Call it the Tiger Woods effect. It only takes one loss in the NC game for the SEC to no longer be for sure the top dog. Bama losing here hurts the SEC bad.
-
That money does us no good if we cant ever win the SEC. The money is already coming in- let Bama get bitchslapped. Somebody else in the SEC will take their place.
Bama winning keeps all the best recruits wanting to go there. Which in turn makes us lose. I want 6-6 Bama back with Mike Shula as its coach
Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is
-
Originally Posted by
RougeDawg
Some of you are complete morons. The only outcome that helps us in this game is Bama winning. They are one of the few teams keeping the perception of the SEC as the best conference. They are one of the reasons a 1 loss SEC team has had a chance to make the BCS championship game. Conference supremacy is the only reason the SEC has been given the benefit of the doubt, by top teams continuing to win. SEC perception will be the single reason for getting 2 SEC teams in the new playoff system. If you don't think this helps us, you are a huge idiot.
Do you honestly think Bama losing, helps our national perception if we beat them next year? If OK wins and we beat Bama in Tuscaloosa next year, the consensus will be that Bama isn't what they were when they were winning NCs. We are rarely ever going to beat Bama for a recruit, but beating a "perceived" better Bama team on the field will always help our perception. Hell, even losing to them this year, but being the most competitive game they played, garnered us a lot of respect in the media. Some of you go full retard on here sometimes. Bama losing does nothing good for us. It only fuels the national fire, that the SEC is overrated.
Don't disagree totally but Florida, Tenn, and Georgia being so hot and cold is hurting the conference more. The two Titans are LSU and Bama. Period. Auburn is an anomaly. Whenever we make another run the media template will be 'Down Year for the SEC", won't matter a lick how we win.
Bama losing won't hurt us beyond a couple of news cycles.
McCarron can make or lose a few million here in the next 7 minutes.
-
Bama winning this game doesn't help us at even if we beat them next year. It's next year. We could beat them next year and they could still end up in the NC so projecting that is a huge stretch. However, there is no possible plus (in us getting better) with them winning. However, there us a chance with them losing...maybe a player or two, who knows. Plus its fun to watch their bandwagon fans lose it.
Also, if they lose this game and we still beat them next year, no one is going to say "yeah but they lost to OU last year". You don't dominate an entire league for 7 years and one loss erase all that. Hell, it didn't when Auburn won with Cam. Besides, this isn't the NC game anyway
Last edited by chainedup_Dawg; 01-03-2014 at 12:17 AM.
-
Clearly the ref's do not understand Bama does NOT get pass interference calls in the 4th quarter of big games....ever!
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.
Reply With Quote
