-
Looks like Nick will be back next year
-
Nick
Carter
Woodard
Perry
Ado
Prince
Stewart
King
Molinar
Butts
Datcher?
Feazell?
I think this has the potential to be an even better team.
-
Senior Member

Originally Posted by
msstate7
Nick
Carter
Woodard
Perry
Ado
Prince
Stewart
King
Molinar
Butts
Datcher?
Feazell?
I think this has the potential to be an even better team.
I agree. Talent has improved, next man up.
-
Need another shooter. I'm not expecting much from the freshmen.
-
Would be nice to know his eligibility status
-

Originally Posted by
msstate7
Nick
Carter
Woodard
Perry
Ado
Prince
Stewart
King
Molinar
Butts
Datcher?
Feazell?
I think this has the potential to be an even better team.
We lost a guy that led the league in scoring and better? Um no.
-

Originally Posted by
Homedawg
We lost a guy that led the league in scoring and better? Um no.
Q was great. Q did have an upside down assist to TO ratio though, and he wasn't that good of a defender. I think we will be an immediately better defensive team without Q and Holman. Not trying to dog Q though bc I love the guy.
Perry is gonna be a stud. Woodard will be a very solid role player for us. Carter will score. Need nick to step up ball handling some. Another year of development for ado should be big... I expect him to be a solid defender.
Maybe I'm just looking through maroon glasses too much... guess we'll see
-
We aren’t replacing Q period.
And I told everyone how big a loss Nick was.. explosive on offense , energy, and defensive stopper
Peters moving on is best for business. He wasn’t even in top half of PG in the SEC
We Still need an impact transfer
But if Perry and RWII make jumps like they should, Ado improves on Off , this team could very well be better
We will be deeper and more athletic that’s for sure.
Last edited by Ari Gold; 03-26-2019 at 09:02 PM.
-
How old is Jamont Gordon? Would be nice if he came back for his last year of eligibility..**
-

Originally Posted by
msstate7
Q was great. Q did have an upside down assist to TO ratio though, and he wasn't that good of a defender. I think we will be an immediately better defensive team without Q and Holman. Not trying to dog Q though bc I love the guy.
Perry is gonna be a stud. Woodard will be a very solid role player for us. Carter will score. Need nick to step up ball handling some. Another year of development for ado should be big... I expect him to be a solid defender.
Maybe I'm just looking through maroon glasses too much... guess we'll see
No depth is the problem. And Q had a way of making buckets. That's the name of the game. Now Perry is going to be a stud. And Woodard has more upside. So I'll go w that. Ado is ado. Don't see him skyrocketing. Love to be wrong.
-

Originally Posted by
HoopsDawg
Need another shooter. I'm not expecting much from the freshmen.
Butts is a guy who could come in and be that shooter. King is another good shooter. This is a highly underrated recruiting class. I think Stewart will be a pleasant surprise from the perimeter as well.
-
K. I’m proud Nick is back but I pray he doesn’t feel he is entitled because to be honest whatever happened he screwed this team this year and as a player I hope he earns their respect back. If he does and goes about it right we have an instant leader but if he comes back entitled next year will be bad. You leave teammates hanging like he did this year , he better step up and over earn his position as a leader of this team
-

Originally Posted by
Wade Garrett
Yep, and some on here jumped the gun with their so-called sources who said he wouldn't be back.
-

Originally Posted by
Dawgcap
K. I’m proud Nick is back but I pray he doesn’t feel he is entitled because to be honest whatever happened he screwed this team this year and as a player I hope he earns their respect back. If he does and goes about it right we have an instant leader but if he comes back entitled next year will be bad. You leave teammates hanging like he did this year , he better step up and over earn his position as a leader of this team
I don't see that happening with Nick.
-

Originally Posted by
Wade Garrett
Good!
-

Originally Posted by
Dawgcap
K. I’m proud Nick is back but I pray he doesn’t feel he is entitled because to be honest whatever happened he screwed this team this year and as a player I hope he earns their respect back. If he does and goes about it right we have an instant leader but if he comes back entitled next year will be bad. You leave teammates hanging like he did this year , he better step up and over earn his position as a leader of this team
Feel he is entitled ??
He missed basically 1/4 of the season this year including the SEC and NCAA tournament...
I think entitlement is the last thing Nick will feel..
-

Originally Posted by
Ari Gold
We aren’t replacing Q period.
And I told everyone how big a loss Nick was.. explosive on offense , energy, and defensive stopper
Peters moving on is best for business. He wasn’t even in top half of PG in the SEC
We Still need an impact transfer
But if Perry and RWII make jumps like they should, Ado improves on Off , this team could very well be better
We will be deeper and more athletic that’s for sure.
I hear you but I just don't see how Ado will improve that much on offense. He has the worst pair of hands I have ever seen.
-
The issue next year and what we will miss not having Q is a lack of a guy who can manufacture his own shots and that you want the ball in his hands late in the game.
-

Originally Posted by
msu15
I hear you but I just don't see how Ado will improve that much on offense. He has the worst pair of hands I have ever seen.
He doesn’t have to be great.
He will get better .
-

Originally Posted by
Homedawg
We lost a guy that led the league in scoring and better? Um no.
We are going to miss Q obviously, but our team is going to make a lot more sense. Our top five players all clearly fit into a traditional starting lineup. I think we'll end up better on defense b/c of effort. I think you'll see Nick play better next year being the guy at PG (not that he played poorly this year). You'll hopefully see solid jumps from Perry and Woodard, so I think our top three players will be pretty good. We're going to need somebody to emerge (or transfer in) to fill out our rotation, and I don't know if we have the pieces (or prospects) for that to happen, but I think our starting five next year could end up better than our starting five this year even if they are not actually as talented looking at individual pieces.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.